The figures illustrate the comparison between models identified using classical SINDy with a discrete delay assumption and the proposed LCT-SINDy framework for distributed-delay systems. In the top-left panels, the true system (generated from a distributed-delay model) is compared with a model identified using SINDy under a discrete-delay assumption. As observed, the identified discrete-delay model exhibits noticeable mismatch with the true dynamics. This discrepancy arises because the underlying data are generated from a distributed-delay system, while the identification procedure assumes a single discrete delay, leading to structural model error. In contrast, the right panels demonstrate the performance of the proposed LCT-SINDy method, which incorporates the Linear Chain Trick to represent distributed delays. The identified model closely matches the true distributed-delay dynamics, significantly improving the agreement between simulation and data. The bottom-left figure presents the relative error of the reconstructed distributed-delay state under varying noise levels. The results show that the LCT-based approach maintains robust accuracy across increasing noise intensities, highlighting its stability and reliability in noisy data settings.
Alanazi, M., & Bani-Yaghoub, M. (2026).
Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Distributed-Delay Dynamics via the Linear Chain Trick. arXiv:2601.13536
View on arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13536