Confounding vs. effect modification

Confounding and effect modification are two concepts that are often discussed in the context of epidemiological and observational studies. Both are sources of bias that can affect the relationship between an exposure and an outcome of interest.

Confounding occurs when an extraneous variable, known as a confounder, is related to both the exposure and the outcome, and it affects the observed association between them. In other words, the confounder is a variable that distorts or masks the true effect of the exposure on the outcome. Confounding can lead to false conclusions about the relationship between the exposure and the outcome, and it can be controlled by adjusting for the confounding variable through study design or statistical analysis.

Effect modification, on the other hand, occurs when the relationship between an exposure and an outcome is different depending on the level of another variable, known as an effect modifier. In other words, the effect of the exposure on the outcome is not the same for all levels of the effect modifier. Effect modification is important because it can help to identify subgroups of the population who are more or less susceptible to the exposure or who may benefit more or less from an intervention. Unlike confounding, effect modification is not a source of bias, but rather a feature of the relationship between the exposure and the outcome.

To distinguish between confounding and effect modification, researchers need to examine the nature of the relationship between the exposure, the outcome, and the potential confounder or effect modifier. Confounding occurs when the potential confounder is associated with both the exposure and the outcome, whereas effect modification occurs when the effect of the exposure on the outcome varies across different levels of the effect modifier.

References: