(I'm using Canvas in laptop) I don't know how to report a bug but I think I found a bug in file submission. I accidentally click the submit assignment button without attaching the file first, so canvas notified me that it can't pass an empty submission. However, as I tried to click "Upload File", the button does not work, it just become unresponsive no matter how many tries I do it. So I went back to dashboard, and click the course again and choose my assignment, this time I clicked the button "Upload File" and now the button works.
To verify if the bug is really consistent I tried it again in different assignment, I click the submit assignment without attaching anything, after the notification I tried to click the button "upload file" and it doesn't work again.
Mps 02 Solved Assignment Free Download Pdf
DOWNLOAD 🔥 https://urllio.com/2yGasi 🔥
Sorry to read that you are both experiencing issues with the button to submit assignments to your instructors. If you are finding a potential bug in how Canvas is working, I would highly suggest that you report that to Canvas. You'll want to be on the screen where you are experiencing the issue. Then, click on your "Help" icon on the far left-hand side global navigation menu of Canvas. You should see a link to "Report a Problem". When you submit this form, some additional metadata will be sent along with your ticket to let the Canvas technician know some additional details about your course. You'll receive a reply from the Help Desk staff, and hopefully they will be able to get this resolved for you soon!
I repeatedly encounter the following problem: When I use 'solve' to solve an equation or a system of equations, it works fine as long as I don't try to assign the result (see minimal example below and in the attachment), which is quite essential. It just starts to complain with 'This variable is undefined' but does not even mark any single variable.
Mathcads symbolic engine unfortunately does not know anything about units and so A and V are treated as unknown variables (which may be negative or even not real). So given those unknowns, the expression seems to hard for muPad to solve and it shows some auxiliary variables in the result. I don't know what exactly is happening here but it seems to be caused by the conflict between forced to float mode (because of the float numbers provided) and the aim to solve as exact as possible using the ln. As Alan shows muPad sure is capable to solve the equation with variables only (no numeric values provided) and you showed in your second post that muPad is able to solve the equation if only numeric values are provided (even the Euler number).
At first glance I didn't notice those silly auxiliary variables which were thrown out by the symbolics (so I edited my first answer slightly to draw attention to it). Its really very strange that the mixture of float variables and "exact" Euler number messes up the symbolic calculation so much.
Its interesting that the symbolic is able to solve with all variables and also with all numeric values (even Euler number). But it does not work OK with numeric values for most variables but the "exact" Euler number.
As soon as we delete the assignment V.2 := V.2 the symbolic solve comes up with its auxiliary variables X... and E... which the numerics don't known and therefore throws the error. Its somewhat strange.
I have a student or two every semester that goes AWOL in at least one section, usually more. These students drag down the averages of the assignments and give the appearance that the class is doing significantly worse than they are. How can I omit their deserters from being factored into the statistics?
As far as students, you may be able to deactivate students in your course, but it depends on your institution's settings. In the People tab, you can click on the three-dot menu on the far right. Then choose Deactivate user and that will conclude their participation and remove them from the gradebook.
I found this thread doing a community cleanup, so apologies for the late post. I did want to clarify that if you leave a score blank, it shouldn't factor into statistics for the assignment. If you mark is as missing and enter a 0 (or something along those lines), it will factor in though. I can see both sides of the argument to leave "missing" scores out f an assignment or include them though. Maybe adding in a course option for this would be a good compromise. You can submit an idea suggestion around this if you'd like!
Sorry, I was not aware that your replied. The issue with that solution is that sometimes it's not a matter of an AWOL student. Sometimes, a student simply didn't do the assignment. In these cases, I do not believe they should be counted in the assignment averages because it's not representative of graded responses. At the very least there should be an option to keep students with a "missing" tag out of the class numbers. This is massive flaw, in my opinion.
The use-case is as follows: Identify the Assignment Rule(sysrule_assignment) which run on a task type record. Then, put a worknote on that incident or wm_task or etc., with the Assignment Rule's (AR for the rest of this post) name or sys_id. I'd like to accomplish this on server-side.
For the above, I'd like to track/intercept/trace/listen the update transaction during which the AR is run and the update happens on the Task type record's Assignment Group field. Otherwise, just "simply" get the sys_id of the AR.
I had also tried to use in a BR and in the AR's Script field the following lines, but it returned the task type record.(e.g. incident; I guess in the chain of requests/events the task record was the new initiator at that point):
In case I didn't, then obviously I don't know enough about the inner workings and architecture of ServiceNow (but I'm more than open to learn it), hence why I'm looking for some help, different point of views or approaches to this.
Tracking the Assignment Rule (AR) that ran on a task type record in ServiceNow can be a bit complex because Assignment Rules typically run on the client-side, making it challenging to intercept the exact moment when an Assignment Rule is executed. However, you can still achieve this with some workarounds.
Custom Script: Create a custom script (Business Rule or Script Include) that runs before or after the Assignment Rule. This script should log information about the Assignment Rule execution.
Audit Table: Create a custom table to store Assignment Rule execution logs. This table can include fields such as the Incident (or task) number, Assignment Rule name/sys_id, timestamp, or any other relevant information.
Additionally, please note that this approach doesn't directly integrate with the Event Queue or provide real-time tracking. Instead, it captures Assignment Rule executions when the related record (e.g., Incident) is updated.
If you don't mind, can we take a quick step back as to why you need to do this in the first place? Is this because you all have a bunch of assignment rules that could be overlapping and in an effort to sort of clean things up, you're wanting to track which is running?
Outside of that, the assignment rules have access to "current" which would be the record object and that means they run on the server...not client. You could, in theory, add a few variables in the script of the assignment rule with the name of the assignment rule, etc. and then set the work-note as part of your tests to see which one is executing it, etc. Just a thought.
The problem is that current points not to the AR itself, but to the target table record, that one sets up in the Table field. So, current.sys_id will give me the Incident sys_id for example, not the ARs. 152ee80cbc
reduce pdf file size below 100 kb software download