Early Departure from Medicine: What Counts as Leaving?

Introduction

The phrase "doctors are leaving the profession earlier" can refer to several phenomena. It may mean early retirement among older physicians, premature exit from clinical practice among early-career physicians, reduced clinical hours, transition to nonclinical work, organizational turnover, emigration, locum tenens work, entrepreneurial or industry roles, or remaining in medicine with a narrowed scope. The literature increasingly uses intention to leave (ITL), intention to reduce work hours (ITR), actual turnover, and workforce participation as measurable proxies, but none captures the full experience.

Retirement literature shows that physicians have traditionally retired later than many other professionals, but retirement timing is influenced by health, finances, workload, autonomy, burnout, call burden, and meaning (Silver, Hamilton, Biswas, & Warrick, 2016). Physicians may also "retire in place" by reducing call, limiting panels, dropping obstetrics or hospital work, refusing leadership roles, or moving to concierge, administrative, telemedicine, or consulting roles. These decisions may be rational and healthy, but when driven by avoidable system strain, they represent preventable loss of clinical capacity.

The strongest recent evidence links burnout and professional fulfillment to intention to leave and actual turnover. In a national survey of 37,112 physicians from 160 organizations, Rotenstein and colleagues found that from 2022 to 2024, more than one-fifth intended to reduce clinical hours and nearly one-sixth intended to leave their organization, even as rates declined over the period (Rotenstein et al., 2026). Factors most often named as reasons that could change physicians' minds included workload, schedule flexibility, staffing and resources, technology, compensation, and value alignment (Rotenstein et al., 2026). Among academic physicians, Ligibel and colleagues found that approximately one-third reported a moderate or greater intention to leave within 2 years, with burnout and a lack of professional fulfillment associated with that intention (Ligibel et al., 2023). In institutional data, Hamidi and colleagues showed that burnout predicted actual physician departure and generated substantial recruitment costs (Hamidi et al., 2018). More recently, a linked survey and Medicare claims data among family physicians found that burnout was associated with subsequent turnover or change in practice status, moving the evidence beyond intention into observed behavior (Khullar et al., 2026).

The literature on early clinical departure is especially important because it highlights physicians who complete training but do not remain in direct patient care. A recent national survey of clinically inactive physicians who completed residency between 2000 and 2022 found that "hassle factor" and stress were among the most commonly cited reasons for early clinical departure, while women were more likely than men to cite children or family caregiving (Chen, Carlasare, Brown, & Tutty, 2026). The term "hassle factor" is deceptively mild. In practice, it condenses many frustrations: insurance friction, documentation, billing, coding, regulatory compliance, metric fatigue, inbox work, inadequate staffing, schedule inflexibility, and repeated administrative obstacles.

Economic analyses show that departure is costly. Han and colleagues estimated that physician burnout costs the U.S. health care system billions annually through turnover and reduced clinical hours (Han et al., 2019). Sinsky and colleagues estimated that primary care physician turnover results in large excess health care expenditures, with a substantial share attributable to burnout-related turnover (Sinsky, Shanafelt, Dyrbye, et al., 2022). These estimates are conservative because they do not fully capture loss of continuity, decreased mentorship, delayed appointments, reduced patient trust, or the hidden cost of clinicians who stay but disengage.

An early departure must also be interpreted in light of workforce projections. The AAMC projects substantial physician shortages by 2036, as population aging increases demand and a large proportion of the physician workforce is already aged 55 or older (AAMC, 2024). Shortage projections should not be used to pressure individual physicians into self-sacrifice. Instead, they show the public consequences of failing to make clinical work sustainable. Every avoidable departure shifts the burden to those who remain, increasing their risk of burnout and creating a feedback loop.

Why Physicians Leave Earlier: A Cumulative-Causation Model

The literature does not support a single-cause explanation. Physicians leave earlier when several forces converge: chronic overload, reduced control, administrative burden, moral distress, loss of professional meaning, poor leadership, inequity, caregiving strain, financial or payment pressure, and attractive alternatives. The decision to leave is often delayed until a triggering event makes accumulated strain visible: a denied authorization, a hostile patient encounter, an unsafe staffing decision, a missed family event, a disciplinary response to speaking up, a health scare, a colleague's departure, a lawsuit, or simply another evening of documentation after the household has gone to sleep.

A useful model has three layers. The first is demand: clinical volume, acuity, complexity, hours, call, inbox load, documentation, and emotional labor. The second is control: autonomy, schedule flexibility, staffing, resources, EHR usability, payer friction, and authority to solve problems. The third is meaning: professional identity, ethical coherence, leadership trust, recognition, belonging, and values alignment. Burnout becomes most dangerous when demand is high, control is low, and meaning is compromised. Departure becomes more likely when alternatives appear more compatible with identity, health, family, and dignity.

Workload and Work Compression

Physicians have always worked hard. The distinguishing feature of contemporary burnout is not workload alone but work compression: more tasks, decisions, documentation requirements, messages, metrics, and coordination responsibilities squeezed into less recoverable time. Work compression erodes the buffer that previously allowed physicians to think, teach, comfort, call a consultant, review uncertainty, or breathe between encounters.

Long hours remain relevant. Higher weekly work hours are associated with burnout, moral distress, and work-life conflict (Shanafelt et al., 2015; Tutty et al., 2026; West et al., 2018). Yet the burden is not just duration. A 10-hour day of meaningful, coherent clinical work may be tiring but tolerable. An 8-hour clinic followed by 3 hours of documentation, prior authorization, test result management, patient portal messages, and quality metric reconciliation can feel more corrosive because the physician is still responsible but no longer engaged in the work that originally gave the role meaning.

Work compression also changes the physician-patient relationship. The physician may be physically present but cognitively divided among the patient, EHR prompts, documentation templates, coding requirements, health maintenance alerts, pharmacy rules, referral constraints, and inbox obligations. Patients experience rushed care; physicians experience moral failure. The problem is not that physicians do not value relationships. It is that relationship that has been pitted against systems of documentation and accountability that often claim to support care while consuming the attention care requires.

The literature on work-life integration reveals why workload becomes a retention issue. Physicians can sustain demanding work when it is finite, meaningful, and compatible with identity. They are less likely to tolerate work that invades every margin of life. After-hours EHR work, charting at home, weekend inbox catch-up, and vacation message management communicate that the physician is never fully off duty. This boundary erosion is especially consequential for younger physicians, women physicians, parents, caregivers, and those unwilling to accept the older professional bargain that a physician's family and body should absorb the overflow of a poorly designed system.

Electronic Health Records, Inbox Work, and Digital Medicine

The electronic health record is both an essential infrastructure and a major source of burnout. EHRs improve access to information, medication reconciliation, order entry, decision support, data exchange, and population management. Yet they also transformed physicians into data-entry workers, coders, inbox managers, compliance actors, and documentation producers for multiple audiences beyond the patient and clinician.

