In previous pieces, I argued that there's a real and large risk of AI systems' developing dangerous goals of their own and defeating all of humanity - at least in the absence of specific efforts to prevent this from happening. I discussed why it could be hard to build AI systems without this risk and how it might be doable.

My current analogy for the deployment problem is racing through a minefield: each player is hoping to be ahead of others, but anyone moving too quickly can cause a disaster. (In this minefield, a single mine is big enough to endanger all the racers.)

Minefield Video Download

Download Zip 🔥 https://geags.com/2yGB0q 🔥

A key point here is that making AI systems safe enough to commercialize (with some initial success and profits) could be much less (and different) effort than making them robustly safe (no lurking risk of global catastrophe). The basic reasons for this are covered in my previous post on difficulties with AI safety research In brief:

Learning and demonstrating that the danger is high could help convince many actors to move more slowly and cautiously. Learning that the danger is low could lessen some of the tough tradeoffs here and allow cautious actors to move forward more decisively with developing advanced AI systems; I think this could be a good thing in terms of what sorts of actors lead the way on transformative AI.

The lines between these categories of information might end up fuzzy. Some information might be useful for demonstrating the dangers and capabilities of cutting-edge systems, or useful for making systems safer and for building them in the first place. So there could be a lot of hard judgment calls here.

This is another area where I worry that commercial incentives might not be enough on their own. For example, it is usually important for a commercial project to have some reasonable level of security against hackers, but not necessarily for it to be able to resist well-resourced attempts by states to steal its intellectual property.

Ideally, cautious actors would learn of every case where someone is building a dangerous AI system (whether purposefully or unwittingly), and be able to stop the project. If this were done reliably enough, it could take the teeth out of the threat; a partial version could buy time.

Additionally, if safe AI systems are in wide use, it could be harder for dangerous (similarly powerful) AI systems to do harm. This could be via a wide variety of mechanisms. For example:

Even if AI alignment ends up being relatively easy - such that a given AI project can make safe, powerful systems with about 10% more effort than making dangerous, powerful systems - the situation still looks pretty nerve-wracking, because of how many different players could end up trying to build systems of their own without putting in that 10%.

I understand classic free speech examples like you can not yell "Fire" in a movie theater. Since this sign is on private land and will only be visible when you are on the property, I would love to have a legal opinion.

My alternative is to put up a sign "Keep Out: Testing Lasers from Space" which is a derivative of this idea and (IMO) would be considered humor. I know there is a line, how and where is that "line" defined?

(a) Whoever imparts or conveys or causes to be imparted or conveyedfalse information, knowing the information to be false, concerning anattempt or alleged attempt being made or to be made, to do any actwhich would be a crime prohibited by this chapter or chapter 97 orchapter 111 of this title shall be subject to a civil penalty of notmore than $1,000 which shall be recoverable in a civil action broughtin the name of the United States.

However, the false information has to have a specific character. Ch. 97 regards trains and mass transportation systems (entering to commit a crime, terrorist attacks). I assume you don't have railroad lines running through your property. Ch. 111 regards shipping, presumably not relevant to your land. Finally, Ch. 2 ("this chapter") regards aircraft and motor vehicles: 18 USC 33 prohibits endangering... so for the sake of discussion, perhaps there is a false threat against motor vehicles (assuming there is a highway near your property). So...

is a criminal. Therefore conveying false information that an explosive is in proximity to a motor vehicle is also against the law. That's probably close enough to warrant hiring an attorney before you end up arrested on a federal charge.

Para. (a) makes this action a matter for a civil penalty ($1,000 limit), whereas para. (b) of 35 makes it a crime if you act "willfully and maliciously, or with reckless disregard for the safety of human life". You joke would not rise to the level of willful and malicious, but it could easily be found to be negligent, so you could get a civil penalty.

My alternative is to put up a sign "Keep Out: Testing Lasers fromSpace" which is a derivative of this idea and (IMO) would beconsidered humor. I know there is a line, how and where is that "line"defined?

