"Unpacking the Distributional Implications of the Energy Crisis: Lessons from the Iberian Electricity Market." With Natalia Fabra (CEMFI) and Clément Leblanc (Universidad Carlos III de Madrid).
CEPR Discussion Paper 20593
Abstract: The 2021-2023 European energy crisis, triggered by the war in Ukraine, led to broad policy interventions in energy markets. In contrast to the retail-side measures and public transfers implemented elsewhere, Spain and Portugal targeted the wholesale electricity market through the so-called Iberian solution. We quantify the distributional implications of the crisis and this market intervention on Spanish electricity firms and across consumer groups. We find that the crisis shifted substantial wealth from consumers to generators, with regressive impacts among consumers. Conversely, the policy’s relief was progressive, delivering larger gains to lower-income groups.
"The Tragedy of the Common Heating Bill." With Harald Mayr (University of Zurich).
SSRN Working Paper 5062970
CRC Discussion Paper 629/2025
Abstract: We study free-riding in buildings without apartment-specific heat meters, such that tenants have to share a common heating bill. A novel data set allows us to analyze the staggered rollout of submetering and individual billing. Our estimates suggest that individual billing reduced heating expenses by 17%, on average. Machine learning techniques reveal substantial effect heterogeneity, with minimal response among tenants in smaller buildings. Our results suggest that only a minority of households exploits the free-riding incentive. Nevertheless, submetering improves welfare for most buildings when we account for the social cost of carbon.
Energy Efficiency Can Deliver for Climate Policy: Evidence from Machine Learning-Based Targeting.
With Peter Christensen, Paul Francisco, Erica Myers, and Hansen Shao.
2024; Journal of Public Economics 234, 105098.
NBER Working Paper 30467
Abstract: Building energy efficiency has been a cornerstone of greenhouse gas mitigation strategies for decades. However, impact evaluations have revealed that energy savings typically fall short of engineering model forecasts that currently guide funding decisions. This creates a resource allocation problem that impedes progress on climate change. Using data from the largest U.S. energy efficiency program, we demonstrate that a data-driven approach to predicting retrofit impacts based on previously realized outcomes is more accurate than the status quo engineering models. Targeting high-return interventions based on these predictions dramatically increases net social benefits, from $0.93 to $1.23 per dollar invested.
Observed Patterns of Free-Floating Car-Sharing Use.
With Natalia Fabra and Catarina Pintassilgo.
2024; SERIEs (Journal of the Spanish Economic Association) 15: 259–297.
CRC Discussion Paper 512/2024; Replication Package
Abstract: Free-Floating Car-Sharing (FFCS) services allow users to rent electric vehicles by the minute without restrictions on pick-up or drop-off locations within the service area of the rental company. Beyond enlarging the choice set of mobility options, FFCS may reduce congestion and emissions in cities, depending on the service's usage and substitution patterns. In this paper, we shed light on this by analyzing the universe of FFCS trips conducted through a leading company in Madrid during 2019. We correlate FFCS usage patterns with data on traffic conditions, demographics, and public transit availability across the city. We find complementarities between FFCS and public transport in middle-income areas with scarce public transport options. Moreover, we find that the use of FFCS peaks earlier than overall traffic and is broadly used during the summer months. This suggests that FFCS may have smoothed road traffic in Madrid, contributing to a reduction in overall congestion.
Decomposing the Wedge Between Projected and Realized Returns in Energy Efficiency Programs.
With Peter Christensen, Paul Francisco, and Erica Myers.
2023; The Review of Economics and Statistics 105 (4): 798–817.
Abstract: Evaluations of energy efficiency programs reveal that realized savings consistently fall short of projections. We decompose this 'performance wedge' using data from the Illinois Home Weatherization Assistance Program (IHWAP) and a machine learning-based event study research design. We find that bias in engineering models can account for up to 41% of the wedge, primarily from overestimated savings in wall insulation. Heterogeneity in workmanship can also account for a large fraction (43%) of the wedge, while the rebound effect can explain only 6%. We find substantial heterogeneity in energy-related benefits from IHWAP projects, suggesting opportunities for better targeting of investments.