Time-and-motion and EHR log studies are among the most influential sources in the burnout literature. Sinsky and colleagues found that ambulatory physicians spent substantially more time on EHR and desk work than on direct face-to-face clinical time, with additional hours spent after work (Sinsky et al., 2016). Arndt and colleagues' "tethered to the EHR" study similarly demonstrated substantial EHR workload in primary care (Arndt et al., 2017). Tai-Seale and colleagues showed that physicians split time between patient encounters and desktop medicine, underscoring that modern clinical care continues long after the visit ends (Tai-Seale et al., 2017). Rotenstein and colleagues later identified system-level factors associated with primary care EHR time, showing that EHR burden is not simply a matter of individual inefficiency (Rotenstein, Holmgren, Downing, & Bates, 2023).

The inbox has become one of the clearest symbols of boundaryless medicine. Patient portals are valuable: they expand access, improve communication, and may prevent visits. But the volume of patient messages, refill requests, test result questions, forms, portal advice requests, and automated notifications has often grown without adequate staffing, payment, triage, or protected time. Garcia and colleagues reported that generative AI draft replies in a pilot study were associated with reductions in task load and work exhaustion, but not time savings, illustrating both the promise and limits of technological solutions (Garcia et al., 2024). Mandal and colleagues found that patient medical advice request messages were associated with physician work outside of work, particularly in digital health contexts (Mandal et al., 2024).

EHR burden is not evenly distributed. Studies have found associations among EHR usability, satisfaction, team structure, and burnout, suggesting that teamwork and system design can either reduce or intensify the digital burden (Holmgren et al., 2024; Rotenstein, Hendrix, Phillips, & Adler-Milstein, 2024). Gender differences in patient messaging and relational expectations may also contribute to differential workload, although mechanisms vary by specialty and organization (Lyubarova et al., 2023).

New technologies, including ambient documentation and AI-drafted messages, may help if they reduce low-value work rather than create new surveillance, editing, billing, or liability burdens. A 2025 JAMA Network Open study of ambient documentation technology among clinicians at two academic health systems found improved documentation-related well-being and reductions in burnout measures, but the study's low response rate and observational design warrant caution (You et al., 2025). The lesson is not "AI will fix burnout." The lesson is that technologies are well-being interventions only when they measurably return time, attention, and agency to clinical work.

Prior Authorization, Payer Friction, and Administrative Abrasion Prior authorization is one of the most frequently cited examples of responsibility without authority. It is defended on the grounds of utilization management, cost control, and evidence-based oversight. In some contexts, review may prevent waste or harm. The burnout problem arises when authorization processes are opaque, duplicative, slow, clinically misaligned, or require physicians to translate judgment into payer-specific language while patients wait repeatedly.

The practical burden is well described in surveys and health policy literature. Physicians report that prior authorization delays care, increases administrative workload, consumes staff and physicians' time, contributes to treatment abandonment, and frustrates patients and clinicians (AMA, 2025b; Sahni, Istvan, Stafford, & Cutler, 2024). The problem is not merely the number of forms. It is the moral structure of the interaction: the physician remains responsible to the patient, yet a distant process can delay or deny the plan without sharing the relational consequences.

Administrative abrasion is cumulative. A single form, denial, documentation query, or peer-to-peer call may be manageable. Repetition changes the professional self. Physicians learn which words unlock approval, which therapies are not worth attempting, which appeals will consume the evening, and which compromises can be presented as the plan. Over time, the system may need to deny less because clinicians pre-adapt. This is a key mechanism of early departure. Leaving may occur only after years of internal narrowing.

Prior authorization also strains the physician-patient relationship. Patients often experience delays due to failures of the clinician or the office. Physicians and staff absorb anger for decisions they did not make. When approvals depend on non-transparent criteria, the physician's judgment appears provisional. A system can say that the doctor is the accountable professional while operationally treating the doctor as a request submitter. That contradiction is a source of moral distress and identity injury.

Policy solutions include gold-carding for high-approval clinicians, standardized electronic prior authorization, real-time benefit tools, transparent criteria, fewer requirements for low-risk evidence-based care, time limits on payer decisions, reporting of denial and appeal reversal rates, and accountability when denial causes delay or harm. However, automation alone may make a bad process faster. Reform should ask not only whether prior authorization can be streamlined, but whether the requirement is clinically justified in the first place.

Responsibility Without Authority: Autonomy, Agency, and Control

Autonomy is one of the most robust constructs in burnout research. Physicians do not require unchecked authority, and modern medicine rightly includes team-based care, evidence-based guidelines, quality measurement, resource stewardship, and oversight. The problem is not accountability itself. The problem is accountability separated from meaningful control.

Physicians are often responsible for outcomes shaped by staffing, scheduling templates, formulary rules, coverage policies, discharge targets, inpatient capacity, referral availability, social determinants, and technology design. When something fails, the physician explains the delay, apologizes, responds to the portal message, signs the note, and bears the emotional cost. If authority over the upstream condition is absent, repeated accountability becomes demoralizing.

Loss of control is central to the decision to leave. A physician who can change workflows, adjust schedules, influence staffing, participate in governance, and trust leadership may tolerate stress. A physician who cannot change obvious sources of waste or harm may eventually protect themselves by reducing hours or exiting. Rotenstein et al. (2026) found that workload, schedule flexibility, staffing, resources, technology, compensation, and values alignment were common reasons physicians cited for reconsidering whether to leave or reduce their hours. These are not luxury requests. They are the operational conditions under which responsibility becomes bearable.

Autonomy should not be romanticized. Solo practice autonomy often came with financial risk, isolation, and a lack of support. Employment can bring benefits, teams, infrastructure, and predictable compensation. Yet the shift from physician-owned practice to hospital-, corporate-, or investor-influenced employment has altered the felt locus of control (AMA, 2026b; Tewfik et al., 2024). Physicians may become employees in systems where decisions about productivity, branding, payer contracting, staffing, and technology are made far from the clinical encounter. If professional voice is not structurally protected, employment can feel like subordination rather than support.

Staffing, Teams, and Operational Reliability

Burnout is often misdescribed as a physician-only problem. In reality, a physician's well-being depends on nurses, medical assistants, scribes, pharmacists, social workers, therapists, schedulers, interpreters, care managers, referral coordinators, and administrative staff. When teams are understaffed or unstable, physicians end up taking on tasks that should be distributed among them. They become the default safety net for every unowned process.

Staffing shortages produce moral distress because they turn ideals into promises the system cannot keep. A hospital may advertise patient-centered care while nurses cover unsafe ratios, social work is unavailable, psychiatric beds are scarce, and discharge options are fragile. A clinic may promise access while phones go unanswered, refills pile up, forms are delayed, and patient messages wait. Physicians then feel personally implicated in systemic unreliability.

Team efficiency can be protective. Team-based documentation, pre-visit planning, standing orders, medication refill protocols, in-basket triage, pharmacist support, integrated behavioral health, and care management can reduce physician burden while improving care (Bodenheimer & Sinsky, 2014; Rotenstein et al., 2024). However, team-based care requires investment. It cannot mean delegating physician work to already-burdened staff without training, authority, compensation, or workflow redesign.

