If you want a lighter, playful gym pair with a distinctive slide-access case, choose MIPOW Miffy; if you need longer stated total playback and case-based touch controls, choose QJF Earbuds. For gym use, QJF is my practical pick for its 60-hour combined-playtime claim and adjustable controls; Miffy is the more characterful choice if its Miffy case design is part of the appeal.
MIPOW Miffy vs QJF Earbuds at a Glance
• MIPOW Miffy’s biggest strength: a playful semi-exposed case with a Miffy doll and color LED lighting, plus earbuds listed at 4 g each. Trade-off: the case total is stated as 30 hours, half QJF’s claimed total.
• QJF Earbuds’ biggest strength: up to 60 hours of total playback with the case and a case touchscreen for music, volume, noise cancellation, and EQ controls. Trade-off: the product information does not specify the individual earbud weight or give the case a character-led design.
• Both models list IPX5 water resistance and up to 6 hours of playback from a single charge.
• MIPOW suits buyers who value a distinctive Miffy design and a lightweight stated earbud weight; QJF suits buyers who prioritize longer stated combined playback and screen-based controls.
MIPOW Miffy is the more playful option. Its semi-exposed charging case lets you slide the earbuds in and out without opening a conventional lid. A Miffy doll sits in the case, with color LED lighting adding a decorative touch. If earbuds are also a small personal accessory, that design gives MIPOW a clear identity beyond plain in-ear hardware.
The earbuds are listed at 4 g each, and the product description says their shape follows the inner contour of the ear. That may appeal to someone who wants a light-feeling pair for workouts or longer listening, though fit is personal and the sheet does not provide sizing details. IPX5 water resistance is listed for sweat and splashes, making the Miffy pair a reasonable candidate for gym sessions or outdoor activity where those exposures are relevant.
The practical basics are solid on paper: Bluetooth 5.3, touch controls for playback and calls, voice-assistant activation, and up to 6 hours per charge. The stated total with the case is 30 hours. I would consider MIPOW if the Miffy styling and 4 g listed weight matter more to me than maximizing case-supported playback. I would skip it if my main priority were the longer stated total or having a touchscreen on the case; those are QJF’s clearer advantages.
QJF puts more emphasis on control and endurance. Its charging case has a touchscreen that is described as handling volume, track changes, noise-cancellation control, EQ modes, and finding the earbuds without reaching for a phone. That is a notable difference from MIPOW’s touch controls on the earbuds themselves. If you often adjust audio during a commute, workout, or workday, the case screen is the feature that most clearly separates QJF.
The listed battery figures are up to 6 hours from one charge and up to 60 hours total with the case. Bluetooth 5.4 is specified, compared with MIPOW’s Bluetooth 5.3. QJF also lists ANC, or active noise cancellation, and clear-call noise reduction. The sheet does not quantify the noise reduction, so I would treat ANC as a feature to consider rather than assume it will block every gym sound or conversation.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-23 · 11 min read · Independent comparison
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for longer stated total playback → QJF Earbuds. QJF lists up to 60 hours with the case; MIPOW lists up to 30 hours.
• Best for single-charge playback on the stated figures → Tie. Both list up to 6 hours from one charge.
• Best for gym sweat and splash resistance → Tie on the listed rating. Both specify IPX5, though neither sheet gives a more detailed water-resistance use guide.
• Best for case-based controls → QJF Earbuds. Its touchscreen is described as controlling volume, tracks, ANC, and EQ modes.
• Best for characterful case design → MIPOW Miffy. The semi-exposed case includes a Miffy doll and color LED lighting.
• Best for the newer listed Bluetooth version → QJF Earbuds. It specifies Bluetooth 5.4, while MIPOW specifies 5.3.
• Best multipoint true wireless earbuds for gym → Neither is documented as multipoint. Bluetooth 5.3 or 5.4 alone does not establish simultaneous connections to multiple devices, so check for explicit multipoint support if that is essential.
I would buy QJF Earbuds for the gym because its listed 60-hour total with the case and case touchscreen make it the more practical pick for frequent listening and on-the-go adjustments. Both models list IPX5 resistance and up to 6 hours per charge, so the deciding edge for me is QJF’s longer stated case-supported playback. I would choose MIPOW instead if the Miffy design and 4 g listed earbud weight mattered more to me than those conveniences.
Both list IPX5 water resistance and up to 6 hours of playback per charge. QJF lists a longer total with its case, while MIPOW specifies 4 g per earbud and has a distinctive Miffy-themed case.
QJF lists up to 60 hours total with its charging case; MIPOW lists up to 30 hours total. Both list up to 6 hours from a single charge, so the difference is in the stated combined total.
Neither product sheet specifies multipoint pairing or spatial audio. If either feature is essential, look for explicit confirmation rather than inferring it from the Bluetooth version or general audio descriptions.
QJF explicitly lists active noise cancellation and case touchscreen controls for adjusting it. MIPOW lists adaptive noise cancellation and noise reduction for calls, but its details do not describe a comparable case-screen control system.
4o
If you want a lighter, playful gym pair with a distinctive slide-access case, choose MIPOW Miffy; if you need longer stated total playback and case-based touch controls, choose QJF Earbuds. For gym use, I’d lean toward QJF for its 60-hour combined-playtime claim and adjustable controls; Miffy is the more characterful option if its case design is part of the appeal.
