Logitech G321 vs Logitech G325 at a Glance
• Logitech G321: Its 16 kHz flip-to-mute boom mic and 210 g weight suit focused calls and long sessions; the trade-off is a shorter stated battery life of 20+ hours.
• Logitech G325: Its built-in mic with AI-powered noise reduction, 24-bit customizable audio, and 24+ hour battery life offer more flexibility; its microphone is integrated rather than a boom you can flip up.
• Choose G321 if you want a visible, physical boom mic with quick mute control and a headset focused on comfortable wireless gaming.
• Choose G325 if you want noise-reduced mic pickup, app-based audio customization, and use across compatible PC, PlayStation, Switch, and mobile setups.
• Both offer LIGHTSPEED wireless and Bluetooth, so the choice is less about wireless versus wired and more about microphone design, battery life, and audio controls.
The Logitech G321 makes sense if you prefer a boom mic you can flip to mute. That gives the mic a clear, physical mute action rather than relying only on an integrated microphone and button controls. For remote meetings, that straightforward control can be useful when you need to silence yourself quickly. Its microphone is specified as 16 kHz, and the headset also has power, Bluetooth, and volume buttons.
Comfort is a central part of its design. At 210 g, it is slightly lighter than the G325, with a padded headband, knit fabric, and memory foam ear cups. The G321 connects through LIGHTSPEED wireless or Bluetooth, and its stated battery life is 20+ hours. Those details make it a reasonable fit for someone moving between PC gaming, calls, music, and a phone.
I’d choose the G321 if a boom mic and simple physical mute are priorities, or if the lighter listed weight appeals to you. I’d skip it if you specifically want built-in background-noise reduction or the longer stated battery life of the G325. The G321’s stated features do not include the G325’s AI-powered mic noise reduction or customizable 24-bit audio.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-09 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
Its other clear advantage is battery life: the stated figure is 24+ hours, compared with 20+ hours for the G321. The G325 weighs 212 g and uses dual-layer memory foam ear cups and a soft knit headband. It also offers 24-bit customizable audio, with presets and further adjustment through Logitech G HUB or the mobile app. That combination is useful if you want to tune how games, music, and other audio sound rather than stick with a fixed presentation.
The trade-off is that its mic is built in, not a flip-to-mute boom. If you strongly prefer a mic you can physically move away from your face, the G321 is the more natural fit. But if you take calls around ordinary household or desk noise and want the headset to help reduce that background sound, the G325’s microphone feature is the more relevant one.
• Best for a flip-to-mute boom mic → Logitech G321. Its boom mic is the clearest distinction if you want a physical mic and a direct mute gesture.
• Best for background-noise reduction in calls → Logitech G325. Its built-in beamforming mic uses AI-powered noise reduction aimed at sounds such as keyboard clicks and fan hums.
• Best for stated battery life → Logitech G325. It is rated for 24+ hours, while the G321 is listed at 20+ hours.
• Best for the lower listed weight → Logitech G321. It weighs 210 g; the G325 weighs 212 g. The difference is small, but the G321 is the lighter of the two by specification.
• Best for customizable 24-bit audio → Logitech G325. It supports audio presets and customization through G HUB or the mobile app.
• Best for broad listed console compatibility → Logitech G325. Its stated compatibility covers PC, PS4, PS5, Switch 1 and 2, and mobile devices.
• Best for simple mic-position control during remote work → Logitech G321. Flip-to-mute is easy to understand and makes muting a physical action.
• Best for a “one headset for several devices” setup → Logitech G325. LIGHTSPEED and Bluetooth give it flexible wireless connections, with a wider set of listed gaming platforms.
The G321 and G325 share the core idea: lightweight over-ear headsets with wireless connections for gaming and everyday use. Both list Bluetooth and LIGHTSPEED, and both use memory foam in their ear cups. Their meaningful differences show up when you consider how you communicate and how much you value longer battery life or audio adjustment.
For remote work, the microphone question is the one I’d settle first. If you prefer a boom that flips to mute, the G321 is more direct. If your desk has a keyboard or fan nearby and you want mic noise reduction built in, the G325 is the more compelling option on paper. That does not mean the G325 eliminates every background sound; the stated feature is intended to minimize certain noise, not guarantee a silent call.
Battery life also favors the G325 by its listed figures, though both claim more than 20 hours. The difference may matter if you use the headset through work and into an evening gaming session without wanting to recharge as often. The G321 is still specified for 20+ hours, so it is not a short-session-only headset.
Comfort is close rather than decisive. The G321 weighs 210 g and has a thick padded headband, knit fabric, and memory foam ear cups. The G325 weighs 212 g, with a soft knit headband and dual-layer memory foam ear cups. Those descriptions suggest different approaches to padding, but they do not establish that one will fit every head better. Fit is personal, so I would not choose solely on a two-gram difference.
The G325 has a stronger case if you want to adjust audio for different uses. Its 24-bit audio can be customized with presets or through G HUB and the mobile app. The G321 emphasizes high-performance drivers and immersive game sound, but the provided features do not list the same customization options. If you want an uncomplicated gaming headset and physical mic control, that may be enough; if you like to shape the sound, the G325 offers more tools.
A final practical detail: the G325 names PC, PlayStation, Switch, and mobile compatibility, while the G321’s product information emphasizes PC gaming alongside Bluetooth use for devices such as phones. Both have two wireless connection types, but the G325 is the clearer choice if you are buying with several console platforms in mind.
I’d choose the Logitech G325 for remote work because its built-in noise-reduction mic, longer stated battery life, and customizable audio make it the more versatile everyday headset. Its broad listed compatibility adds to that case if you move between a PC and consoles.
I’d still pick the G321 if a flip-to-mute boom mic is non-negotiable. For most people weighing these two, though, I think the G325’s mix of call-focused mic features and longer battery life is the stronger fit.
The G325 has a built-in beamforming mic with AI-powered noise reduction, designed to reduce sounds such as keyboard clicks and fan hums. Choose the G321 instead if you want its 16 kHz flip-to-mute boom mic and physical mic positioning.
The G325 is listed for 24+ hours of battery life. The G321 is listed for 20+ hours, so the G325 has the longer stated runtime.
No. Its microphone is built into the headset. The G321 has a boom mic that flips to mute, making it the better fit if you specifically want a movable, physical mic.
The G325 is the one with 24-bit customizable audio, presets, and adjustment through G HUB or the mobile app. The G321’s listed features focus on immersive sound and straightforward headset controls rather than those customization options.
• NANAMI Earbuds vs ASKUBSKU Earbuds 3.5mm: Wired Headphones
• Otium Earbuds vs SGNICS Earbuds: Ipx6 Waterproof Headphones
• SOAR NFL Active Noise vs FOYCOY Kids Open Ear
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.