Operational reliability is a moral issue. A reliable system allows clinicians to trust that referrals are completed, labs are followed, messages are triaged, high-risk results are escalated, and patients do not fall through gaps. An unreliable system forces physicians to compensate with personal vigilance. Personal vigilance is finite. When physicians leave early, they often do so not only because of workload but also because they no longer trust the system enough to sleep.

Moral Distress and Moral Injury Moral distress was originally developed in nursing ethics to describe situations in which clinicians know the ethically appropriate action but are constrained from acting (Jameton, 1984). Epstein and Hamric later described moral residue and the crescendo effect, in which repeated unresolved moral distress accumulates over time (Epstein & Hamric, 2009). Moral injury, developed in military and trauma literature, describes deeper injury to moral agency, trust, and self-understanding when one perpetrates, witnesses, fails to prevent, or is betrayed by acts that violate core moral commitments (Litz et al., 2009; Shay, 1994).

In health care, the language of moral injury gained traction because many clinicians felt that "burnout" made structural betrayal sound like individual weakness. Dean and colleagues argued that clinicians are often distressed because they know what patients need but are prevented from providing it by system constraints (Dean et al., 2019). Subsequent work has sought to define moral injury more precisely, distinguish it from burnout, and acknowledge overlap (Dean, Morris, Manzur, & Talbot, 2024; Mantri et al., 2020).

The 2026 national study of moral distress among U.S. physicians provides strong contemporary evidence. Tutty and colleagues found that moral distress was common, more prevalent among physicians than among other U.S. workers, and associated with burnout, intention to leave, and intention to reduce hours (Tutty et al., 2026). Emergency medicine and general internal medicine physicians were more likely to report high moral distress than some comparator groups, and women physicians had higher odds of reporting high moral distress than men (Tutty et al., 2026). The study matters because it empirically supports what many physicians have described: ethical constraint is not peripheral to burnout. It is one of its engines.

Moral distress can arise from end-of-life care, futile treatment, inadequate resources, poor communication, unsafe staffing, inability to secure appropriate placement, insurance barriers, legal restrictions, institutional policies, and conflicts between patient needs and financial rules (Tutty et al., 2026). It also arises when physicians are asked to participate in what they regard as dishonest communication: telling patients that a delay is simply a process issue when the process is known to be harmful; presenting a second-best plan as though it were equivalent; or documenting compliance with a care standard that staffing makes impossible.

Moral injury should be used carefully. Not every frustration is moral injury, and not every physician's disagreement with policy means the physician is ethically correct. The concept is most useful when it names durable injury to moral agency caused by repeated constraints, betrayal, or forced participation in practices that contradict professional commitments. It shifts the question from "Why can't doctors cope?" to "What are we asking doctors to become?"

Professional Identity and the Loss of the Physician Self Medical education is identity formation. Students and residents learn anatomy, pharmacology, diagnosis, procedure, and evidence. Still, they also learn how a physician sees, speaks, doubts, prioritizes, responds to suffering, bears responsibility, and belongs to a profession. The professional identity formation literature argues that becoming a physician involves internalizing the profession's values, norms, and obligations (Cruess et al., 2014; Jarvis-Selinger et al., 2012). The hidden curriculum shapes identity through what institutions reward, ignore, tolerate, and punish (Hafferty & Franks, 1994).

This is where the concept of burnout as professional identity injury becomes useful. The manuscript that prompted this review argues that some burnout is the visible sign of a deeper erosion of professional self-recognition (Lesaca, 2026). It uses Kohut's self psychology as a lens: the self remains cohesive through recognition, idealization, and coherence, as well as through a sense of belonging (Banai, Mikulincer, & Shaver, 2005; Kohut, 1971, 1977, 1984). Translated into professional life, physicians need their judgment to be recognized, institutional ideals to retain credibility, and colleagues to share a moral reality. When these conditions fail, doctors may continue to perform tasks while feeling less like the physicians they intended to become.

This conceptual account aligns with empirical findings on professional fulfillment. The Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index and related work distinguish burnout from fulfillment, which includes happiness, meaningfulness, contribution, self-worth, satisfaction, and feeling in control when dealing with difficult work problems (Trockel et al., 2018). Studies of intention to leave show that lack of professional fulfillment is not merely the inverse of burnout; it is an independent retention signal (Ligibel et al., 2023). Physicians may leave not only because distress is high but also because the work no longer returns enough meaning.

Identity injury also explains why some system interventions fail. A meditation app may reduce stress, but it does not restore recognition if clinical judgment is routinely overridden. A wellness lecture may be resented if physicians are then asked to complete more documentation, see more patients, and absorb more staffing gaps. A "resilience" campaign may feel insulting if the unspoken message is that the physician should become better adapted to incoherence.

Professional identity injury appears in language. Physicians say, "It will never be approved," "There is no point escalating," "I can't practice the way I was trained," "This is not medicine anymore," or "I do not recognize myself." These statements are not simply complaints. They are early warning signs that the physician's internal professional map no longer matches the work environment.

Leadership, Culture, and Value Congruence 

Leadership is a measurable contributor to physician well-being. Shanafelt and colleagues found that physicians' ratings of immediate supervisor leadership behaviors were associated with burnout and satisfaction (Shanafelt, Gorringe, Menaker, et al., 2015). Shanafelt and Noseworthy later proposed nine organizational strategies to promote physician engagement and reduce burnout, including leadership commitment, measurement, workload management, flexibility, efficiency, community, culture, and self-care resources (Shanafelt & Noseworthy, 2017).

The leadership literature matters because burnout is not produced only by tasks; it is produced by the meaning given to tasks. Physicians can tolerate scarcity more readily when leaders are honest, present, clinically credible, and willing to share accountability. They are more likely to leave when leaders use mission language while ignoring operational contradictions. Value incongruence is corrosive: organizations proclaim compassion, safety, equity, and excellence while rewarding volume, throughput, denial avoidance, and dashboard compliance.

Trust is central. A physician who trusts leadership may view a burdensome change as a necessary hardship. A physician who distrusts leadership interprets the same change as exploitation. Trust is built through transparency, follow-through, clinician involvement, visible sacrifice by leaders, and willingness to remove low-value work. It is destroyed when leaders ask for input but do not act, frame structural problems as attitude problems, or celebrate resilience while preserving the causes of distress.

Culture also determines whether physicians can speak. A quiet physician workforce is not necessarily a healthy workforce. It may be a workforce that has learned the cost of objection. Psychological safety, ethics forums, morbidity and mortality conferences that include system factors, peer support, and leadership listening sessions can help, but only when connected to change. Without action, listening becomes extraction.

Gender, Race, Caregiving, Discrimination, and Mistreatment 

Burnout and departure are not evenly distributed. Women physicians often carry disproportionate caregiving responsibilities, face pregnancy and parenting penalties, experience gender bias in evaluations and promotion, receive more patient messages in some settings, and are more likely to experience sexual harassment and discrimination (Hu et al., 2019; Lyubarova et al., 2023; Templeton et al., 2019). These factors are not side issues; they shape retention.

