Social meaning and indexicality: across subfields, theories, and methods
In sociolinguistic theory, the notion of socio-indexical meaning designates ‘the stances, personal characteristics, and personas indexed through the deployment of linguistic forms’ (Podesva 2011). Research in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology has highlighted the fluid, contingent nature of social meanings, showing how speakers can creatively recruit and recombine linguistic resources to make social moves and construct identities (Silverstein 2003, Eckert 2008, 2012). On this view, the link between linguistic forms and social meanings is informed by a variety of social, ideological and cultural factors that are central to the life of language users within a particular community (Eckert 1989, 2000; Eckert & McConnell-Ginet 1995; Zhang 2005; Campbell-Kibler 2007; Podesva 2007, Coates & Cameron 2014, among others).
A growing body of research has recently begun investigating how social meanings are linked to the structural, language-internal properties of the expressions that carry them, and to what extent a social perspective on meaning can shed light on classic topics in semantics and pragmatics such as definiteness (Acton 2014), gradability (Beltrama and Staum Casasanto 2017), alternative-based and game-theoretic reasoning (Acton and Potts 2014, McCready 2015, Burnett 2017), markedness (Bender 2001 Campbell-Kibler 2007, Podesva 2011), modality (Glass 2015), pragmatic precision (Beltrama 2018), slurs and identity terms (McCready 2010, Candea 2016, McConnell-Ginet, 2002, 2006, forthcoming), questions (Cameron et al. 1988, Cameron 1998, Moore & Podesva 2009, Freed & Ehrlich 2010) and prosody (McConnell-Ginet 1978, Arnold & Candea 2015, Levon 2016, Jeong 2018).
Building on this momentum, we believe there is much to gain from encouraging further discussion on how the study of social meanings can be enriched with analytical and methodological tools typically used to investigate the structure and processing of other layers of meaning ; and how, conversely, the study of social meaning can yield a novel perspective on phenomena that have been traditionally seen as pertaining to semantics and pragmatics. In the same vein, we would also like to draw attention to the importance of fostering interaction between scholars that draw on different traditions -- e.g., semantics, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, discourse analysis -- to investigate essentially similar meaning-related phenomena -- e.g., the linguistic communication of emotions; the ascription of epistemic and affective stances to the interlocutor; the negotiation of how discourse should or could continue; slurs and subjective language; deixis and indexicality. To encourage this type of conversations, we thus invite submissions from scholars that are concerned with exploring the emergence and circulation of meaning from a broad range of conceptual and methodological perspectives. We especially encourage submissions that aim to do so by incorporating insights and methods drawn from across different linguistic subfields, including phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, and language processing.
We are excited to be joined by the following invited speakers:
Maria Candea (Maîtresse de conférences, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle)
Deborah Cameron (Rupert Murdoch Professor of Language and Communication, University of Oxford)
Sally McConnell-Ginet (Professor Emerita, Cornell University)
Authors are invited to submit abstracts for talks relevant to the workshop’s topics by January 15th, 2019. The submission link is the following:
https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=mist2019
Abstracts are limited to 500 words (excluding figures, tables, and references). All content must fit on no more than 2 pages.
Organizers
Andrea Beltrama (Laboratoire de Linguistique Formelle, CNRS-Université Paris Diderot)
Heather Burnett (Laboratoire de Linguistique Formelle, CNRS-Université Paris Diderot)
Contact
References
Acton, Eric and Chris Potts. 2014. That straight talk: Sarah Palin and the sociolinguistics of demonstratives. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18: 3–31.
Acton, Eric. 2014. Pragmatics and the social meaning of determiners (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University).
Arnold, Aron and Maria Candea. 2015. Comment étudier l’influence des stéréotypes de genre et de race sur la perception de la parole?. Langage et société, (2), 75-96.
Beltrama, Andrea. 2018. Precision and speaker qualities. The social meaning of pragmatic detail. In press, Linguistics Vanguard.
Beltrama, Andrea and Laura Staum Casasanto. 2017. Totally tall sounds totally younger. intensifiers at the socio-semantic interface. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(2). 154–182.
Bender, Emily. 2001. Syntactic variation and linguistic competence: The case of AAVE copula absence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Stanford, California: Stanford University.
Burnett, Heather. 2017. Sociolinguistic interaction and identity construction: The view from game‐theoretic pragmatics. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 21(2), 238-271.
Cameron, Deborah. 1998. Is there any ketchup, Vera?': Gender, power and pragmatics. Discourse & Society, 9(4), 437-455.
Cameron, Deborah, Fiona McAlinden and Kathy O’Leary. 1988. Lakoff in context: The social and linguistic functions of tag questions. Women in their speech communities, 74-93.
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2007. Accent, (ing) and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82: 32–84.
Candea, M. (2016). La notion d’«accent de banlieue» à l’épreuve du terrain. Glottopol. Revue de sociolinguistique en ligne, (29), 13-26.
Coates, J., & Cameron, D. (2014). Women in their speech communities. Routledge.
Eckert, Penelope. 1989. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Identity in the High School. New York: Teachers College Press.
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Language Variation as Social Practice. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12: 453– 476.
Eckert, Penelope and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1995. Constructing meaning, constructing selves. Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self, 469-507.
Alice Freed and Susan Ehrlich (Eds.). 2010. Why do you ask?: The function of questions in institutional discourse. Oxford University Press.
Glass, Lelia. 2015. Strong necessity modals: Four socio-pragmatic corpus studies (Selected papers from NWAV 43). University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 21(2).
Jeong, Sunwoo. 2018. Intonation and sentence type conventions: Two types of rising declaratives. Journal of Semantics, 35(2), 305-356.
Jeong, Sunwoo. 2016. Conventions in prosody for affective meanings: Non-canonical terminal contours in English polar interrogatives. In Speech Prosody (pp. 907-911).
Levon, Erez. 2016. Gender, interaction and intonational variation: The discourse functions of High Rising Terminals in London. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(2), 133-163.
McConnell-Ginet, Sally. (forthcoming). Meaning and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McConnell-Ginet, S. (2006). Why defining is seldom ‘just semantics’. Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics in honor of Laurence R. Horn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 217-240.
McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 2002. Queering semantics: Definitional struggles. Language and sexuality: Contesting meaning in theory and practice, 137-60.
McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1978. Intonation in a man's world. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 3(3), 541-559.
McCready, Elin. 2015. Reliability in pragmatics (Vol. 4). Oxford Studies in Semantics and Pragmatics.
McCready, Elin. 2010. Varieties of conventional implicature. Semantics and Pragmatics, 3, 8-1.
Moore, Emma and Robert J. Podesva. 2009. Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions. Language in Society 38: 447–485.
Podesva, Robert J. 2011. Salience and the social meaning of declarative contours: Three case studies of gay professionals. Journal of English Linguistics 39: 233–264.
Zhang, Qing. 2005. A Chinese Yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society 34: 431–466.