Lesti Carmelo - Final Draft

Preserving Academic Integrity in the Age of AI

Executive Summary

Artificial Intelligence tools like ChatGPT and Copilot have become incredibly widespread in academic settings; students are increasingly using these tools to access instant support for their academic work. The ethical concern is that these tools offer new ways of learning, but they also raise growing concerns about academic integrity. Students are starting to rely on AI to complete their coursework without putting much effort into the actual assignment, which raises questions about long-term learning, institutional credibility, and career readiness. This report outlines the gravity of the issue, examines its consequences, and offers recommendations to promote responsible use of AI in higher education. It also considers institutional and employer perspectives, providing both qualitative and quantitative evidence of the growing urgency to address this issue.

Scope of the Issue

In several cases, students used these AI tools to write essays and solve difficult problems, without much actual input from the users themselves. Some people might see this as a trend, but evidence suggests this behavior is increasingly becoming the norm in classrooms. University staff have reported noticeable shifts in their students’ submissions, oddly perfect grammar, robotic sentence structures, and lack of personal voice. These changes are noticed most when students are presented with activities that require engagement, such as oral presentations and class discussions. There are even students who normally struggled with their coursework, and are now turning in assignments that are near perfect, raising questions and flags for instructors.

Also, lots of existing plagiarism detection systems are not trained to detect content generated by AI. This allows academic dishonesty to occur undetected, adding pressure on faculty and institutions to find more consistent solutions. A lack of awareness around how generative AI works, especially with more advanced models adds another layer of complexity for both students and faculty.

In a study conducted by the International Center for Academic Integrity, over 60% of surveyed faculty members admitted they were unsure (International Center for Academic Integrity, 2023) how to differentiate between authentic student work and AI-assisted responses. This uncertainty underscores the pressing need for clearer guidelines and institutional support.

Consequences of AI Misuse

The temptation to use AI tools to bypass effort is understandable. Students today are balancing academics with part-time jobs, internships, and personal responsibilities. For many, AI offers an easy solution to meet deadlines. However, reliance on these tools as shortcuts leads to long-term academic and personal consequences.

Students are missing out on critical learning opportunities by using AI to do most of their work. Writing essays, solving problems, and conducting research are also essential skills that need to be practiced to improve their analytical and critical thinking. When AI does all the work on these assignments, students risk losing the skills they need to progress through their courses and careers. There are also growing concerns among employers. A recent survey conducted by Intelligent.com reported that over 40% of hiring managers question the credibility of academic qualifications due to AI misuse (Intelligent, 2024). In fields like journalism, coding, marketing, and data analysis, the ability to problem-solve and think independently is much more valuable than a GPA.

This abuse of AI is leading to distrust to and a loss of credibility for institutions. Students graduating and earning degrees with these tools are allowing alumni to struggle in the workplace, and this is risking reputational damage to the universities that certified them. This is even more damaging to smaller colleges or community college working to improve their academic reputations.

There is also the potential for students to be psychologically affected. It isn’t uncommon for someone to feel impostor syndrome before AI came about, but now with students habitually relying on them, this issue could get even worse. In the long run, this could lead to lower confidence in their skills and performance in places where AI can’t help them.

Institutional Challenges

Many academic institutions are not fully equipped to deal with the rapid rise of generative AI. Current academic integrity policies were written before ChatGPT, Claude, and similar tools that have become common among students. This has created a significant gap between enforcement capabilities and the reality of AI's integration into education.

Professors are often left to interpret vague guidelines or create their own rules for the classroom. Some ban the use of AI entirely, while others permit it for tasks like brainstorming or citation generation. This inconsistency leads to student confusion—and in some cases, exploitation of policy gaps.

A few of the main ethical questions that make the situation even more complicated include:

● Is using AI to write an essay plagiarism if the ideas are original?

● Is it fair that one student uses AI to pass while another works independently?

● Should universities penalize all AI use or teach responsible usage instead?

Students being this unprepared leaves professors with no clear guidelines on how to uphold their ethical use while enforcing integrity. Institutions should update their policies not just to punish people who use AI, but also to guide users on how to use it ethically in this new age of artificial intelligence. Receiving input from both faculty and students while setting rules and guidelines is essential in creating stronger policies regarding the use of artificial intelligence.

Proposal

To effectively address the academic challenges posed by AI misuse, this report proposes a comprehensive set of recommendations that institutions can implement today to regulate and guide ethical AI use in education.

First, institutions need to clearly define what is acceptable and unacceptable use of AI in their academic integrity policies. These guidelines should be updated regularly and communicated to students through handbooks, syllabi, and acknowledgment forms (EDUCAUSE, 2024). Faculty should also receive training on how to identify and handle suspected cases of AI misuse fairly and consistently (International Center for Academic Integrity, 2023).

Second, AI literacy should be embedded into the curriculum through required workshops and course modules that focus on responsible technology use. These efforts will help students understand both the capabilities and limitations of generative AI, as well as the ethical considerations that come with its use (University of Michigan, 2024). Assignments can incorporate AI-assisted brainstorming or outlining with clear rules on when and how disclosure is required.

Third, instructors should redesign assessments to discourage dependency on AI. Examples include in-class writing assignments, oral presentations, peer-reviewed collaborative projects, and long-term assignments that build upon previous work. Adding reflection components where students explain their learning process can also reinforce accountability.

Fourth, the use of AI-detection tools, such as Turnitin’s AI indicator, should be supported by clear institutional policies that prioritize transparency (EDUCAUSE, 2024). Students should be made aware of how these tools are used and provided with a fair process for appealing false positives (International Center for Academic Integrity, 2023).

Finally, institutions can foster an ethical campus culture by hosting forums on AI in education, inviting expert speakers, and encouraging student-led discussions. Schools can also draw from successful models like:

● University of Michigan: Generative Aritificial Intelligence Committee Report (University of Michigan, 2024)

● San Diego CCD: AI-powered tutoring pilots (San Diego CCD, 2023)

● Arizona State University: Student AI usage logs as part of submission protocol (EDUCAUSE, 2024)

By implementing these strategies, colleges and universities can support innovation while preserving academic standards, ensuring students are equipped with both technical and ethical competencies for life beyond graduation.

Conclusion

Artificial intelligence is transforming how students engage with their education. While it provides valuable tools for learning, it also opens the door to misuse, dishonesty, and academic shortcuts. Institutions must rise to meet this challenge—not through blanket bans, but through clear policies, ethical education, and the redesign of assessments.

Higher education stands at a crossroads. Learning how to use AI tools responsibly could enhance how students learn and better prepare them for the new age of artificial intelligence. But if this issue were to worsen, educational institutions would continue to lose value and stress students to reach even greater heights of education to keep up with the times. What matters is how we balance its use, allow it to act as a supplement for your work rather than letting it craft everything for its users. If Universities act fast in integrating new policies, they can preserve their reputations along with the value of their degrees. All while equipping students for success after school in this rapidly evolving digital age. The steps taken today will determine whether AI becomes a crutch or a catalyst for intellectual growth.

References

Pew Research Center. (2023). AI and Higher Education Survey Report. https://www.pewresearch.org

8 in 10 companies plan to Layoff Recent College Grads this year due to ai. Intelligent. (2024, May 28). https://www.intelligent.com/8-in-10-companies-plan-to-layoff-recent-college-grads-this-year-due-to-ai/

University of Michigan. (2024). https://genai.umich.edu/committee-report

San Diego CCD. (2023). AI Integration in Hybrid Classrooms. https://www.sdccd.edu

EDUCAUSE. (2024). AI Policy Benchmarking Report. https://www.educause.edu