This paper examines whether voters respond to investments in primary healthcare and improvements in access to services. We study Rio de Janeiro, the major Brazilian city that experienced the fastest expansion of the Family Health Program (FHP) between 2009 and 2012. Exploiting fine-grained geocoded data on voting and facility catchment areas, we estimate how changes in FHP coverage at the polling-booth level, driven by the staggered roll-out of new catchment areas, affected the mayor's vote share in 2012. We find that voters do respond to the expansion of primary care: a one standard deviation increase in FHP coverage raises the incumbent's vote share by approximately 1 percentage point, or about 3.2% of the baseline mean, with effects reaching 3.3 percentage points under full coverage. But how services are delivered matters as much as coverage itself. The largest electoral returns come from expansions through higher-quality facilities and from technologically intensive and infectious-disease–related procedures, services that are immediate and perceived as higher quality. These patterns suggest that voters reward improvements in the quality and immediacy of care rather than the simple addition of new health facilities and teams.
FHP coverage in Rio de Janeiro: Family Clinics (CF) and traditional units (CMS) and their catchment areas, 2012
We examine whether female success in professional sports can shift beliefs about gender inequality and gender roles. Using quasi-random variation from the overlap between women’s international soccer tournaments and Latinobarómetro interviews, we estimate the impact of national team performance on gender attitudes. Individuals interviewed seven days after a women’s team victory are 63 percent more likely to report that men and women are not treated equally compared to those interviewed just before, while defeats make respondents 17 percent less likely to do so, draws have no effect. Event-study estimates indicate that the effect of victories emerges immediately and persists. The impact is stronger in high-salience competitions and is not driven by score margins. Victories also weaken traditional views about domestic roles and male political leadership, while defeats reinforce traditional attitudes toward intra-household economic hierarchies.
This paper investigates the socioeconomic impacts of hydropower plant (HPP) construction on local communities in Brazil, focusing on health outcomes, labor markets, demographic changes, and fertility. Using administrative data from 1997 to 2021 and combining matching methods with a staggered difference-in-differences framework, I examine 77 municipalities affected by 45 HPPs constructed between 2002 and 2017. HPP construction generates a significant increase in male employment, concentrated in short-duration spells among younger workers, alongside wage increases for both men and women and a short-lived boost in tax revenues and GDP growth, with no evidence of lasting structural transformation. On the health side, injury-related mortality rises by approximately 17.6%, driven almost entirely by male deaths, consistent with the occupational and social risks associated with large construction sites. Fertility increases among younger women, particularly those aged 15–19 (a 10.7% rise), and births within common-law relationships increase while births to unmarried mothers decline, reflecting shifts in family formation patterns likely driven by the improvement in men’s local labor market prospects. Taken together, these findings suggest that large infrastructure projects carry significant social costs alongside their economic benefits, and that these costs fall disproportionately on vulnerable groups.
Hydropower Plants’ Location, Affected Municipalities and Main Rivers
Provider Behavior and Reproductive Autonomy (with Jana Abou Hjaily)
The Socio-Political Impact of Pentecostal Growth in Brazil (with Bruno Komel and Akira Pinto Medeiros)
Exposure to Infectious Diseases During Pregnancy, Birth Outcomes and Infant Health (with Rudi Rocha, Thiago Tachibana, Luis Alvarez, and Sonia Bhalotra)
This paper estimates the impact of exposure to infectious diseases during pregnancy on health outcomes at birth. By linking administrative data on births, mortality and mandatory notification of infectious diseases, we are able to assess whether a mother residing in the municipality of Rio de Janeiro was exposed to dengue fever, syphilis or tuberculosis in the nine months prior to birth. Our main empirical strategy consists in estimating linear fixed effects models controlling for neighborhood-specific and city-level trends, as well as mother characteristics and socioeconomic variables in the region of residence. We further complement our analysis with the estimation of semi-parametric survival functions. Consistent with previous evidence in the medical literature, we find that exposure to Dengue fever during pregnancy leads to an increase in preterm birth. As for syphilis, we find that exposure during pregnancy leads to higher infant mortality and lower birth weight; it also increases the odds of fetal death. Exposure to tuberculosis leads to lower birth weight and a higher likelihood of preterm birth. We assess the heterogeneity of our estimates with respect to access to primary health care by exploiting the arguably exogenous expansion of Family Health Clinics (Clínicas da Família) in Rio over the years 2001-2016. We find that primary health care is able to mitigate some, though by no means all, adverse effects of exposure to infectious diseases during pregnancy. Interestingly, there appears to be a “postponement” effect in exposure to syphilis: access to primary health care decreases the effect of exposure on fetal death, though it increases the positive impact on infant mortality.