This distinction captures the key point. If your sign stating "Active Mine Field" would, in the overall context, be understood as humor and not as a true statement of fact, it will be protected by the First Amendment.

If, however, someone is basically defrauded by a sign, because it appears to a reasonable person to be making a true statement of fact upon which a person reasonably relies to their detriment (or perhaps could reasonably rely to their detriment for criminal law purposes), then it is probably not protected.

For example, suppose that your "Active Minefield" sign causes the fire department, when responding to a wildfire next door to your property, to take the long way around your property or to call in the bomb squad at great expense. You could have civil liability as a result. Similarly, if the fire department refused to respond to a fire on your property due to such a sign, your insurance company might have a ground to deny your insurance claim for damages that a prompt fire department response could have prevented.

And @user6726 points out circumstances where there could be criminal liability, although there, as in the civil case, the First Amendment would require those criminal statutes to be employed in enough of a common sense fashion to only be invoked in cases where a reasonable person would believe the sign to be purporting to be a true statement of fact in the overall context of the situation, in order to withstand an "as applied" constitutional challenge to a facially valid statute.

So, a "space lasers" sign (at least as of 2022 when there are no such things) would probably not give rise to legal or civil liability, but an "Active Minefield" sign without something involved in the presentations to clearly indicate that it is a joke (or a fictional depiction for temporary theatrical purposes, for example) to a reasonable person, could result in civil or criminal liability.

Similarly, if the sign was very artistic and also had pictures of Bugs Bunny and Coyote chasing each other, and images of obviously fake "land mines", or if the sign were accompanied by a picture of cow turds everywhere that made clear that the "minefield" was a field full of excrement rather than high explosives, it wouldn't be actionable.

My understanding (IANAL) is that mines are legal but heavily regulated (to the point that they are de-facto illegal). If you pay all the fees, fill out all the forms, jump through all the hoops you can legally mine your property.

The law (as I understand it) requires you to clearly identify areas where mines are present (i.e., post those "Active Minefield" signs). It does not require you to not post areas where mines are not present.

Indeed, I suspect that many of those "mine fields" near the Korean DMZ (both sides) are not mined. The "defenders" know (or should know) which "mine fields" are really mined and which are not. The "attackers" can not be sure. This is in compliance with international law as long as all the "real mine fields" are adequately signed.

However, there are a variety of disadvantages. One that others have not mentioned is that an "Active Mine Field" sign might be primae facie evidence that you have a mine field. The government can quickly check its records and determine that if you have a mine field it is an illegal mine field. Let's take this to a judge and get a warrant. We will call in specialists and (extremely carefully) dig up every square inch of your property looking for those illegal mines.

Looks like you do not have any mines. Your property is a mess - not the government's problem. It is hard to imagine any legal irregularities escaping the extreme scrutiny that your search team put your property through. Here are a bunch of citations for the violations noted.

In her trademark political and playful style, Lola Arias brings together British and Argentinian veterans of the Falkland Islands/Islas Malvinas war to share their first-hand experience of the conflict and life since. Digging deep into the personal impact of war, Minefield is a collaboratively created new work that merges theatre and film to explore the minefield of memory, where truth and fiction collide.

This engagement of Lola Arias is funded through Southern Exposure: Performing Arts of Latin America, a program of Mid Atlantic Arts Foundation in partnership with The National Endowment for the Arts. Supported by British Council and Embajada de la Repblica Argentina en Gran Bretaa e Irlanda del Norte.

H-40.Most types of obstacles do not cause casualties directly. Minefields do have this potential, and will cause direct casualties if not reduced. Buried mines usually are found in a highly prepared defense. When training the reduction of surface-laid and buried minefields, always assume the presence of AHDs and trip wires until proven otherwise.

H-43.Physical detection (probing) is time-consuming and is used primarily for mine-clearing operations, self-extraction, and covert breaching operations. Detection of mines by visual or electronic methods should be confirmed by probing. 152ee80cbc

where is the party hd video song download

eset file security 4.5 download

get out of my way kgf lyrics download