Causes and Triggers

During Ferdinand Marcos' regime, the declaration of martial law in the Philippines in 1972 was primarily motivated by a complicated interplay of political ambitions, social unrest, and economic challenges. One of the primary causes was Marcos' desire to consolidate power and extend his presidency beyond the two-term limit imposed by the Philippine Constitution.

Faced with mounting opposition and criticism, Marcos used the pretext of growing civil unrest and communist insurgency to justify his authoritarian policies and suppress dissent. The Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) and its armed wing, the New People's Army (NPA), posed a significant threat to the government's authority, giving Marcos an easy justification for martial law.

Furthermore, the escalating threat of insurgency and armed conflict posed a significant challenge to the maintenance of law and order, prompting the government to adopt stringent measures in the form of martial law.

Martial law declarations empower the military to enforce law and order, protect critical infrastructure, and mitigate threats posed by internal or external adversaries, albeit often at the expense of civil liberties. Understanding the causes and triggers of martial law is essential for assessing its implications on democracy, governance, and individual rights within a society.

The events leading to the declaration of Martial Law unfolded on the evening of Friday, September 22, 1972, when Secretary of Defense Juan Ponce Enrile's convoy was reportedly ambushed in Wack-Wack as he headed home to Dasmariñas Village in Makati before 9 p.m. Enrile recounted that his convoy was leaving Camp Aguinaldo when another vehicle opened fire and quickly fled the scene.

The immediate trigger of the alleged ambush of Defense Secretary Juan Ponce Enrile, which Marcos used to justify declaring martial law in response to the alleged threat of rebellion. However, subsequent investigations and accounts revealed that the ambush was staged as a pretext for declaring martial law. In addition, Marcos used the threat of insurgency and communism to justify his authoritarian rule and suppress political opponents, including opposition members and civil society activists. The declaration of martial law enabled Marcos to consolidate power, silence dissent, and maintain his rule through authoritarian measures.

The Philippines faced Economic challenges, including persistent poverty and inequality, exacerbated social tensions and fostered an environment ripe for political upheaval. Vote buying, political terrorism, and ballot snatching were among the issues that the time of Marcos in the Philippines had to deal with while trying to bring back the greatness of the country.

The 1969 election was labeled as the "dirtiest, most violent, and most corrupt," which upset a lot of people. The MORO rebellion was excessive, the cost of infrastructure, and foreign debt were among the concerns that the government failed to handle. Jose Maria Sison created the CCP-NPA in response to these issues.

Rising inflation and unemployment became triggers for martial law due to the Philippines' economic struggles. The country's reliance on a failed strategy of import-substituting industrialization led to chronic trade deficits and balance of payments crises.

Despite attempts to address these issues through measures like devaluation and high tariffs, the economy continued to falter, with industries geared towards a small domestic market. Meanwhile, neighboring countries shifted to export-oriented industrialization, exacerbating the Philippines' economic woes. This economic instability fueled social unrest, ultimately contributing to the declaration of martial law.

Therefore, the cause and triggers of the implementation of Martial in the Philippines reflect a complex interplay of political, social and economic factors. From the erosion of democratic institutions to rising civil unrest, each element underscores the profound impact on the lives of ordinary Filipinos, reminding us the of the enduring importance of safeguarding democratic principles and upholding human rights to prevent such crises from happening again. Through understanding this tumultuous period, we honor the struggles and sacrifices of those who fought for freedom, inspiring us to remain vigilant in protecting our democratic values for future generations.

References:

Constantino, Renato. The Philippines: A Past Revisited. Quezon City: Renato Constantino Foundation, 1975.
De Dios, E. S., Gochoco-Bautista, M. S., & Punongbayan, J. C. (Year). Martial law and the
Philippine economy. University of the Philippines School of Economics.
Gross, Oren. "The Taming of Emergency Powers." Cambridge University Press, 2006
Human Rights Watch (HRW). "Philippines: Martial Law declaration triggers widespread fear." May 2017, p. 5.
Karnow, Stanley. In Our Image: America's Empire in the Philippines. New York: Random House, 1989.
McCoy, Alfred W. Closer than Brothers: Manhood at the Philippine Military Academy. New
Haven: Yale University Press, 1999.
Posner, Eric A., and Adrian Vermeule. "Emergency Powers and the Rule of Law After 9/11."
Oxford University Press, 2006.
Primitivo Mijares, The Conjugal Dictatorship of Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos I. (New York:
Union Square Publications, 1986), p. 166
Rappler. "The Road to Martial Law in the Philippines." September 2012.
Raul Rodrigo, Phoenix: The Saga of the Lopez Family Volume 1: 1800 – 1972, Manila: Eugenio
Lopez Foundation, Inc., 2007), p. 377

Contributions:

Research:

Galang
Hacov
Lazaraga
Macaraeg
Thong
Yap

Website was Made & Finalized by: Vilchez, Xirah Ashley (DDM1-A10)

Page updated

Google Sites

Report abuse