Air Pollution from Agricultural Fires Increases Hypertension Risk.
With Hemant K. Pullabhotla.
2022; Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 115, 102723.
Abstract: In many parts of the developing world, farmers widely use deliberate fires to burn vegetation and clear land to plant crops. These agricultural fires, however, are known to be associated with health costs due to increased air pollution. We contribute to underpinning the associated health cost estimates by studying the effects of these fires on hypertension risk. Despite being one of the leading causes of mortality globally, there is little direct evidence on how hypertension risk changes with exposure to pollution from agricultural fires. To overcome common data and empirical challenges in this setting, we match blood pressure readings from nearly 784,000 individuals across India with satellite data on 1.2 million agricultural fires, wind direction realizations, and local ambient air pollution. We find that the incidence of hypertension increases by 1.8% for each standard deviation increase in the number of upwind fires observed one day before the blood pressure readings. We find that the impact is stronger among older males, smokers, individuals that were already on blood pressure medication, and individuals belonging to socially marginalized groups. Our estimates suggest that agricultural fires in India lead to hypertension-related additional mortality, associated with USD 9 billion annually in costs.
The Implicit Cost of Carbon Abatement During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
With Natalia Fabra and Aitor Lacuesta.
2022; European Economic Review 147, 104165.
Abstract: This paper provides novel estimates of the implicit cost of carbon abatement associated with the COVID-19 crisis. We compare that to the costs from renewable investments that would lead to similar abatement. Focusing on the Spanish economy and its power sector, we combine machine learning and simulation tools to construct a precise counterfactual of market performance in absence of the crisis. Results suggest that power sector CO2 emissions fell by 4.13 Million Tons (about 11.5%) during 2020 due to the pandemic, less than half of the actual year-on-year emissions reductions. Investing in renewables to achieve similar carbon abatement would yield an implicit cost of 60-65 Euro/Ton of CO2. Conversely, the pandemic caused a substantial GDP loss in Spain, relative to the extent of overall carbon abatement. The resulting cost of carbon abatement associated with the pandemic thus exceeded 7 thousand Euro/Ton.
Social Comparison Nudges Without Monetary Incentives: Evidence from Home Energy Reports.
With Erica Myers.
2020; Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 101, 102315.
Abstract: We explore the mechanisms driving the effectiveness of a widely-used behavioral intervention that reduces energy consumption by repeatedly mailing social comparison-based home energy reports (HERs) to households. With a randomized controlled trial, we introduce HERs in a college residence, where tenants do not pay energy bills. Our results indicate that HERs induced almost no behavioral changes for heating demand, with precise estimates that allow us to rule out thermostat changes greater than 0.36ᵒF. This suggests that behavioral channels, such as competitiveness, social norms, or moral suasion, may not motivate conservation in the absence of direct monetary incentives.
Why are Rented Dwellings Less Energy-Efficient? Evidence from a Representative Sample of the U.S. Housing Stock.
2018; Energy Policy 118, pp. 149-159.
Abstract: This paper compares energy-efficient appliance adoption rates across U.S. residential markets. The focus is to explore variation across tenure modes (rented or owner-occupied residences). Bivariate probits are used to correct for endogenous determination of tenure mode and energy efficiency outcomes. Results suggest that, when compared to renters, homeowners are significantly more likely to have energy-efficient appliances. The mechanisms that could be driving those differences are also investigated. Heterogeneity analyses reveal that rented dwellings are more likely to have efficient appliances when landlords incur utility payments. Adoption rate differences are also shown to be inversely related to energy prices. Those findings are consistent with a problem of asymmetric information in the housing market, typically referred to as the “landlord-tenant problem.” This paper is also the first to assess how tenancy duration influences efficiency investments in this context. Results suggest that investments in rented homes are more likely to occur at later periods of tenancy, when relations between landlords and tenants might be better established.
"The Welfare Effects of Car-Sharing." With Natalia Fabra (CEMFI) and Erich Muehlegger (University of California, Davis).