Hybrid wing-body vehicles offer significant performance and efficiency increases over traditional tube-and-wing aircraft. However, the cost and risk associated with developing an all-new architecture for a commercial aircraft dictates that the manufacturer must make a significant effort to ensure that the resulting vehicle will out-compete all other aircraft in its class, especially in terms of fuel burn and acquisition price.
My team analyzed the performance and capabilities of a 300-passenger large twin-aisle hybrid wing-body aircraft. After determining that there were no possible avenues to meet all of our desired performance targets by altering the characteristics baseline vehicle, we proceeded with a TIES analysis to evaluate the potential of technology infusions to open up the design space.
First, we created a series of surrogate models in order to remove the need for repeated costly queries to the modelling environment. Next, we investigated the potential impact of a large number of technologies on the baseline design. In order to manage the intractable technology space, we employed a multi-objective genetic algorithm to select a number of Pareto-optimal design alternatives under certain constraints. Finally, a favored design was selected from the population using a variety of multi-attribute decision making techniques.
Our final technology package introduces damage arresting stitched composites on the fuselage and wing of the aircraft, which reduce empty weight, and thus acquisition price, and enable the construction of a complex fuselage shape. A compressor intercooler is added to the engine core in order to drastically reduce harmful emissions and ensure the aircraft design is robust against any future NOx regulations. Finally, hybrid laminar flow control was added to the wing using discrete roughness elements, which significantly improves the cruise performance of the vehicle, and thus reduces fuel burn and operating cost. The result is a vehicle that performs better than any on the market today at a lower cost, which we believe is significant motive to prompt the development of said vehicle.
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF A FIXED-WING AIRCRAFT
Sizing and Synthesis through Constraint Analysis and Mission Analysis
The main aspect of the aircraft design project life cycle explored is the sizing and synthesis of the vehicle. A design tool has been created in Microsoft Excel that is capable of properly sizing an aircraft to an efficient takeoff weight while also satisfying the mission objectives. Two different missions have been created in the same Excel file to test the versatility of the tool, where both missions undergo a constraint analysis and a mission analysis.
In the constraint analysis, the aircraft satisfies a set of phases in its given mission profile. Appropriate cases are incorporated into the tool, allowing for the output of the thrust loading (T/W) and wing loading (W/S). Once these parameters are found, the mission analysis can be conducted to figure out the fuel burn consumption of the vehicle during this mission. The thrust loading and wing loading retrieved from the constraint analysis become inputs for the mission analysis, allowing for the calculation of the weight fraction of the aircraft at the end of each mission phase. At this point, the takeoff weight can be calculated, leading to the required fuel weight. This process iterates until the required fuel weight falls within a specified tolerance to the fuel weight available.
The first mission will benchmark a military fighter aircraft against the concept and design of a F86-L Sabre fighter aircraft. This design must satisfy mission phases provided in the project description that would typically be conducted by a fighter aircraft. By the end of the sizing and synthesis process, the goal is to create a fighter aircraft with a conceptual design that matches the actual design of the F86-L Sabre fighter aircraft. Certain key characteristics, such as the predicted maximum required thrust at sea level and the predicted wing area, will be compared to the actual result to test the accuracy of the Excel tool.
The second mission will size a pilot trainer aircraft through a similar process to the benchmark exercise. In this case, the objective is to create a two-person crew aircraft that has the capabilities of a typical combat fighter aircraft and can complete similar missions, which is used to teach a new pilot how to fly in real-life conditions. There are currently no 2-seat pilot training aircraft, such as the F-22 or F-35, that have the capabilities to satisfy the design objectives. The F-16 is the current model of this training mission, but needs to have a suitable replacement for when it is no longer used for this task. This aircraft will also undergo a constraint analysis and a mission analysis, but the main distinction is that an engine must be selected for this aircraft, which can satisfy all mission objectives. This training aircraft should train the pilots in basic aircraft control, airmanship, formation, cockpit resource management and many other key aspects discussed in the project description.