Welcome to the Math Student Lunch Seminar of VU Amsterdam!
This is a self-organized seminar where students can share their passion for math in an informal setting.
The format is simple:
Short talk about an interesting topic by an expert or a student
Free pizza (or you can bring your food) and cosy chat
When?
Every other Thursday at 1pm
Where?
Room NU building. The exact room depends on the day. See below.
Interested?
Fill in this form, if you are interested in any of the following three things:
Sign up to the mailing list of the seminar for updates on the forthcoming talks.
Suggest a topic or a speaker or be a speaker
Help with the organization
You can also contact us at math.student.seminar.vu@gmail.com
Talks Fall 2025
Abstract
In the field of (algebraic) topology, we try to map out the complicated galaxy that is the collection of all topological spaces - that is, we try to find all mathematically possible shapes. One very interesting solar system is the collection of manifolds, which are particularly nice shapes that come with a dimension. You would expect that, as you increase the dimension, the shapes will get more complicated. But this does not really turn out to be the case. Actually, it is the four-dimensional manifolds that give us the most trouble. In this talk, I'll give a brief introduction to the study of manifolds. I'll show why the first few dimensions are mostly harmless, while the high dimensions are doable, so long as you carry the right tools.
Abstract
How can we find patterns in complicated data, such as recordings of brain activity? One way is to use tools from topology. Persistent homology is a method that looks for shapes and loops hidden in data and records how long they “survive” as we zoom in and out. These long-lasting features often reveal something essential about the data. In this talk, I will introduce the main ideas of persistent homology without assuming background knowledge, and then show how it can be applied to neuroscience.
Abstract
Mathematics is not immune to mistakes. With lengthy, complex, and increasingly technical proofs, errors can go unnoticed for years even after a paper has been peer-reviewed. This raises a natural question: could we use computers to check the correctness of a mathematical proof? Formalization is the process of encoding mathematics into a formal language, enabling proofs to be mechanically verified by a computer. In this talk, I will give an introduction to the formalization of mathematics using proof assistants (interactive software suitable for this task), with a particular focus on Lean. I will also discuss some of the ways this technology can contribute to mathematical practice.
Abstract
Finding integer solutions to equations with integer coefficients, so-called Diophantine equations, is the essence of number theory; it is the predecessor to arithmetic geometry. There is no algorithm that decides whether such equations admit integer solutions, and the process of determining solubility can be difficult.
On the other hand, it is often easier to check if an equation admits solutions over a finite field. Simply put, the Hasse principle postulates that the solutions over finite fields are necessary and sufficient to determine if there are solutions over the integers. We will explore various examples where the Hasse principle is valid and others where it fails. In the latter case, we provide some insight for why it fails to hold, especially in the case of elliptic curves.
Abstract
I will introduce category theory, and explain using examples how it unifies many of the topics studied during the math bachelor's degree. I will conclude with a fun fact that interprets the Fibonacci sequence as a (product-preserving) functor between categories.
Abstract
I will explain the general framework in which forensic statisticians typically work and apply this to the question of how strong a DNA-match actually is. Some beautiful probability theory is used to come to an answer, keeping in mind that there might be familial relationships in a population.
Talks Spring 2024
Abstract
What do a billiard game, the acoustic in a cathedral, and the light pattern in your cup of coffee have in common? They are all described by a straight line motion (of the ball, of the sound, of the light) that gets reflected at the boundary of a region. In this talk, we present the field of mathematical billiards, which aims at predicting the features of this motion. We will discover unexpected properties and an interesting interplay between order and chaos.
Videos
Octagon, Blocking Problem,Tokarsky Billiard, Elliptic Billiard, Sinai billiard, Bunimovich Stadium
Abstract
In this talk, I will introduce the field of Algebraic Number Theory, focusing on the role of prime ideals, which provides a deeper understanding beyond the traditional concept of prime numbers. Through this lens, we will explore one of the Mordell equations: y^3+11 =x^2 and work through the process of finding all integral solutions. This approach will highlight how Algebraic Number Theory can be applied to solve Diophantine equations.
Abstract
In classical physics the future could be predicted with all detail in case the state of the universe was fully known, leading to the loss of free will and other philosophical consequences. With the onset of quantum physics at the start of the last century, it became clear that chance is immanently built into physics. However, there is still no satisfactory model for it. In my talk I will discuss two very different approaches to the probabilistic content of quantum theory and how I plan to explore both approaches with the help of my new research grant.
Abstract
Philosophy and Mathematics are two seemingly different disciplines with no apparent connection to one another. However, from antiquity onwards, mathematics has been the subject of significant philosophical inquiry and a source of deep dispute among philosophers. The purpose of this talk is twofold. First, we will focus on how answering standard philosophical questions about mathematics is no easy feat. Second, we will briefly present how the area of the foundations of mathematics, specifically set theory, is ripe for both mathematical and philosophical exploration.
Abstract
Since the 1990s, a lot of work has gone into developing the hardware and software for quantum computers, which are based on quantum-mechanical effects like superposition, interference, and entanglement. However, quantum techniques have also been useful for proving results in diverse areas of mathematics and computer science, such as coding theory, complexity theory, and polynomial approximations, that have little to do with quantum mechanics. This is somewhat reminiscent of the "probabilistic method" where one uses tools from probability theory to prove theorems that have nothing to do with probability, such as the existence of graphs with certain properties. It has the added advantage that one doesn't need to actually build a physical quantum computer for it; the mathematical rules of the game suffice. In this talk I will introduce this quantum way of thinking and sketch some of the results that came out of it.
Abstract
A spatial graph is the image of an embedding of a graph in a 3-manifold. A given graph may have many different embeddings: An easy example are differently knotted embeddings of a circle into R3. If we allow for more complicated graphs, we encounter notions of entanglement that are not caused by knotting. We will look at these different notions of entanglements and explore some examples.
Abstract
Einstein’s theory of special relativity completely transformed the way we think about time and space. In this talk, we’ll explore the underlying philosophy through some of Einstein’s famous thought experiments and uncover a few of its more baffling consequences. Along the way, we’ll also meet some of the key mathematical tools involved, like invariant intervals and Lorentz transformations. No prior knowledge of physics is assumed — just a willingness to question your intuition (and maybe your watch).