The resident and trainee literature is particularly stark. Hu and colleagues' national study of surgical residents found high rates of mistreatment, discrimination, harassment, burnout symptoms, and suicidal thoughts (Hu et al., 2019). Mistreatment is a driver of burnout because it attacks a sense of belonging and dignity and normalizes suffering as part of professional formation. When trainees learn that silence is safer than reporting, they internalize the hidden curriculum of self-erasure.

Race and ethnicity also affect physician experience, although the literature is less complete than it should be. Physicians from underrepresented groups may face isolation, racism, patient bias, microaggressions, disproportionate diversity labor, and pressure to represent communities while lacking institutional support (NASEM, 2019; Office of the Surgeon General, 2022). Burnout interventions that ignore discrimination risk, treating distress as individual fragility rather than exposure to inequitable systems.

Caregiving is a major departure mechanism. Chen and colleagues found that women physicians who left clinical practice early were more likely than men to cite children or family caregiving as reasons for doing so (Chen et al., 2026). This should not be interpreted as women lacking commitment. It shows that medical careers are still often designed around an ideal worker with uninterrupted availability, externalized caregiving, and minimal domestic responsibility. Retention requires childcare support, predictable scheduling, parental leave, lactation support, flexible career pathways, part-time tracks without stigma, and promotion systems that do not penalize caregiving.

Training, Early-Career Vulnerability, and the Pipeline Burnout does not begin at midcareer. Medical students and residents show high rates of depression, anxiety, burnout, suicidal ideation, and mistreatment (Hu et al., 2019; Mata et al., 2015; Rotenstein, Ramos, Torre, et al., 2016). Training cultures often teach that exhaustion is proof of dedication and that asking for help risks judgment. Trainees also have less control over schedules, rotations, evaluations, and institutional policies.

Professional identity formation during training can be protective or injurious. When trainees see skilled physicians practicing with integrity in supportive teams, they learn that medicine is demanding but meaningful. When they see cynicism rewarded, corners cut, unsafe conditions normalized, or advocacy punished, they learn that survival requires narrowing. This early learning influences later retention.

Residents and fellows are also making career decisions in a different market than the one older physicians entered. They graduate into educational debt, high housing costs, complex employment contracts, corporatized practice, productivity metrics, digital inboxes, and public distrust. They have more visible nonclinical alternatives, including health technology, consulting, finance, policy, entrepreneurship, utilization management, informatics, and coaching. If clinical practice feels incompatible with health, family, and identity, leaving may seem rational rather than tragic.

Training programs should therefore treat well-being as a core educational outcome. This does not mean reducing rigor or avoiding suffering. It means teaching physicians to practice in teams, navigate moral distress, use technology safely, set boundaries, ask for help, advocate effectively, understand health systems, and recognize that self-destruction is not professionalism.

Corporatization, Consolidation, Payment Pressure, and Professional Autonomy 

The ownership and financing of medical practice have changed substantially. AMA practice benchmark data show a long-term decline in physician-owned practice and growth in employed practice, hospital ownership, and corporate or private equity involvement (AMA, 2026b). Consolidation can bring capital, infrastructure, negotiation power, and administrative support. It can also intensify productivity pressure, reduce local autonomy, and make clinical decisions feel subordinate to financial targets.

The literature on private equity and corporate practice raises concerns about cost, quality, staffing, clinical autonomy, and professional ethics, although effects vary by setting and evidence continues to evolve (Fuse Brown & Hall, 2024; Tewfik et al., 2024). For burnout, the key mechanism is not the ownership label alone. It is whether physicians experience the organization as supporting professional judgment or extracting productivity from it. A physician can feel respected in a large employed group and exploited in a small private practice; conversely, employment can feel safe or alienating depending on governance.

Payment policy shapes burnout indirectly. Fee-for-service can reward volume over time and relational care; value-based payment can reduce unnecessary care but add reporting burden; underinvestment in primary care can make comprehensive care financially impossible; and Medicare payment pressure can shift organizations toward productivity demands (Commonwealth Fund, 2025; KFF, 2025). When payment models fail to support cognitive work, care coordination, message management, behavioral health, and team infrastructure, physicians end up paying for after-hours labor.

Financialization also affects identity. Physicians often accept stewardship obligations and understand scarcity. What is injurious is the sense that clinical ideals are being subordinated to opaque revenue logic while mission language remains unchanged. A system can be financially constrained without being morally incoherent. The difference lies in honesty, shared governance, and the visible alignment of resources with stated values.

Patient Complexity, Violence, Incivility, and Boundaryless Access 

Patients are sicker, older, and more socially complex than many clinical systems are designed to support. Population aging, multimorbidity, polypharmacy, mental health needs, social isolation, housing insecurity, and caregiver scarcity increase the work of medicine (AAMC, 2024). Physicians may be expected to solve problems created by fragmented insurance, poverty, addiction, loneliness, and insufficient social services in brief visits.

Patient portal access has expanded expectations for rapid, asynchronous physician response. This can improve care, but when uncompensated and unstaffed, it becomes boundaryless labor. Physicians may feel they are failing patients not because they lack commitment, but because demand exceeds human capacity.

Violence and incivility further strain the workforce. Health care workplace violence has been described as a growing global problem, associated with unmet expectations, long waits, poor communication, and resource constraints (O'Brien et al., 2024). Violence affects not only immediate safety but also trust, sleep, vigilance, and willingness to remain in high-risk settings. Institutions have an ethical obligation to protect health workers; kindness campaigns alone are inadequate without reporting systems, security, de-escalation training, staffing, environmental design, and consequences for abusive behavior.

Patients are not the enemy. Many patient behaviors that burden clinicians arise from fear, pain, confusion, financial stress, system delays, and lack of access. The retention issue is that physicians often become the human face of systemic failure. They absorb anger for wait times, insurance denials, drug shortages, referral delays, and unaffordable care. Sustainable medicine requires systems that protect both patients and clinicians from being placed against one another.

Mental Health, Depression, Suicide, and Help-Seeking Barriers 

Physician burnout intersects with mental health, but should not be collapsed into it. Meta-analyses show substantial depression and depressive symptoms among medical students and residents (Mata et al., 2015; Rotenstein, Ramos, Torre, et al., 2016). Burnout has been associated with depression, anxiety, medical errors, and suicidal ideation, although causal relationships and confounding vary across studies (Menon et al., 2020; Ryan et al., 2023). A recent BMJ meta-analysis found that female physicians had elevated suicide risk compared with women in the general population. In contrast, male physician risk was closer to the male general-population comparison in more recent data, underscoring the need for nuanced interpretation rather than blanket claims (Zimmermann et al., 2024).

Help-seeking barriers remain a major concern. Physicians may fear licensing, credentialing, malpractice, reputation, or career consequences if they seek mental health or substance use care. The Dr. Lorna Breen Heroes' Foundation and partner organizations have advocated for licensure and credentialing reforms to remove intrusive questions about past mental health treatment and to focus on current impairment (Dr. Lorna Breen Heroes' Foundation, 2026; Simmons, Feist, & Segres, 2024). The Surgeon General's Advisory explicitly calls for reducing punitive policies that deter health workers from seeking care (Office of the Surgeon General, 2022).

