I am a Historian of Early Modern Philosophy. My primary research focus is the thought of seventeenth century philosophers Thomas Hobbes and Margaret Cavendish, but my research broadly concerns issues related to materialism, perception, and philosophy of mind in that period.
My CV is available here (last updated online January 2025).
As of Fall 2025, I am working on the following: 1) an edition of Margaret Cavendish's Philosophical and Physical Opinions (in contract with Hackett); and 2) a chapter on Hobbes's Dialogus physicus.
My monograph Hobbes’s Two Sciences: Politics, Geometry, and the Structure of Philosophy is published with Oxford University Press (more information here). The book provides a new understanding of the unity of Thomas Hobbes’s philosophy by situating his politics within his account of scientific knowledge as constructed by humans—an epistemology founded on the idea that makers have special access to causal knowledge—and by demonstrating that the relationship between pure and mixed mathematics provided him with a model for thinking about relationships between geometry and natural philosophy and between politics and history. In short, the book articulates Hobbes's answer to a question that still matters today: Can politics be scientific?
My past work has examined themes such as the following: the laws of nature in Leviathan and their connection to geometrical definitions; Margaret Cavendish’s criticisms of Hobbes’s explanation of visual perception; the debate between Hobbes and Robert Boyle concerning experimentation and scientific knowledge; Hobbes’s objections to Descartes’s Meditations; and Hobbes’s view of the relationship between mathematics and natural philosophy.
I am the volume editor of A Companion to Hobbes in the Blackwell Companions to Philosophy series (2021). The entry I wrote for the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Hobbes’s Philosophy of Science discusses some of the areas of Hobbes’s thought on which my work has focused.
Motion as an Accident of Matter: Margaret Cavendish and Thomas Hobbes on Motion and Rest, Southern Journal of Philosophy 59.4 (2021): 495-522.
Hobbes’s Laws of Nature in Leviathan as a Synthetic Demonstration: Thought Experiments and Knowing the Causes, Philosophers’ Imprint 19.5 (2019): 1-23.
Natural Philosophy, Deduction, and Geometry in the Hobbes-Boyle Debate (Pre-print Version), Hobbes Studies 30 (2017): 83-107. Published Version.
Visual Perception as Patterning: Cavendish against Hobbes on Sensation (Pre-print Version), History of Philosophy Quarterly 33 (2016): 193-214. Published Version.
Hobbes on Natural Philosophy as ‘True Physics’ and Mixed Mathematics (Pre-print Version), Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 56 (2016): 43-51. Published Version.
Demarcating Aristotelian Rhetoric: Rhetoric, the Subalternate Sciences, and Boundary Crossing (Pre-print Version), Apeiron 48 (2015): 99-122. Published Version.
The Wax and the Mechanical Mind: Reexamining Hobbes’s Objections to Descartes’s Meditations (Pre-print Version), British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (2014): 403-424. Published Version.
PHILOSOPHY seems to me to be amongst humans now, in the same manner as corn and wine are said to have been in the world in ancient time. (Hobbes, De Corpore I.1)
I’m sympathetic to Hobbes’s claim above that, like the science of agriculture cultivates naturally-growing plants such as corn and grapes, the goal of philosophical activity is to cultivate common sense through reflection, often resulting in refinement.
To that end, some years ago I co-edited a collection of essays on whiskey, both thinking about whiskey and thinking about how whiskey enjoyment can impact our thinking. The result, Whiskey and Philosophy (published by Wiley-Blackwell in 2009 and still in print with Turner Publishing), was a collection of chapters on themes such as the history and culture of whiskey, the beauty and experience of whiskey, metaphysical, epistemological, and ethical aspects of whiskey production and consumption, and reflection on the places where whiskey is made and enjoyed. The book recently made it to audible.com.
The book includes reviews of different whiskeys and some cocktail recipes. If you’ve made it this far in this description: yes, the spelling is ‘whiskey’ and not ‘whisky’ (reasons detailed in the introduction to the book). This was perhaps the most fun I’ve ever had on an academic project!