How We Research
Updated: 2026-09-22 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
If you want a sports earbud that keeps its grip when you're dripping sweat on a treadmill, choose Matast Earbuds Sports; if you need marathon-grade battery life and a four-microphone call setup for long outdoor sessions, choose Qecnato 75H. Both are Bluetooth 5.4 ear-hook designs with IP7 waterproofing, so the real decision comes down to fit philosophy and how many hours you actually spend away from a charger.
• Matast Earbuds Sports — biggest strength: A flexible ear-hook fit paired with 13mm drivers and ENC mics, tuned for people who move hard and want the bud to stay put.
• Matast Earbuds Sports — biggest trade-off: 10 hours per charge and 60 hours total from the case is generous, but it trails the Qecnato's stamina.
• Qecnato 75H — biggest strength: 15 hours per charge and up to 75 hours with the case, plus a four-mic ENC array and larger 14.2mm drivers.
• Qecnato 75H — biggest trade-off: Its "over ear" ear-hook design leans on soft silicone hooks, which some listeners find bulkier than a standard in-ear bud for everyday wear.
• Pick Matast Earbuds Sports if you want a sporty, secure in-ear fit with three ear-cap sizes and don't mind charging a bit more often.
• Pick Qecnato 75H if you want maximum playtime, bigger drivers, and a four-microphone call setup for work and workouts alike.
The Matast Earbuds Sports is built around one idea: stay in your ear no matter what. The design uses flexible, secure-fit ear hooks combined with an in-ear shape and three sizes of ear caps, so you can dial in a snug seal instead of hoping a one-size bud holds on. For gym work, running, or anything where you tilt your head and move fast, that ear-hook-plus-ear-cap combination is the part that matters most. Add IP7 nano-coating against sweat, splashes, and rain, and it's clearly aimed at people who treat their earbuds as workout gear first and music gear second.
Inside, Matast uses a 13mm dynamic driver with a 10-ohm impedance. A low impedance like that means the buds don't demand much power to get loud, which is handy when you're pairing with a phone instead of a dedicated player. The ENC microphone setup is specified to cancel around 80% of background noise passively, so calls from a noisy street or a busy gym floor should come through more clearly for the person on the other end. Bluetooth 5.4 handles the connection with a 15-meter range and support for HFP, HSP, A2DP, and AVRCP.
Battery is where the Matast makes its compromise. You get up to 10 hours on a single charge, extending to 60 hours with the charging case, and a full recharge in about 1.5 hours over Type-C. The dual LED display shows both the case's remaining power and the earbuds' charging progress, which is a small but genuinely useful touch. Touch controls cover play/pause, calls, track skipping, and voice assistant. If you want a secure fit and you're fine charging every few days, this is the one to look at. If you want to go a week or more between charges, skip it.
The Qecnato 75H goes after endurance. It claims up to 15 hours on a single charge and up to 75 hours total with the case — enough that a heavy user can go a long stretch without thinking about a wall outlet. Charging is the same story as the Matast: Type-C, about 1.5 hours to full, and a dual LED display for both the case and the bud charging status. If your routine involves long outdoor runs, all-day wear, or travel where you'd rather not hunt for a charger, that extra headroom is the headline feature.
Audio hardware is a step up on paper. The 75H uses 14.2mm dynamic drivers — larger than the Matast's 13mm — paired with 32-ohm impedance. Bigger drivers generally move more air and can produce deeper bass, which fits the "deep bass" framing in its own description. The 32-ohm impedance means it wants a bit more power than the Matast's 10-ohm design, but phones handle that fine. On calls, Qecnato uses a four-microphone ENC array rather than a single-mic setup, which is the kind of configuration that typically helps isolate your voice in traffic, at the gym, or in an open office.
The fit is where you need to think honestly. Qecnato labels these "over ear" with ear hooks made from soft silicone, and the enclosure is ABS plastic. Ear-hook designs are secure, but some people find the hook pressure noticeable over long sessions compared to a plain in-ear bud. The included accessories are practical — a portable charging box, silicone ear tips in S/M/L, a USB-C cable, and a manual. It supports the same core Bluetooth protocols and a 15-meter range, and it adds volume adjustment to its touch controls alongside the usual play/pause, call, track, and voice-assistant commands. If you want the longest playtime and the bigger driver, this is your pick. If you prefer a lighter in-ear feel, it may not be.
• Best for battery life → Qecnato 75H. 15 hours per charge and 75 hours total beats the Matast's 10 and 60.
• Best for secure sporty fit → Matast Earbuds Sports. Flexible ear hooks plus three ear-cap sizes give you more ways to lock in the seal.
• Best for call clarity → Qecnato 75H. A four-microphone ENC array is more microphone hardware than Matast's ENC setup.
• Best for bass and driver size → Qecnato 75H. 14.2mm drivers out-size Matast's 13mm.
• Best for easy phone pairing and loudness on low power → Matast Earbuds Sports. Its 10-ohm impedance is easier to drive.
• Best for lighter everyday wear → Matast Earbuds Sports. The in-ear shape with ear hooks tends to feel less bulky than a pronounced over-ear hook.
• Best for long travel and all-day use → Qecnato 75H. The bigger case capacity is the deciding factor here.
• Tie on waterproofing and charging → both. Both are IP7 with Type-C and roughly 1.5-hour charge times.
In my opinion, the Qecnato 75H is the better all-rounder for most people. The 75-hour total playtime, the four-microphone ENC array, and the larger 14.2mm drivers are meaningful advantages for anyone who uses earbuds across workouts, commutes, and calls. I'd choose the Matast Earbuds Sports specifically if fit security is your top priority and you prefer a lighter in-ear feel with three ear-cap options. If battery anxiety is something you hate, go Qecnato. Otherwise, both are solid Bluetooth 5.4 sport buds — check the current price on Amazon before you commit.
Both are IP7 waterproof with ear hooks, so both handle sweat and rain. The Qecnato lasts longer per charge; the Matast offers three ear-cap sizes for a more customizable in-ear seal. It comes down to whether you value stamina or fit tuning more.
Matast rates up to 10 hours per charge and 60 hours with the case. Qecnato rates up to 15 hours per charge and 75 hours with the case. Both fully recharge in about 1.5 hours via Type-C.
Yes. Matast uses ENC microphones specified to cancel around 80% of background noise passively. Qecnato uses a four-microphone ENC array. The Qecnato's extra mics give it an edge on paper for noisy call environments.
Value depends on what you need and on the current price, which you can check on Amazon. If you want maximum battery and more microphone hardware, Qecnato fits. If you want a lighter in-ear fit with more ear-cap options, Matast fits.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.
See also: Matast Earbuds vs OLLSPAKER Sport Earbuds, Matast Earbuds vs iMangoo USB C Headphones, POIUZET 5.3 vs Qecnato 75H