Mental health support is a retention infrastructure. Confidential counseling, peer support, crisis response, protected time for care, nonpunitive leave, licensing reform, and leadership normalization of help-seeking are not perks. They are safety systems. However, mental health care should not be used to individualize structural injury. A physician who is depressed needs treatment. A physician demoralized by unsafe staffing needs both support and staffing repair.

Consequences for Patients, Teams, and Health Systems Burnout is not only a physician welfare issue. It affects patients, teams, organizations, and public health. Meta-analyses link physician burnout with lower quality of care, lower patient satisfaction, unprofessional behavior, patient safety events, and career disengagement (Hodkinson et al., 2022; Panagioti et al., 2018). Causality is complex: unsafe systems may cause both burnout and errors, and burned-out clinicians may be more likely to perceive errors. Nonetheless, the association is strong enough that patient safety organizations treat clinician well-being as a safety priority.

Burnout affects teams through irritability, withdrawal, reduced teaching, communication failure, absenteeism, turnover, and loss of informal leadership. Experienced physicians often hold teams together by knowing local workarounds, mentoring younger clinicians, and translating system dysfunction into workable care. When they leave, a clinic or service loses more than scheduled hours.

Burnout also affects patient access. Reduced hours and departure decrease appointment availability, continuity, and regional capacity. The effect is most severe in primary care, psychiatry, rural medicine, safety-net settings, and specialties with long training pipelines. Workforce shortages then increase demand on remaining physicians, creating a self-reinforcing cycle.

Finally, burnout has a moral cost. Patients want doctors who are skilled and humane. Physicians want to practice with attention and integrity. A system that routinely exhausts or alienates physicians harms the relational core of medicine, even when quality dashboards remain acceptable.

Why Wellness Is Necessary but Not Enough 

Individual wellness interventions can help. Mindfulness programs, stress management, coaching, peer support, reduced stigma, therapy, sleep, exercise, and self-compassion may improve well-being for some physicians. Meta-analyses suggest that both individual-focused and organizational interventions can reduce burnout, with organizational interventions often showing particular promise (Panagioti et al., 2017; West, Dyrbye, Erwin, & Shanafelt, 2016). The error is not offering wellness; the error is substituting wellness for work redesign.

Wellness becomes counterproductive when it implies that physicians should adapt to harmful systems. A yoga class does not fix an unsafe schedule. A gratitude exercise does not reduce the burden of prior authorization. A resilience lecture does not align authority and responsibility. A meditation app does not restore trust in leadership. Physicians often resent wellness programs not because they reject self-care, but because they perceive institutional misrecognition.

The NASEM report and the Surgeon General's Advisory both emphasize system-level action: reducing administrative burden, improving technology, redesigning work, protecting mental health, addressing inequity, strengthening teams, improving leadership, and rebuilding community (NASEM, 2019; Office of the Surgeon General, 2022). This aligns with the identity-injury model. Repair must occur where injury occurs: in the relationship between physicians and the systems in which they practice.

What Repair Requires: 

A Retention-Oriented Framework Repair begins with measurement, but cannot end there. Organizations should measure burnout, professional fulfillment, moral distress, turnover, reduced hours, EHR time, after-hours work, inbox volume, staffing ratios, prior authorization burden, schedule control, leadership trust, discrimination, mistreatment, and psychological safety. Measurement should be stratified by specialty, gender, race, career stage, employment status, and site. But dashboards must lead to action. Measuring suffering without changing conditions compounds distrust.

Second, organizations must reduce low-value work. This includes eliminating unnecessary documentation, simplifying note templates, limiting inbox noise, using team-based message triage, standardizing refill protocols, reducing duplicative forms, reviewing quality measures for clinical value, and automating only where automation truly reduces human burden. The central question should be: Does this task require a physician's judgment? If not, why is a physician doing it?

Third, systems must align responsibility with authority. Physicians should have meaningful input into schedules, staffing, workflows, technology, quality metrics, and resource allocation. When organizations override clinical judgment, they should share accountability for consequences. Denials, delays, and resource limits should be transparent and clinically intelligible.

Fourth, teams must be rebuilt. Medical assistants, nurses, pharmacists, care managers, social workers, behavioral health clinicians, scribes, and referral coordinators should be seen as part of the retention infrastructure. Team-based care should be funded, trained, and measured. A physician without a reliable team is not a heroic individual; they are an expensive bottleneck in an underdesigned system.

Fifth, moral distress requires a response pathway. Ethics consultation, moral distress rounds, peer support, leadership escalation, policy review, and debriefings should be available before clinicians collapse. Repeated moral distress events should be treated as system signals rather than merely emotional reactions.

Sixth, leadership accountability must become concrete. Leaders should be evaluated in part on clinician well-being, turnover, trust, and responsiveness to the burden. Leadership walkarounds should include follow-up. Physicians should see what changed as a result of their speaking.

Seventh, equity and caregiving support are retention strategies. Flexible schedules, parental leave, childcare, lactation support, anti-harassment enforcement, salary equity, promotion equity, and part-time career pathways keep physicians in medicine. They also signal that the profession no longer requires self-erasure as the price of belonging.

Eighth, mental health care must be protected. Licensing and credentialing applications should focus on current impairment, not past treatment. Confidential access to care should be normalized. Physicians should not have to choose between treatment and career security.

Ninth, payment and policy reform must reduce administrative burden. Payers should streamline or eliminate low-value prior authorization, improve transparency, reduce duplicative documentation, and support team-based care. Regulators should consider the clinician's time cost of every new requirement. Payment models should fund cognitive work, care coordination, inbox management, behavioral health integration, and social complexity.

Tenth, organizations must restore credible ideals. Mission statements should be tested against scheduling, staffing, productivity targets, documentation rules, and leadership decisions. Physicians do not need perfect systems. They need systems honest enough that professional ideals can still be used as anchors.

Research Gaps Several gaps remain. 

First, studies should move beyond cross-sectional associations to longitudinal designs linking burnout, moral distress, EHR burden, staffing, and leadership to actual turnover, reduced hours, patient outcomes, and early retirement. The 2026 family physician turnover study is an important step because it links survey data to subsequent claims-based practice behavior (Khullar et al., 2026).

Second, moral distress and moral injury require better operationalization in health care. The field needs validated tools, specialty-specific studies, longitudinal designs, and interventions that distinguish moral distress from burnout while addressing overlap (Mantri et al., 2020; Tutty et al., 2026).

Third, more research is needed on early clinical departure after training. Physicians who leave direct care early are difficult to study because they disappear from conventional workforce datasets. Understanding their paths could reveal preventable failures in training, practice design, caregiving support, and professional identity formation (Chen et al., 2026).

Fourth, the literature needs stronger equity analysis. Burnout research often adjusts for gender and race but does not fully examine racism, sexism, harassment, pregnancy discrimination, disability, LGBTQ+ identity, international medical graduate status, or intersectional burden.

