The alternative media are a vital
undeveloped organism of well-known force, and past conceivable specialized inadequacies and persistent neediness of assets - may be irremediable, given their very state of non-incorporated, of "minimal" in the fair of the word-they are perhaps the best weapons of grassroots popular government, of the progressive majority rules system.
Subjects
1. New types of communication on the Internet and political fights.
Today the new digital data and communication technologies appear to have come to remain. There is no returning. They as of now comprise a social, socializing certainty in the broadest sense. As indicated by the thing we are starting to see, an impressive number of individuals all throughout the planet, principally youthful, in rich nations of the North or helpless nations of the South, and among the different financial layers, at this point don't consider existence without these technologies. Without a doubt, they are changing the method of relating, of tackling ordinary things, of speculation, of living!
A few years prior, in 2002, Delia Crovi said alluding to this continuous interaction: "In 2001, the World Observatory of Communication Systems delivered in Paris the consequences of an investigation on innovative gear in the SIC [society of the data and communication].
This examination insists that in 2006 one out of five individuals will have a versatile or wireless, double the number accessible since we have one gadget for each ten occupants. A similar report shows that in 2003 there will be more than one billion mobile phones on the planet, and in the following five years there will be 423,000,000 new clients. Without a doubt, these information could take care of the possibility that we are working at fast advances and on a planetary scale, a data society, a thought that is advanced most importantly by equipment and programming makers, just as by numerous individuals of the world's legislatures.
(7) It has been said that single direction to "enter the way of progress" is to join this blast of digital technologies. In any case, actually, there is an error: in numerous Latin American nations, for instance, the quantity of cell phones far surpasses the landlines, and surprisingly the quantity of occupants (more than one telephone for each individual) without this improving the primary states of life.
As of now it appears to be that nobody can get away from the tide of new digital technologies, which are progressively covering everything. It very well may be asserted, unafraid of being off-base in the evaluation, that "to be in innovation, ahead of time, in the incorporated world (globalized and fruitful?), You must be associated." If these boundaries are not followed, the improvement train is lost. Or then again, in any event, that is the thing that the stubborn prevailing lecturing says.
There is no uncertainty that communication is a characterizing edge of the human. In spite of the fact that the facts demonstrate that in the collective of animals there is the marvel of communication, as to the explicitly human field there are attributes that are exceptional to such an extent that they can lead us to say, without more, that if something characterizes our species it is the capacity to communicate. , which is nevertheless another method of saying: to cooperate with others. The human subject becomes what it is just through connection with others. Communication, around there, is the essential skyline wherein the circuit of socialization unfurls. (no censorship news)
We communicate in an unexpected way; that isn't new. Since forever there are the most assorted ways of doing it, from orality or cavern canvases to the most complex current communication technologies on account of man-made consciousness and space route. However, it is without a doubt a noteworthy actuality that with the wonders that happened in innovation, with the development of modern creation bound for huge business sectors and with the sped up urbanization of these most recent two centuries that is occurring everywhere on the substance of the planet,
changes have happened. specific in the manner we communicate. In this point of view, mass communication emerged, that is: the cycle where what is unmistakable is the huge number of beneficiaries who get messages from a solitary sender. The 20th century has been checked essentially by that reality, novel ever, and with its own attributes that characterize the modalities of advancement as far as progress. The monstrous enters the scene victoriously to at this point don't pull out.
Somewhat recently of the 20th century, effectively in full logical specialized blast with an industry that has unquestionably changed the world, spreading to basically every edge of the planet, communication technologies are establishing the rhythm of worldwide society. It is from that second that one can successfully talk about a genuine "worldwide town", a totally interconnected, intercommunicated world, a reality where actual distances presently don't comprise a deterrent for everybody to draw nearer to everybody.
In this point of view, the new society that is arising with globalization, and subsequently its devices second to none, the supposed ICTs - the phone, the PC, the web , open up these inquiries: accomplishes more accessible data essentially produce a superior personal satisfaction and better close to home and social turn of events? Do these technologies help social consideration, or do they build up rejection? Or on the other hand do they just create benefits for the multinationals that are committed to their commercialization, adding to a more prominent and more refined social control by the extraordinary worldwide forces?
The appropriate response isn't in the actual technologies, obviously. Technologies, as they have always been since forever, are not without a simply instrumental worth. The significant thing is the human venture wherein they are enrolled, the goal at the assistance of which they act. Around there, to break an oversimplified and Manichean methodology: there are no "acceptable" strategies and "awful" procedures in moral terms.
"Past the associations, it is the substantial and compelling uses that could possibly prompt keeping up or extending the holes that really exist in reality. With which the boundless transparency that the simple proper admittance to the organization assumes isn't really enough to discuss democratization of society or even of admittance to data. Significantly less in the event that it is applicable data for the dynamic interaction or for investment in the socially delivered pay. With the web, certain gets to are opened, yet society and culture are not democratized ". (8)
Obviously, admittance to technologies that permit data the executives in a manner more than ever in history offers the chance of a subjective jump for advancement, for the genuine improvement of everyday environments. It occurs, in any case, that these technologies, past a specific dream of outright democratization, don't without help from anyone else produce the progressions important to end the persistent issues of imbalances that keep on populating the world. (swarovski naušnice)
Past the endeavors at "genuine private enterprise", of "capable free enterprise", class struggles and the allotment of abundance created by human work stay the core of the matter. Technologies, in spite of the fact that they can improve day to day environments by making them more agreeable and agreeable, they don't alter the political-social relations from which its utilization is chosen. Private enterprise, regardless of how "genuine and mindful" it very well might be, doesn't end with the misuse and rejection of the dominant part, regardless of whether it is "associated.
Today these new technologies are progressively pervasive in all aspects of life: they are utilized for the commercialization of labor and products, for internet banking, for policy implementation (installment of duties, the executives of documentation, recording of grumblings ), for the quest for the most changed data (scholastic, editorial, for diversion), for relaxation and entertainment (videogames being one of the quickest developing cases in the realm of new digital technologies),
for the act of sports, for the improvement of craftsmanship, in open administration (a few governments are fusing the utilization of interpersonal organizations, for example, Twitter, Facebook or YouTube when the specialists spread the word about their situation on important occasions), and there is even an entire field identified with computerized sex.
As should be obvious, these new spaces opened by current forefront technologies accommodate everything. As it couldn't be else, they likewise comprise a political war zone. As a space where the incredible financial forces - hence political and social - have set up their genuine, the famous field, or on the off chance that we need to say it another way: the subordinate classes, the misused of various types, who are as yet the planetary greater part, we have there one more spot from which to battle. For the case: political-social conflict.
The alternative media that make use of these techniques have their natural scope of work in cyberspace. But from now on we must hurry to make it very clear that no change is possible ONLY with the use of cybernetic networks. The illusion - undoubtedly manipulated - in relation to the fact that today a "virtual revolution" is possible does not go beyond that: illusion. Popular mobilization, like sex, continues to need a corporeal presence.
We do not deny at all - we say it as producers of an electronic page precisely: ARGENPRESS - that in this communicational reality there must also be a battle. But do not be confused: virtual reality does not replace the other reality. The class struggle, exploitation and the extraction of surplus value - concepts that are not very "in fashion" today,
given the neoliberal tide that has invaded all spaces and has silenced us a lot - they continue to be the Gordian knot of society, of the march of history. If violence continues to be “the midwife of history”, the war in cyberspace is one more front of struggle, but it does not replace the people of flesh and blood.https://criticalthinker.cyou/