Predicting Dengue Outbreaks with Explainable Machine Learning (with Robson Aleixo, Fabio Kon, Rudi Rocha, and Raphael De Camargo) [paper]
Seasonal infectious diseases, such as dengue, have been causing great losses in many countries around the world in terms of deaths, quality of life, and economic burden. In Brazil, this is relevant not only in large cities such as Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo but, according to the Ministry of Health, in another 500 cities throughout the country. Predicting the occurrence of diseases, such as dengue bursts, can be a valuable instrument for public health management as health officials can better prepare and redirect resources to the affected areas. In this paper, we present an explainable machine learning model to forecast the number of dengue occurrences in a large metropolis, Rio de Janeiro. We focus on explainable models, which provide health authorities with the reasons for outbreak predictions, allowing them to plan their actions accordingly. We trained a gradient boosting decision tree algorithm (CatBoost) with data from the National System of Information on Notifiable Diseases (SINAN), weather data, and socio-demographic data from The Brazilian Institute of Geoaraphy and Statistics (IBGE).
Estimation of Resources Needed to Expand the Family Health Strategy (with Manuel Faria, Arthur Aguillar, and Renato Tasca) [report in Portuguese]
In 30 years, the Unified Health System (SUS, for Sistema Único de Saúde) has managed to significantly increase life expectancy at birth and reduce infant mortality, hospitalizations, as well as racial inequality in deaths and immunizations. This success is largely attributed to the Family Health Strategy (FHS), which has become one of the most successful to date. We estimate that a 100% coverage of the FHS can be achieved with approximately 25.6 thousand new teams, which would require up to 236.9 thousand healthcare professionals, including doctors, nurses, technicians, assistants, and community health agents, at a cost of R$ 22.9 billion per year.
Healthcare in the Legal Amazon (with Rudi Rocha, Lucas Falcão, Mariana Silveira and Gabriela Thomazinho)
Report 1 - Health in the Legal Amazon: Recent Evolution and Challenges in Comparative Perspective [report in Portuguese]
Report 2 - Health in the Legal Amazon: Qualitative Analysis of Challenges and Good Practices [report in Portuguese]
Report 3 - Health in the Legal Amazon: An Agenda for Action [report in Portuguese]
Applying the coalition’s presidentialism model to the city of São Paulo: predominance of the executive or greater sharing of power? (with Akira Pinto Medeiros and Marcello Baird), E-Legis, 2021, ISSN 2175-0688 [paper]
This article has the objective to study patterns of interaction between the Executive and the Legislative branches of government, in the City of São Paulo, between the promulgation of the City Council bylaw (1991) and the legislative period ended in 2016. We seek to observe if there are pattern differences’ between the municipal level and the Federal level through the usage of the coalition’s presidentialism model. We use data from all laws presented according to its presenter to work with the concepts of “dominance” and “success” at the municipal level. The main findings are described as: I -the percentage of laws presented and voted inside each legislature period is high; II -the majority of the laws presented came from the Legislative branch; III -The Executive branch has greater success in its propositions even though this power underperforms what is seen at the Federal Level; IV -The Municipal Executive branch tax of dominance is low in comparison to the dominance presented by the Federal Executive, suggesting a greater share of power between powers in the Municipal level.