Fifth, intervention research needs better implementation details. Many studies show modest average effects but do not explain which components work, for whom, in which settings, at what cost, or for how long. The field needs comparative studies of inbox redesign, team-based care, prior authorization reform, AI documentation, staffing investments, leadership accountability, and flexible scheduling.

Sixth, research should measure positive outcomes, not only symptom reduction. Professional fulfillment, meaning, agency, trust, belonging, moral repair, and joy in practice are not sentimental extras. They may be the strongest retention variables.

Clinical Synthesis: How Burnout Leads to Departure 

The literature explains physician burnout in epidemiologic, organizational, ethical, and economic terms. Synthesized clinically, the evidence shows that the decision to leave rarely begins as a single declaration. It often develops gradually, from tolerating difficult work to experiencing clinical practice as misaligned with professional judgment, agency, and identity. These themes synthesize recurring findings from the literature into a non-anecdotal synthesis of clinical work, retention risk, and organizational repair.

Tired is not the same as alienated 

This distinction is central to understanding early departure. Physicians do not necessarily leave because medicine is difficult; many entered medicine expecting it to be difficult. They leave when difficulty is joined to loss of control, loss of meaning, and loss of recognizable professional agency. That pattern is consistent with the organizational burnout literature and with the provided manuscript's claim that some burnout reflects erosion of professional self-recognition rather than fatigue alone (Lesaca, 2026; NASEM, 2019; West et al., 2018).

After-hours inbox work 

After-hours inbox work is not merely a failure of time management; it is a measurable burden on EHR systems and desktop medicine. Time-motion and EHR-log studies show substantial physician time devoted to electronic documentation and desktop medicine, including work outside scheduled hours (Arndt et al., 2017; Mandal et al., 2024; Sinsky et al., 2016; Tai-Seale et al., 2017). Boundaryless digital work converts professional commitment into continuous availability, making part-time reduction or departure appear less like escape and more like self-preservation.

Prior authorization and the loss of voice 

Prior authorization is often defended as a form of utilization management, and some oversight is legitimate. The corrosive effect arises when recurrent delays, opaque criteria, repeated documentation, and denial reversals teach physicians that responsibility remains at the bedside while authority moves elsewhere. Surveys and policy analyses consistently identify prior authorization as a major contributor to administrative burden, care delays, and frustration (AMA, 2025b; Sahni et al., 2024). From a retention perspective, the injury is cumulative: each denial may be survivable, but the repeated experience can make full advocacy feel futile.

Moral distress and second-best care 

This dynamic reflects moral distress. Moral distress does not require the physician to be always correct or the institution to be always wrong. It occurs when clinicians experience a gap between ethically appropriate care and the actions available within the system. The moral injury literature indicates that repeated exposure can harm moral agency, trust, and identity (Dean et al., 2019; Epstein & Hamric, 2009; Jameton, 1984; Litz et al., 2009; Tutty et al., 2026). This is one reason burnout language can feel inadequate: physicians may not only feel depleted but also implicated in compromises they did not choose.

Responsibility without authority 

Responsibility without authority is one of the most powerful pathways from burnout to departure. Physicians can accept accountability when they also possess meaningful influence over care conditions. When influence is repeatedly removed, accountability begins to feel like exposure rather than professionalism. This dynamic links autonomy, leadership trust, staffing, moral distress, and intention to leave (Shanafelt & Noseworthy, 2017; Shanafelt et al., 2015; Tutty et al., 2026; West et al., 2018).

Gradual withdrawal before leaving 

Early departure often develops as a sequence of withdrawals rather than a sudden exit. The physician may reduce hours, leave an organization, shift to nonclinical work, retire early, or remain employed while narrowing engagement. This continuum is supported by the literature linking burnout and professional fulfillment to intentions to reduce hours, to leave, to turnover, and to early clinical departure (Chen et al., 2026; Hamidi et al., 2018; Khullar et al., 2026; Rotenstein et al., 2026). Retention strategies must therefore attend to early signals, not only resignations.

Caregiving burdens and inequity 

The burden of burnout is unevenly distributed. Women physicians and physicians with caregiving responsibilities often carry additional patient expectations, domestic labor, gender bias, harassment risk, and career penalties for pregnancy, parenting, or flexible schedules. The literature on gender differences in burnout and mistreatment supports treating caregiving support and equity as retention infrastructure rather than optional benefits (Hu et al., 2019; Lyubarova et al., 2023; Templeton et al., 2019).

What trainees learn by watching 

Training environments transmit more than clinical knowledge. The hidden curriculum teaches trainees what the profession actually rewards, tolerates, and silences. If residents learn early that advocacy is punished, staffing concerns are ignored, or empathy is incompatible with productivity, they may complete training already imagining an exit from direct care. This is why professional identity formation and the learning environment belong in any account of burnout and early departure (Cruess et al., 2014; Hafferty & Franks, 1994; Jarvis-Selinger et al., 2012).

Help-seeking barriers and licensing concerns 

Burnout, depression, trauma exposure, and suicidal ideation are not identical, but they overlap enough that help-seeking must be protected. Licensing and credentialing questions that overstep into past diagnoses or treatments can discourage physicians from seeking care. National advocacy and policy guidance increasingly call for focusing on current impairment rather than past help-seeking (Dr. Lorna Breen Heroes' Foundation, 2026; Simmons et al., 2024; Surgeon General, 2022). A system that wants physicians to stay must make treatment accessible.

Staying while narrowing professional engagement 

This dynamic aligns with the identity framework in the supplied manuscript. The risk is not only that physicians leave; it is also that many stay, losing their voice, reach, and professional self-recognition (Lesaca, 2026). Professional fulfillment instruments and organizational studies suggest that meaning, agency, and culture are not decorative aspects of work. They are measurable and consequential elements of retention (Shanafelt et al., 2015; Trockel et al., 2018).

Visible repair as the basis for retention 

The most persuasive retention strategy is therefore not a slogan about resilience. It is a visible repair. Physicians are more likely to stay when systems reduce low-value work, improve team support, align responsibility with authority, protect mental health, support caregivers, address inequity, and rebuild trust through action (NASEM, 2019; Shanafelt & Noseworthy, 2017; Surgeon General, 2022; West et al., 2016). Visible operational repair clarifies whether stated institutional values are credible in daily clinical practice.

Conclusion: 

Why Doctors Are Leaving Earlier 

Doctors are leaving earlier because the bargain of medical practice has changed. Medicine has always required hard work, uncertainty, grief, and sacrifice. What has become less tolerable is the combination of high responsibility, diminished authority, expanding administrative work, boundaryless digital access, inadequate staffing, moral contradiction, inequity, and leadership cultures that too often ask physicians to adapt rather than repair the work.

The physician who contemplates leaving is not necessarily rejecting patients or medicine. 

Often, the decision reflects an effort to preserve health, family life, moral agency, and a recognizable professional identity in a system that has made those commitments harder to sustain. Retention, therefore, cannot be framed as convincing physicians to care more; most already care deeply. The task is to rebuild conditions in which caring does not require progressive self-erasure.

Burnout explains part of this story. 

Moral distress explains another part. 

