By the time Interview With the Vampire was adapted into a series by AMC and premiered in 2022, Merrick, Blackwood Farm, and Blood Canticle had all been published. The rest of the Vampire Chronicles novels had also all been published, including the graphic novel, Claudia's Story. Anne Rice, to the heartbreak of the Parlor, and to Anne's family, friends, and fans all over the world, had passed away.
In the fall of 2022, the new series premiered on AMC. It was a somewhat revised version of Interview With the Vampire. Revised? Say what, now?
Well, for starters, the time period of the story moved from the late 18th century to the early 20th century. While the beginning was still set in New Orleans as it always had been (mostly), Louis de Pointe du Lac went from operating this type of business:
to this:
But does this mean Louis also continued to live where he worked?
Of course not.
For many years, bringing the Mayfair Witches to the screen had been something Anne Rice had wanted to see, and she even wrote early scripts for this anticipated project. Finally, on January 8, 2023, over a year after Anne's death, Anne Rice's Mayfair Witches premiered on AMC.
Something the two shows have done is to tuck in little surprises here and there, similar to the "Easter eggs" found on DVD Extras. Little references in episodes of one show to the other show. With Merrick, the Mayfair Witches were introduced slowly to the Vampire Chronicles. In their own little ways, the two AMC shows do something similar.
Anne Rice Immortal Universe at San Diego Comic-Con 2023 (Temple of Geek)
I cannot help but notice that for all the criticism of Mayfair Witches for diverging too much from the source material, Interview With the Vampire has done the same. How is it acceptable for one series but not the other? Why is it okay to rewrite characters' stories and sometimes even invent new characters in one series but not the other? Or change timelines? Or settings? Or geographical locations?
If it's so terribly upsetting for fans of Interview With the Vampire to even see anything from Mayfair Witches in Immortal Universe' social media, then why aren't they howling about a reference to the amount of brooms at the Mayfair sisters' house in SEASON. ONE. of Interview With the Vampire? Why does no one point out that exactly nowhere in the 1976 novel Interview With the Vampire is there a reference to anyone or anything "Mayfair"? That the Mayfair Witches do not appear anywhere in the Vampire Chronicles until a brief mention in Merrick, followed by their appearances in Blackwood Farm and Blood Canticle?
If diverging from the source material--the novels--is so unacceptable, then what does this look like to you? Adding even a small reference to the "Mayfair sisters" in the first season of Interview With the Vampire, based on the novel published in 1976 that had no mention of Mayfairs whatsoever is a divergence. A small divergence, but a divergence. The quip refers to characters in a novel Anne Rice did not publish until 1990. The Witching Hour was a novel she didn't even begin writing until sometime in the 1980's.
Of the two series, when it comes to timelines of the novels vs. the shows, it is actually Mayfair Witches that sticks much closer to the original timeline of the story. I realized that very recently as I was going through content during the migration of this website. This might end up being a sore spot for some, but I will say what I have to say. And what I am saying is that if the basis of criticism of one show is that it:
Diverged too far from the source material;
Changed names of characters;
Eliminated characters;
Added characters;
Changed backstories of major characters;
Altered timelines, in some cases significantly;
Altered settings and geographical locations; and/or
Mixed vampires and Mayfairs where there was no mix before.
Then the same criticism must be applied equally to the other show.
Because as much as the "Mayfair sisters" reference (which sounds so Hocus Pocus) never appeared in the 1976 novel Interview With the Vampire, there were no vampires in the original Lives of the Mayfair Witches series--The Witching Hour (1990), Lasher (1993) and Taltos (1994).
Both shows have their strong points and their weak points. Interview With the Vampire has been better received than Mayfair Witches. Both have also received criticism that when it comes to mainstream media, was earned. For all the flaws, though, there is no need to get nasty about them.
Not even when the occasional description of one of the shows as "badly written fanfiction" leads to the other show being described as "fanfiction".
Mouldings One also has plans for the historic Gallier house! In fact, they have quite a bit on the details of the house, including some historical photos of the interior in black and white. For those who would like to see the plans for the Gallier house, the link to them on Mouldings One is below:
Built in 1857, this was the home of architect James Gallier and his family. It is at 1132 Royal Street in New Orleans' French Quarter.
See a Show Me More Season 2 featurette by AMC+ on YouTube:
The Parisian Vampire Starter Pack (are the drinks complimentary?): A photographer from New Orleans...hmmm... Now that we've seen traces of the vampire Armand's mortal life in paintings in a Paris art gallery that hint at his mortal life as Amadeo, I wonder if there might at some point be references to a later witch turned vampire named Merrick...
Season 2 of Interview With the Vampire certified fresh by Rotten Tomatoes, glad tidings courtesy of Anne Rice's Immortal Universe.
That fanged tomato kind of reminds me of the Bunnicula series...
I TOLD you the Parlor is haunted.