Neither product’s listed features establish multipoint pairing or spatial audio, so shoppers searching for the best multipoint gaming headset for gym or best spatial audio head phones for gym shouldn’t assume either feature is included. These two are easier to compare on their documented basics: water resistance, fit, controls, Bluetooth version, and stated battery life.
• MIPOW Miffy’s biggest strength: a playful semi-exposed case with a Miffy doll and color LED lighting, plus earbuds listed at 4 g each. Trade-off: its stated total playback with the case is 30 hours, half QJF’s claim.
• QJF Earbuds’ biggest strength: up to 60 hours of total playback with the case and a touchscreen for music, volume, noise cancellation, and EQ controls. Trade-off: the product information doesn’t specify the individual earbud weight or offer Miffy’s character-led case design.
• Both models list IPX5 water resistance and up to 6 hours of playback from a single charge.
• MIPOW suits buyers who value a distinctive Miffy design and a stated earbud weight; QJF suits buyers who prioritize longer claimed playback with the case and screen-based controls.
MIPOW Miffy is the more playful option. Its semi-exposed charging case lets you slide the earbuds in and out instead of opening a conventional lid. A Miffy doll sits in the case, with color LED lighting adding a decorative touch. If you like your everyday accessories to have some personality, that design gives MIPOW a clear identity.
The earbuds are listed at 4 g each, and the product description says their shape follows the inner contour of the ear. That may appeal to someone who wants a light-feeling pair for workouts or longer listening, though fit is personal and the product details don’t give sizing information. MIPOW lists IPX5 water resistance for sweat and splashes, making it a reasonable candidate for gym sessions or outdoor activity involving those conditions.
The practical basics include Bluetooth 5.3, touch controls for playback and calls, voice-assistant activation, and up to 6 hours per charge. The stated total with the case is 30 hours. I’d consider MIPOW if the Miffy styling and listed earbud weight matter more to me than maximizing case-supported playback. I’d pass if my main priority were the longer stated total or having a touchscreen on the case; those are QJF’s clearer advantages.
QJF puts more emphasis on control and endurance. Its charging case has a touchscreen described as handling volume, track changes, noise-cancellation control, EQ modes, and finding the earbuds without reaching for a phone. That’s a meaningful difference from MIPOW’s touch controls on the earbuds themselves. If you often adjust audio during a commute, workout, or workday, the case screen is QJF’s standout feature.
QJF lists up to 6 hours from one charge and up to 60 hours total with the case. It specifies Bluetooth 5.4, compared with MIPOW’s Bluetooth 5.3. QJF also lists active noise cancellation and clear-call noise reduction. The product details don’t quantify how much noise is reduced, so I’d treat ANC as a useful listed feature, not a guarantee that every gym sound or conversation will disappear.
QJF also lists IPX5 water resistance and an ergonomic in-ear design for sports and daily wear. That makes it a plausible option for someone who wants one pair for gym sessions and routine listening. I’d choose QJF if the touchscreen and longer stated total are my priorities. I’d look elsewhere if I specifically wanted a Miffy-themed case or a documented earbud weight, since neither is a stated QJF feature.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for longer stated total playback → QJF Earbuds. QJF lists up to 60 hours with the case; MIPOW lists up to 30 hours.
• Best for gym sweat and splash resistance → Tie on the listed rating. Both specify IPX5.
• Best for case-based controls → QJF Earbuds. Its touchscreen is described as controlling volume, tracks, ANC, and EQ modes.
• Best for characterful case design → MIPOW Miffy. The semi-exposed case includes a Miffy doll and color LED lighting.
• Best for a specified lightweight earbud figure → MIPOW Miffy. Its earbuds are listed at 4 g each; QJF’s product details don’t provide an individual earbud weight.
• Best for the newer listed Bluetooth version → QJF Earbuds. It specifies Bluetooth 5.4, while MIPOW specifies Bluetooth 5.3.
• Best for multipoint true wireless earbuds for gym → Neither is documented as multipoint. The listed Bluetooth versions alone don’t confirm simultaneous connections to multiple devices.
I’d buy QJF Earbuds for the gym because its listed 60-hour total with the case and touchscreen controls make it the more practical pick for frequent listening and on-the-go adjustments. Both models list IPX5 resistance and up to 6 hours per charge, so QJF’s longer stated case-supported playback breaks the tie for me. I’d choose MIPOW instead if the Miffy design and 4 g listed earbud weight mattered more.
Both list IPX5 water resistance and up to 6 hours of playback per charge. QJF lists a longer total with its case, while MIPOW specifies 4 g per earbud and has a distinctive Miffy-themed case.
QJF lists up to 60 hours total with its charging case; MIPOW lists up to 30 hours total. Both list up to 6 hours from a single charge, so the difference is in the stated combined total.
Neither product’s listed features specify multipoint pairing or spatial audio. If either feature is essential, look for explicit confirmation rather than inferring it from the Bluetooth version or general audio descriptions.
QJF explicitly lists active noise cancellation and touchscreen controls for adjusting it. MIPOW lists adaptive noise cancellation and noise reduction for calls, but its product details don’t describe a comparable case-screen control system.
• JBL Tune 510BT vs ZOVIMAX Bone Conduction Headphones
• Poounur Earbuds vs Monster Achieve 100
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.