Professional identity injury explains why the same burden can feel not merely tiring but alienating. Physicians do not leave only because they are exhausted. They leave when they can no longer practice in a way that feels coherent with the physician they trained to become, when the work repeatedly asks them to betray patients, family, body, judgment, or self, and when available alternatives appear more humane.

The solution is to make medicine worth staying in. 

That requires work redesign, administrative simplification, team investment, payer reform, mental health protection, equity, leadership accountability, and restoration of professional voice. 

The goal is not an easy profession. 

Medicine will never be easy. The goal is a profession difficult in the right ways: difficult because patients suffer, uncertainty is real, and moral responsibility matters; not difficult because preventable administrative, technological, and organizational failures consume the physician's capacity to care.

References 

American Medical Association. (2025). U.S. physician burnout hits lowest rate since COVID-19. American Medical Association.

American Medical Association. (2025b). 2025 AMA prior authorization physician survey. American Medical Association.

American Medical Association. (2026). Physician burnout rate continues to decline, falling to nearly 42%. American Medical Association.

American Medical Association. (2026b). Physician practice benchmark survey: Practice ownership and employment trends. American Medical Association.

Arndt, B. G., Beasley, J. W., Watkinson, M. D., Temte, J. L., Tuan, W. J., Sinsky, C. A., & Gilchrist, V. J. (2017). Tethered to the EHR: Primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Annals of Family Medicine, 15(5), 419-426. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2121

Association of American Medical Colleges. (2024). New AAMC report shows continuing projected physician shortage—association of American Medical Colleges.

Banai, E., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2005). "Selfobject" needs in Kohut's self psychology: Links with attachment, self-cohesion, affect regulation, and adjustment. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 22(2), 224-260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.22.2.224

Bodenheimer, T., & Sinsky, C. A. (2014). From triple to quadruple aim: Care of the patient requires care of the provider. Annals of Family Medicine, 12(6), 573-576. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1713

Chen, S., Carlasare, L., Brown, R., & Tutty, M. (2026). Why have all the doctors gone? Insights into early clinical departure among physicians in the United States: A national survey. The Permanente Journal. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/25.219

Commonwealth Fund. (2025). Rebuilding primary care: Payment, administrative burden, and workforce sustainability. Commonwealth Fund.

Cruess, R. L., Cruess, S. R., Boudreau, J. D., Snell, L., & Steinert, Y. (2014). Reframing medical education to support professional identity formation. Academic Medicine, 89(11), 1446-1451. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000427

Dean, W., Morris, D., Manzur, M. K., & Talbot, S. (2024). Moral injury in health care: A unified definition and its relationship to burnout. Federal Practitioner, 41(4), 104-107. https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0467

Dean, W., Talbot, S., & Dean, A. (2019). Reframing clinician distress: Moral injury, not burnout. Federal Practitioner, 36(9), 400-402.

Dr. Lorna Breen Heroes' Foundation. (2026). Improving licensure and credentialing applications. Dr. Lorna Breen Heroes' Foundation.

Epstein, E. G., & Hamric, A. B. (2009). Moral distress, moral residue, and the crescendo effect. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 20(4), 330-342.

Freudenberger, H. J. (1974). Staff burnout. Journal of Social Issues, 30(1), 159-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x

Fuse Brown, E. C., & Hall, M. A. (2024). Private equity and the corporatization of health care. Stanford Law Review, 76, 527-595.

Garcia, P., Ma, S. P., Shah, S., Smith, M., Jeong, J. M., Devon-Sand, A., ... Shah, N. H. (2024). Artificial intelligence-generated draft replies to patient inbox messages. JAMA Network Open, 7(3), e243201. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3201

Hafferty, F. W., & Franks, R. (1994). The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Academic Medicine, 69(11), 861-871. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199411000-00001

Hamidi, M. S., Bohman, B., Sandborg, C., Smith-Coggins, R., de Vries, P., Albert, M. S., Murphy, M. L., Welle, D., & Trockel, M. T. (2018). Estimating institutional physician turnover attributable to self-reported burnout and associated financial burden: A case study. BMC Health Services Research, 18, 851. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3663-z

Han, S., Shanafelt, T. D., Sinsky, C. A., Awad, K. M., Dyrbye, L. N., Fiscus, L. C., Trockel, M., & Goh, J. (2019). Estimating the attributable cost of physician burnout in the United States. Annals of Internal Medicine, 170(11), 784-790. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-1422

Hodkinson, A., Zhou, A., Johnson, J., Geraghty, K., Riley, R., Zhou, A., Panagopoulou, E., Chew-Graham, C. A., Peters, D., Esmail, A., & Panagioti, M. (2022). Associations of physician burnout with career engagement and quality of patient care: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 378, e070442. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-070442

Holmgren, A. J., Hendrix, N., Maisel, N. C., Everson, J., Bazemore, A., Rotenstein, L. S., Phillips, R. L., & Adler-Milstein, J. (2024). Electronic health record usability, satisfaction, and burnout for family physicians. JAMA Network Open, 7(8), e2426956. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26956

Hu, Y. Y., Ellis, R. J., Hewitt, D. B., Yang, A. D., Cheung, E. O., Moskowitz, J. T., Potts, J. R., Buyske, J., Hoyt, D. B., Nasca, T. J., & Bilimoria, K. Y. (2019). Discrimination, abuse, harassment, and burnout in surgical residency training. New England Journal of Medicine, 381(18), 1741-1752. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1903759

Jameton, A. (1984). Nursing practice: The ethical issues. Prentice-Hall.

Jarvis-Selinger, S., Pratt, D. D., & Regehr, G. (2012). Competency is not enough: Integrating identity formation into the discourse of medical education. Academic Medicine, 87(9), 1185-1190. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182604968

Khullar, D., Casalino, L. P., Kronick, R. G., Petersen, L. E., Tai-Seale, M., Wen, J., Zhang, M., & Bond, A. M. (2026). Turnover and burnout among family physicians. JAMA Internal Medicine, 186(5), 635-637. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2026.0271

KFF. (2025). Medicare physician payment and the 2025 physician fee schedule. KFF.

Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self: A systematic approach to the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders. International Universities Press.

Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. International Universities Press.

Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure? University of Chicago Press.

Lesaca, T. (2026). Burnout beyond exhaustion: The loss of the physician self in modern medicine [Unpublished manuscript].

Ligibel, J. A., Goularte, N., Berliner, J. I., Bird, S. B., Brazauskas, R., Dandar, V., et al. (2023). Well-being parameters and intention to leave current institution among academic physicians. JAMA Network Open, 6(12), e2347894. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.47894

Litz, B. T., Stein, N., Delaney, E., Lebowitz, L., Nash, W. P., Silva, C., & Maguen, S. (2009). Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: A preliminary model and intervention strategy. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(8), 695-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.07.003

Lyubarova, R., Itzhaki, M., & Pourmand, A. (2023). Women physicians and burnout: Gender-specific contributors and solutions. The Permanente Journal, 27.

