Resources

Resources Used:

Assouline, S., Fosenberg, S. & Nigpon M.F. The Paradox of Twice Exceptionality. Belin-Blank Center.2, 1-52.

Burney, V.H. & Neumeister, K.H. Guiding Studentswith High Ability: Social and EmotionalConsiderations. 1-17.

Christopher, M. & Shewmaker, J. (2010).How does perfectionism related to gifted and high-ability learners? Perfectionism and Affective

Variables,33, 21-24.

Cross, T.L. (2009). Social and EmotionalDevelopment of Gifted Children: Straight Talk.Social Emotional Needs, 32(2), 40-65

Ferrance, E. (2000). Themes in education: Action research. Brown University: Educational Alliance, 1-34.

Greene, M.J. & Reis, S.M.Using Self-RegulatedLearning to ReverseUnderachievement inTalented Students. NEAGSchool of Education.

Johnson, M., & Button, K. (2000). Connecting graduate education in language arts with teaching contexts: The power of action research.

English Education, 32, 107-126.

Manning, S. (2006).Recognizing Gifted Students:A Practical Guide forTeachers. Kappa Delta PiRecord, 64-68.

Reis, S. (2011). Talking Circles: Social/Emotional Impacts on G/T From Culturally Diverse Backgrounds. The SENG Newsletter, 2(3), 1-5.

Ross, J., Rolheiser, C., & Hogoboam-Gray, A. (1999). Effects of collaborative action research on the knowledge of five Canadian teacher

researchers. The Elementary School Journal, 99 (3), 255-274.

Sagor, R. (2004). The action research guidebook: A four-step process for educators and school teams. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Sax, C., & Fisher, D. (2001) Using qualitative action research to effect change: Implications for professional education. Teacher Education

Quarterly, 28 (2), 71-80.

Sword, L. (2011).Emotional Intensity inGifted Children. SENG

.