If you want a straightforward swim-ready headset with 32 GB of MP3 storage for kids, choose MARLALL Swimming Headphones-Bone Conduction; if you need more music storage, a fit designed to adjust for smaller heads, and more playback details, choose DOOGEEEco Bone Air Swim. Both require MP3 mode underwater, so neither streams Bluetooth music while submerged.
MARLALL Swimming Headphones-Bone Conduction vs DOOGEEEco Bone Air Swim at a Glance
• MARLALL’s biggest strength: 32 GB of built-in MP3 storage and an IP68 waterproof design for swimming; its main trade-off is that swimming requires MP3 mode, not Bluetooth.
• DOOGEEEco’s biggest strength: 64 GB of storage, a stated adjustable fit for small heads, and separate playback figures for wireless and MP3 modes; its main trade-off is that MP3 playback is listed as five hours at full volume.
• Both use Bluetooth 5.4 and bone conduction, and both require locally stored MP3 audio underwater.
• Choose MARLALL if you want a lightweight, uncomplicated option for swimming and everyday outdoor use.
• Choose DOOGEEEco if extra storage, small-head adjustability, and included swimming accessories matter more.
MARLALL’s appeal is easy to understand: it combines an open-ear bone-conduction design with 32 GB of built-in MP3 storage and an IP68 waterproof rating. That makes it a practical candidate for someone who wants to bring audio into the pool without relying on a phone or Bluetooth signal underwater. The product information also lists a weight of 22.68 g, which is lighter than DOOGEEEco’s listed 26.5 g.
For a child who swims regularly, the main routine is simple in principle: save audio to the headphones and use MP3 mode in the water. Bluetooth 5.4 is available for listening and hands-free calling outside the water, with a stated range of up to 10 meters. The open-ear design does not seal the ears, which may suit a wearer who dislikes conventional in-ear headphones. The listing says swimming is intended with a cap and goggles.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
I’d consider MARLALL for families looking for a straightforward swim headset and for older kids who can manage their own stored playlists. I’d skip it if you want to stream from a phone while swimming, need a stated playback-time figure before choosing, or want an explicitly described adjustable strap for small heads. The listing also advises drying the microphone after swimming to help prevent call issues, so it is worth treating post-swim care as part of the routine.
DOOGEEEco offers twice the built-in storage of MARLALL, at 64 GB, and specifies MP3 playback for underwater listening. Its Bluetooth 5.4 connection is for use outside the water; wireless signals cannot travel through water, so the same basic swimming limitation applies. The product describes a dual-driver setup combining bone and air conduction. That may appeal to buyers who want a design intended to present both clear mids and highs and deeper bass, though those descriptions are not a substitute for a direct listening comparison.
Its fit details make it particularly relevant to families. DOOGEEEco lists silicone ear hooks and a titanium memory steel wire frame, and says the adjustable strap fits small heads, including women’s and kids’ heads. The listed weight is 26.5 g. The package also includes swimming earplugs, an anti-slip strap, a hard storage case, a magnetic charging cable, and a manual. For a parent managing pool gear, those included pieces could make the set feel more ready to organize and carry.
Battery information is more specific here than in MARLALL’s listing: up to eight hours in wireless mode at 75% volume and five hours in MP3 mode at full volume. A 10-minute charge is stated to provide two hours of playback. DOOGEEEco specifies IP68 protection for immersion up to 2 meters for as long as two hours. I’d look closely at this model if adjustable fit, extra storage, and explicit playback figures are priorities. I’d skip it if you prefer a lighter listed headset or do not need its additional storage and accessories.
• Best for more built-in music storage → DOOGEEEco Bone Air Swim. It lists 64 GB, compared with MARLALL’s 32 GB.
• Best for a lighter listed weight → MARLALL Swimming Headphones-Bone Conduction. MARLALL is listed at 22.68 g; DOOGEEEco is listed at 26.5 g.
• Best for a fit explicitly described for small heads → DOOGEEEco Bone Air Swim. Its adjustable strap is described as fitting small heads, including kids.
• Best for swimming without a phone connection → Either one. Both support MP3 mode for underwater listening, and neither supports Bluetooth transmission underwater.
• Best for a family that wants stated battery figures → DOOGEEEco Bone Air Swim. Its listing gives separate playback estimates for wireless and MP3 use, plus a quick-charge figure.
• Best for a simpler swim-focused choice → MARLALL Swimming Headphones-Bone Conduction. It pairs IP68 protection with 32 GB of onboard storage and an open-ear bone-conduction design.
• Best for included pool accessories → DOOGEEEco Bone Air Swim. The package lists swimming earplugs, an anti-slip strap, and a hard case in addition to its charging cable and manual.
• Best low latency open ear headphones for kids? Neither listing provides a latency figure, so I would not choose between them on that basis. For swimming, the more important shared point is that audio must be stored and played in MP3 mode.
• Best open ear headphones for kids who also cycle or hike → Either, depending on fit needs. Both are presented for outdoor activities. DOOGEEEco spells out small-head adjustability; MARLALL lists a lower weight.
For a child, fit deserves more attention than a broad label like “kids’ headphones.” DOOGEEEco gives more detail about its adjustable strap and smaller-head fit. MARLALL’s lighter listed weight may be appealing, but its product information describes an adult age range, so parents should check the fit rather than assume it will suit every child. In either case, a secure, comfortable fit matters for swimming and active movement.
The audio descriptions also differ, but the available information does not establish which one sounds better in practice. MARLALL identifies a bone-conduction driver. DOOGEEEco describes a combination of bone and air conduction intended to provide clear mids and highs alongside deeper bass. If sound character is your deciding factor, treat that as a design distinction rather than a guaranteed result. The clearest spec-based differences are storage, fit details, listed weight, accessories, and battery information.
My Verdict
For a family shopping for swimming headphones for kids, I’d choose DOOGEEEco Bone Air Swim. In my opinion, its 64 GB storage, fit described for smaller heads, included swimming accessories, and mode-specific playback figures make it the more informative and adaptable package. The five-hour MP3 figure at full volume is still worth considering for longer pool days.
I’d choose MARLALL Swimming Headphones-Bone Conduction instead if lower listed weight and a simpler feature set matter more than extra storage or accessories. Both can serve a swimmer who is willing to use MP3 mode underwater, but DOOGEEEco is my pick for families who want more fit guidance in the product details.
No. Both listings say wireless signals cannot transmit underwater, so swimming audio needs to play from the headphones’ built-in storage in MP3 mode. Bluetooth is for use outside the water.
DOOGEEEco lists 64 GB of built-in storage, while MARLALL lists 32 GB. Both are intended to let you listen to stored audio underwater without a Bluetooth connection.
DOOGEEEco is the one that specifically describes an adjustable strap intended to fit small heads, including kids. MARLALL has a lower listed weight, but its product information gives an adult age range; check fit carefully rather than relying on weight alone.
DOOGEEEco lists up to eight hours in wireless mode at 75% volume and five hours in MP3 mode at full volume, plus two hours of playback from a 10-minute charge. MARLALL’s listing does not provide a playback-time figure, so there is no equivalent stated battery comparison.
• how OSSZIT 30 compares to Voerou 3D
• MIDOLA Kids vs New Bee Headset: Bluetooth Headphones
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.