Experiments

To validate the proposed approach, we asked several selected users to design an emergency management scenario related to a given smart city. In particular, we focused on two cities of Lazio region in Italy: Rome and Latina.

They are representative, respectively, of European large and medium-sized cities. Then, we further restricted our experimentation by giving some guidelines to drive the design of the scenario model. To this purpose, we asked users to imagine some events impacting on one or two services in the city, a couple of situations where the exchange of information between users or services involved in the emergency scenario take place, and a final situation where an emergency service participates to the recovery.

The users were city planners selected from three major Italian organizations playing an official role in emergency management: ENEA, which is the Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development; ARPALazio, which is the Regional Agency for Environmental Protection of Lazio region; and Civil Protection of Rome. Most of the participants to the experimentation have more than 10 years experience in their field. The involved city planners of ENEA are researchers involved mainly in risk and impact analysis activities and in simulation research. They include the head and some members of the Laboratory for the Analysis and Protection of Critical Infrastructures, and some members of the task force for the ENEA activities related to the Central Italy earthquake of 2016 that caused many damages and casualties, in particular, in the city of Amatrice. The involved ARPALazio city planners are officials with duties related mainly to control and analysis activities on the field. They include also the director of ARPALazio headquarters of Rome and the head of Environmental Pressure Department.

Finally the involved city planners of Civil Protection have duties related to the whole emergency preparedness but focus mainly on interventions on the field.

GALLERY

Experiments: photo 1
Experiments: photo 2
Experiments: photo 3
Experiments: photo 4
Experiments: photo 5
Experiments: photo 6
Experiments: photo 7
Experiments: photo 8
Experiments: photo 9
Experiments: photo 10
Experiments: photo 11
Experiments: photo 12
Experiments: photo 13
Experiments: photo 14
Experiments: photo 15
Experiments: photo 16
Experiments: photo 17
Experiments: photo 18
Experiments: photo 19
Experiments: photo 20
Experiments: photo 21
Experiments: photo 22
Experiments: photo 23
Experiments: photo 24
Experiments: photo 25
Experiments: photo 26
Experiments: photo 27
Experiments: photo 28
Experiments: photo 29
Experiments: photo 30
Experiments: photo 31
Experiments: photo 32
Experiments: photo 33
Experiments: photo 34
Experiments: photo 35
Experiments: photo 36
Experiments: photo 37
Experiments: photo 38
Experiments: photo 39
Experiments: photo 40
Experiments: photo 41
Experiments: photo 42
Experiments: photo 43
Experiments: photo 44
Experiments: photo 45
Experiments: photo 46
Experiments: photo 47
Experiments: photo 48
Experiments: photo 49
Experiments: photo 50
Experiments: photo 51
Experiments: photo 52
Experiments: photo 53
Experiments: photo 54
Experiments: photo 55
Experiments: photo 56
Experiments: photo 57