If you want compact, flat-folding headphones with on-ear pads, choose Maxell UT-T 190249; if you need a secure in-ear fit with ear hooks and an inline remote, choose Philips A1105. For hunting, I’d lean toward the Maxell when packability and a simple wired design matter most. The Philips is the more practical choice when a snug fit and controls on the cord are priorities.
• Maxell UT-T 190249: Its slim metallic headband, pivoting earpieces, and flat-folding shape make it easy to pack; the trade-off is an on-ear fit rather than Philips’s hooked in-ear design.
• Philips A1105: Its flexible ear hooks, IPX2 sweat resistance, and inline remote suit movement; its in-ear fit may not suit listeners who prefer pads resting over their ears.
• Maxell is for: listeners who want compact wired headphones with on-ear pads and earpieces that can lie flat.
• Philips is for: listeners who want a wired headset that stays secured by ear hooks and offers cord-mounted controls.
The Maxell UT-T 190249 is a wired, on-ear headphone built around a slim metallic headband and compact earpieces. Those earpieces pivot and can lie flat, a useful combination when you want to slip headphones into a bag without carrying a bulky shape. Its soft pads rest on the ears, rather than sitting inside them.
Each earpiece has a 30mm Neodynamic driver. The product description characterizes the sound as clear and crisp, but the practical advantage I’d focus on is the straightforward over-ear-adjacent design: you don’t have to fit an in-ear tip into the ear canal, and the pads are described as accommodating different ear sizes, including smaller ears. That could matter for a listener who finds in-ear styles uncomfortable or difficult to keep in place.
For hunting, the Maxell’s compact, flat-folding construction can make sense as a simple wired headset to pack alongside other gear. It is not described with ear hooks, an inline remote, or sweat resistance, so I wouldn’t choose it specifically for active movement or wet conditions. Its on-ear pads are also the wrong fit if you want headphones secured around the ears.
Skip it if: you need ear hooks, cord-mounted controls, or stated sweat resistance.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-19 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
Philips A1105: Who It's For
The cable is 1.2 meters long and ends in a 3.5mm connector. There is an inline remote for media control, calls, and waking a phone’s voice assistant. Those features can be handy when the connected device is in a pocket or pack: you can use the cord’s controls rather than reaching for the device. The headphones are also described as IPX2 sweat-resistant, which makes them a more clearly specified option for sweaty activity than the Maxell. That does not make them waterproof; the stated protection is sweat resistance at IPX2.
The A1105 has 15mm dynamic drivers, a listed frequency range of 20–20,000 Hz, and 16-ohm impedance. These are concrete audio specifications, but they don’t by themselves establish which pair will sound better to a particular listener. The Philips description calls out deep bass and open acoustics; the useful distinction for choosing is that it combines an in-ear fit with movement-oriented hooks, a microphone and remote, and sweat resistance. Its trade-off is that listeners who prefer on-ear pads or a flat-folding headband may find the Maxell’s format a better match.
Skip it if: you don’t want an in-ear fit or prefer a headphone that folds flat instead of using ear hooks.
• Best for a compact, flat-folding design → Maxell UT-T 190249. Its earpieces pivot and can lie flat, while its headband is slim and metallic.
• Best for a fit designed to stay secure during movement → Philips A1105. Its flexible, contoured ear hooks are adjustable and intended to help hold the in-ear earpieces in place.
• Best for on-ear pads → Maxell UT-T 190249. The pads rest gently on the ears, which may suit people who don’t want an in-ear design.
• Best for an inline remote and calls → Philips A1105. Its cord-mounted controls support media control, calls, and access to a phone’s voice assistant.
• Best for stated sweat resistance → Philips A1105. It is specified as IPX2 sweat-resistant; the Maxell’s listed features do not include a sweat-resistance rating.
• Best for a larger listed driver → Maxell UT-T 190249. It has a 30mm driver in each earpiece, compared with the Philips’s 15mm drivers. Driver size alone doesn’t settle sound quality.
• Best for a 3.5mm connection → Philips A1105. Its connector is explicitly listed as 3.5mm. Both products are wired, but that specific connector detail is provided for the Philips.
• Best for a headset to pack for hunting → Maxell UT-T 190249 if compact storage is the priority; Philips A1105 if a secure hooked fit and inline controls matter more. The better choice depends on whether you value its fold-flat shape or its movement-oriented design.
Start with the fit, not the driver number. The Maxell rests on the ears; the Philips uses in-ear earpieces held with hooks. Those are meaningfully different ways to wear headphones, and comfort is personal. If in-ear headphones tend not to work for you, the Philips’s ear hooks don’t change the fact that its earpieces fit in the ear. If you dislike pads resting on your ears, the Maxell may be the less suitable option.
Think next about how you’ll use the headset. The Philips is more clearly equipped for activity: the hooks are intended to help secure the fit while moving, and the IPX2 specification addresses sweat resistance. Its inline remote and microphone add practical functions when your phone is tucked away. The Maxell makes a simpler case through its pivoting, flat-folding earpieces and on-ear pads. For hunting, that can be useful when you want a compact wired pair to carry, but neither sheet establishes sound isolation, hearing protection, or suitability for every hunting situation. Don’t assume either product replaces dedicated hearing protection.
Cable and device compatibility matter too. The Philips comes with a 1.2-meter cord and a 3.5mm connector, so confirm that your intended device has a compatible jack. Both models are wired, which means the sheets do not describe wireless listening. The Philips also lists an inline remote; no corresponding remote is specified for the Maxell. If you regularly adjust playback or take calls from the cable, that difference is significant.
Finally, don’t treat driver diameter as a verdict on sound. The Maxell’s 30mm drivers and Philips’s 15mm drivers are useful points of comparison, but driver size alone doesn’t tell you how either pair will sound in your ears. The product descriptions make different claims and emphasize different designs. If price is part of your decision, check the current price on Amazon rather than relying on an outdated figure; then weigh it against the fit and features you’ll actually use.
I’d choose the Maxell UT-T 190249 for hunting if my priority were a compact wired pair with on-ear pads and earpieces that lie flat for packing. Its design makes that use case straightforward, without pretending it offers Philips’s movement-focused features. If I needed ear hooks, sweat resistance, and an inline remote, I’d choose the Philips A1105 instead. My pick is Maxell, but only for the packable on-ear format.
FAQ
For a compact pair to pack, the Maxell’s pivoting earpieces and flat-folding design are appealing. For movement, the Philips adds adjustable ear hooks and stated IPX2 sweat resistance. Neither is described as hearing protection.
Its listed age range is 12+, and it has adjustable ear hooks, an inline remote, and a 3.5mm connector. Those details don’t establish that it is suitable for a particular child or a specific hunting environment; fit and hearing protection need separate consideration.
The Philips A1105 is the one specifically designed with flexible ear hooks to help secure its in-ear earpieces during movement. The Maxell instead uses on-ear pads and a headband, with no ear hooks listed.
Neither product sheet identifies gaming features or establishes that either is the best gaming headphone. The Philips has an inline remote and microphone, while the Maxell emphasizes a compact on-ear design. Choose based on fit and the controls you need, and check that the connector works with your device.
• our Linsoul 7Hz vs FiiO /JadeAudio JT1 pick
• SteelSeries Arctis Nova Elite vs Sony WH-1000XM6
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.