Gemini Advanced Scoring System (GAS System)

NOTE: This prompt is designed to help those hesitant to embrace AI, particularly in academic settings. Developed during the creation of the initial Lewis Acid Table, its primary aim is to demonstrate the power and utility of AI language models to professors and instructors. While students readily adopt AI-powered tools, many educators remain reluctant, even though they stand to benefit the most. Imagine streamlining the assessment and grading of hundreds of students, a task that can feel like a nightmare with current resources. This system offers a glimpse into the potential of AI, allowing you to gather preliminary data and evaluate a project's scope quickly. It serves as a practical introduction to the capabilities of these models, encouraging educators to explore and integrate them into their workflows. While the data produced by the GAS System Prompt is valuable for initial project scoping and exploration, it is not a substitute for peer-reviewed research and should not be used as such. This prompt is designed to jumpstart your research process or give it some GAS, not replace rigorous academic inquiry. 

The fully referenced dataset at lewisacidtable.org remains a primary resource for comprehensive and validated information. Its scoring system is based on reactivity with fluorocarbons. This GAS System Prompt, refined through numerous iterations to ensure simplicity and ease of use, can reproduce a condensed version of the Lewis Acid Table with remarkable accuracy in under 10 minutes. This makes it an ideal starting point for any project requiring quick access to key information. Enjoy. 

User Prompt for Initiating GAS 

Instructions: Copy and Paste the following, as is, into Gemini Advanced or an equivalent AI-Language Model, answer the questions to the best of your ability, and go from there. Request the table to be displayed at any time after the first few questions.

Hey Gemini, I'm working on a project and need your help to evaluate different options. I'd like to try using your Gemini Advanced Scoring (GAS) system. Can you create a data table with a comprehensive scoring scale to help me compare these options?

Here's what I know about how the GAS system should work:

• Scoring Range: 0.001 (worst) to 1.999 (best). I'm looking for a detailed scoring system that can make fine distinctions between options.

• No Ties: No two options can end up with the same score.

• Central Point: You'll need to figure out a central point that makes sense for my project. Maybe 1.000, or higher if that's more appropriate.

• Flexible Weights: I want to be able to adjust the importance of different criteria, so please suggest some initial weights, but let me change them if needed.

• Table Format: I'm picturing a table where:

  • Each row is one of the options I'm comparing.

  • Each column is a different factor that matters in my decision.

Here's the information you'll need to get started:

1. Project Goal: [I'll provide a brief description of what I'm trying to achieve.]

2. Options: [I'll give you a list of the things I'm trying to choose between.]

3. More Options?: If you know of other options that I might have missed, please suggest them!

4. Specific Objectives: [I'll explain the most important things I'm hoping for.]

5. Limitations: [I'll let you know about any restrictions or constraints.]

6. Personal Preferences: [I'll tell you how much my own opinions should factor in, and any specific things that matter to me.]

7. Possible Columns: [I'll suggest some columns for the table, and what kind of information should go in each.]

After I give you that information, can you do the following?

1. Design the GAS System:

   • Choose a central point.

   • Decide on the scoring system and starting weights for each column.

   • Explain why you chose that central point and those weights.

2. Apply the GAS System:

   • Make the table with the options listed.

   • Give each option a score in each column, and explain how you decided on those scores.

   • Calculate a final, weighted GAS score for each option.

   • Let me adjust the scores or weights if I think they need to be changed.

3. Explain the Scoring:

Once the table is finished, write a short paragraph explaining how you used the GAS system for my specific project. Include details about the central point, how you weighted the different criteria, and anything else that affected the scores. This paragraph will go with the table so I can understand how you scored everything.