If you want lightweight, in-ear earbuds with detachable earrings for flights, choose Mingzhe Earbuds; if you need an open-ear fit that leaves your ear canal unblocked, choose Domary Earbuds Headphones Open. For most travelers choosing between these two, I’d lean toward Domary for its open-ear design and fit details. Mingzhe is the simpler choice if you specifically want an in-ear style.
• Mingzhe’s strength: 4.5-gram earbuds, detachable earrings, and a stated listening range of 4–8 hours. Trade-off: the listed design is in-ear, so it does not offer Domary’s unblocked-ear approach.
• Domary’s strength: an open-ear fit that does not block the ear canal, with a stated 10-meter transmission range. Trade-off: its open design does not create the seal associated with traditional in-ear buds.
• Mingzhe suits listeners who want a lightweight in-ear pair with a decorative detail and straightforward listening needs.
• Domary suits people who prioritize an open, pressure-free fit, especially if they wear glasses or have small ears.
• Both models list detachable earrings, 4.5 grams per earbud, ABS and silicone construction, and 4–8 hours of playback. Neither sheet provides a noise-cancellation specification.
Mingzhe is an in-ear option built around a combination of lightweight wear and a fashion detail: detachable earrings. Each earbud weighs 4.5 grams, and the listed materials include ABS, silicone, and Ti wire. Those facts point to a compact-feeling design with an accessory element, rather than a conventional-looking pair of earbuds. The earrings can be detached, so the decorative feature is not necessarily part of every wearing setup.
The battery capacity is listed as 200mAh, with 4–8 hours of continuous listening. That range gives a buyer a useful frame for everyday listening, a workout, or part of a travel day, but it is not a guarantee of a full day away from charging. For flights, I’d think about the length of the listening stretches you need and whether you can recharge between them. The sheet also describes clear vocals and balanced acoustics, which makes calls, podcasts, and speech-led audio relevant use cases, though it gives no microphone specifications or measured sound details.
The in-ear placement is the main distinction to consider. Mingzhe may appeal if you prefer an earbud that sits in the ear rather than resting around it, and the detachable earrings give it a more distinctive look than a plain pair. Its product information does not specify an open-ear fit, a transmission range, or noise cancellation, so I would not assume those features. Skip Mingzhe if keeping your ear canal unblocked is the deciding factor.
Domary’s headline difference is its open-ear design: the earbuds rest on the ears without blocking the ear canal or creating a seal. That may suit someone who dislikes the pressure or isolated feeling associated with sealed earbuds. Each bud is listed at 4.5 grams, and the fit is described as intended for small ears and glasses wearers. If those are recurring fit concerns, Domary gives a more specific reason to consider it than Mingzhe does.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-22 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
Its sound description emphasizes an airy, natural presentation, with drivers tuned for clear vocals and smooth, balanced sound. That framing makes podcasts and calls especially plausible uses, alongside music. The open design also has a trade-off: because it does not seal the ear canal, it is not the choice here for someone seeking a sealed in-ear fit. Neither product sheet specifies active noise cancellation, so I would not buy either on the assumption that it will block cabin noise on a flight.
• Best for an open-ear fit → Domary Earbuds Headphones Open. Its design rests on the ears without blocking the ear canal.
• Best for an explicitly in-ear design → Mingzhe Earbuds. The product information identifies its ear placement as in-ear.
• Best for glasses wearers or small ears → Domary. Its fit description specifically addresses both.
• Best for a stated wireless range → Domary. Its sheet lists a 10-meter transmission range; Mingzhe’s does not give a range.
• Best for a fashion-forward in-ear option → Mingzhe. It combines in-ear placement with detachable earrings and a 4.5-gram weight per bud.
• Best when you want an open, less enclosed listening feel → Domary. Its ear-canal-unblocked design is the clearest match.
• Best for a stated playback estimate → Tie. Both list 4–8 hours of continuous playback and a 200mAh battery capacity.
• Best for speech-led listening based on the descriptions → Domary, narrowly. Its sheet calls out podcasts and phone calls, while Mingzhe also describes clear vocals and calls. Neither provides microphone specifications, so I would not call either the clear pick for the “best with microphone wireless earbuds for flights” without more information.
The same caution applies to the phrase “best sports earbuds for flights.” Both product descriptions connect the earbuds with active use, but the sheets do not provide a waterproof rating or other durability test details. For travel, the practical distinction is more about in-ear versus open-ear comfort than a proven advantage in sweat resistance.
First, decide what you want the earbuds to do around your ears. An in-ear design and an open-ear design feel different by definition, and the right fit depends on your preference. If you often find sealed earbuds uncomfortable, Domary’s open construction is the more relevant feature. If you actively want an in-ear pair, Mingzhe is the clearer match.
Next, plan around the shared battery estimate. Both sheets say 4–8 hours of continuous playback, but neither gives enough detail to predict where a particular listening session will fall within that range. On a flight, that makes it sensible to consider your expected listening time rather than assuming either pair will cover every long-haul journey without interruption. Their sheets also do not specify a charging case or charging time, so I would not infer either.
Sound and noise are separate questions. Both product descriptions mention clear vocals and balanced sound, but neither gives measurements that would support a precise sound-quality comparison. Domary’s open design is intended to avoid blocking the ear canal; that is a comfort distinction, not a stated noise-cancellation feature. If reducing cabin sound is your priority, these product sheets do not establish that either model will do it.
If cost is part of your final decision, check the current price on Amazon using the page’s button. The available product information here does not provide pricing, and the feature comparison alone cannot determine which is the better value for your budget.
My Verdict
In my opinion, I’d choose Domary for flights if comfort comes first: its open-ear design, 4.5-gram weight, and stated fit for glasses wearers and small ears give it the more clearly described comfort case. I’d choose Mingzhe instead if I wanted an in-ear fit with detachable earrings. Both list 4–8 hours of playback, so neither gets an edge from the battery estimate alone. For my travel pick, Domary’s open fit is the deciding detail.
Neither product sheet specifies noise cancellation. Domary is open-ear and does not block the ear canal, so I would not treat it as a noise-isolating choice based on the information provided.
Domary is the more directly supported choice: its fit description specifically mentions glasses wearers and small ears. Mingzhe’s sheet gives its weight and in-ear placement but does not make the same fit claim.
Both products list 4–8 hours of continuous listening and a 200mAh battery capacity. The sheets do not explain what determines the actual runtime within that range.
Either could suit shorter listening sessions, based on the stated 4–8-hour playback range, but neither sheet establishes that it will cover every long flight without recharging. Choose based on fit first: Mingzhe is in-ear, while Domary leaves the ear canal unblocked.
• JVC HAFX5A or SHUAIGUO Compact: which is better
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.