Mandal, S., Wiesenfeld, B. M., Mann, D. M., Szerencsy, A. C., Iturrate, E., & Nov, O. (2024). Quantifying the impact of telemedicine and patient medical advice request messages on physicians' work outside work. npj Digital Medicine, 7, 60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01001-2

Mantri, S., Lawson, J. M., Wang, Z., & Koenig, H. G. (2020). Identifying moral injury in healthcare professionals: The Moral Injury Symptom Scale-HP. Journal of Religion and Health, 59(5), 2323-2340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-020-01065-w

Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2(2), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205

Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(2), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20311

Mata, D. A., Ramos, M. A., Bansal, N., Khan, R., Guille, C., Di Angelantonio, E., & Sen, S. (2015). Prevalence of depression and depressive symptoms among resident physicians: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA, 314(22), 2373-2383. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.15845

Menon, N. K., Shanafelt, T. D., Sinsky, C. A., Linzer, M., Carlasare, L., Brady, K. J. S., Stillman, M. J., & Trockel, M. T. (2020). Association of physician burnout with suicidal ideation and medical errors. JAMA Network Open, 3(12), e2028780. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.28780

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Taking action against clinician burnout: A systems approach to professional well-being. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25521

O'Brien, C. J., van Zundert, A. A. J., & Barach, P. R. (2024). The growing burden of workplace violence against healthcare workers: Trends in prevalence, risk factors, consequences, and prevention - a narrative review. eClinicalMedicine, 72, 102641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102641

Office of the Surgeon General. (2022). Addressing health worker burnout: The U.S. Surgeon General's Advisory on building a thriving health workforce. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Panagioti, M., Geraghty, K., Johnson, J., Zhou, A., Panagopoulou, E., Chew-Graham, C., Peters, D., Hodkinson, A., Riley, R., & Esmail, A. (2018). Association between physician burnout and patient safety, professionalism, and patient satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine, 178(10), 1317-1331. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3713

Panagioti, M., Panagopoulou, E., Bower, P., Lewith, G., Kontopantelis, E., Chew-Graham, C., Dawson, S., van Marwijk, H., Geraghty, K., & Esmail, A. (2017). Controlled interventions to reduce burnout in physicians: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine, 177(2), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7674

Rotenstein, L. S., Hendrix, N., Phillips, R. L., & Adler-Milstein, J. (2024). Team and electronic health record features and burnout among family physicians. JAMA Network Open, 7(11), e2442687. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42687

Rotenstein, L. S., Holmgren, A. J., Downing, N. L., & Bates, D. W. (2023). System-level factors and time spent on electronic health records by primary care physicians. JAMA Network Open, 6(11), e2344713. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44713

Rotenstein, L. S., Ramos, M. A., Torre, M., Segal, J. B., Peluso, M. J., Guille, C., Sen, S., & Mata, D. A. (2016). Prevalence of depression, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation among medical students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA, 316(21), 2214-2236. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.17324

Rotenstein, L. S., Shah, P., Brown, R., Farley, H., Shanafelt, T. D., & Sinsky, C. A. (2026). Physicians' intent to reduce hours and intent to leave organizations. JAMA Network Open, 9(5), e2611045. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.11045

Rotenstein, L. S., Torre, M., Ramos, M. A., Rosales, R. C., Guille, C., Sen, S., & Mata, D. A. (2018). Prevalence of burnout among physicians: A systematic review. JAMA, 320(11), 1131-1150. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.12777

Ryan, E., Hore, K., Power, J., & Jackson, T. (2023). The relationship between physician burnout and depression, anxiety, suicidality, and substance use: A mixed methods systematic review. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1133484. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1133484

Sahni, N. R., Istvan, B., Stafford, C., & Cutler, D. M. (2024). Perceptions of prior authorization burden and solutions. Health Affairs Scholar, 2(9), qxae096. https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae096

Shanafelt, T. D., Gorringe, G., Menaker, R., Storz, K. A., Reeves, D., Buskirk, S. J., Sloan, J. A., & Swensen, S. J. (2015). Impact of organizational leadership on physician burnout and satisfaction. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 90(4), 432-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.01.012

Shanafelt, T. D., Hasan, O., Dyrbye, L. N., Sinsky, C. A., Satele, D., Sloan, J., & West, C. P. (2015). Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance in physicians and the general U.S. working population between 2011 and 2014. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 90(12), 1600-1613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.08.023

Shanafelt, T. D., & Noseworthy, J. H. (2017). Executive leadership and physician well-being: Nine organizational strategies to promote engagement and reduce burnout. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 92(1), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.004

Shanafelt, T. D., West, C. P., Sinsky, C. A., Trockel, M., Tutty, M., Satele, D. V., Carlasare, L. E., & Dyrbye, L. N. (2019). Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-life integration in physicians and the general U.S. working population between 2011 and 2017. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 94(9), 1681-1694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.10.023

Shanafelt, T. D., West, C. P., Sinsky, C. A., Trockel, M., Tutty, M., Wang, H., Carlasare, L. E., & Dyrbye, L. N. (2022). Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-life integration in physicians during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 97(12), 2248-2258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.09.002

Shanafelt, T. D., West, C. P., Sinsky, C. A., Trockel, M., Tutty, M., Wang, H., Carlasare, L. E., & Dyrbye, L. N. (2025). Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-life integration in physicians and the general U.S. working population between 2011 and 2023. Mayo Clinic Proceedings.

Shay, J. (1994). Achilles in Vietnam: Combat trauma and the undoing of character. Scribner.

Silver, M. P., Hamilton, A. D., Biswas, A., & Warrick, N. I. (2016). A systematic review of physician retirement planning. Human Resources for Health, 14, 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-016-0166-z

Simmons, S., Feist, J. C., & Segres, A. (2024). Changing licensing and credentialing applications to promote health workers' mental health, Virginia, December 2022-September 2023. American Journal of Public Health, 114(S2), S152-S155. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307506

Sinsky, C. A., Colligan, L., Li, L., Prgomet, M., Reynolds, S., Goeders, L., Westbrook, J., Tutty, M., & Blike, G. (2016). Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: A time and motion study in four specialties. Annals of Internal Medicine, 165(11), 753-760. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-0961

Sinsky, C. A., Shanafelt, T. D., Dyrbye, L. N., Sabety, A. H., Carlasare, L. E., & West, C. P. (2022). Health care expenditures attributable to primary care physicians overall and burnout-related turnover: A cross-sectional analysis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 97(4), 693-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.09.013

Tai-Seale, M., Olson, C. W., Li, J., Chan, A. S., Morikawa, C., Durbin, M., Wang, W., & Luft, H. S. (2017). Electronic health record logs indicate that physicians split time evenly between seeing patients and desktop medicine. Health Affairs, 36(4), 655-662. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0811

Templeton, K., Bernstein, C. A., Sukhera, J., Nora, L. M., Newman, C., Burstin, H., Guille, C., Lynn, L., Schwarze, M. L., Sen, S., & Busis, N. (2019). Gender-based differences in burnout: Issues faced by women physicians. NAM Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.31478/201905a

Tewfik, G., Grech, D., Laham, L., Chaudhry, F., & Naftalovich, R. (2024). The risks and benefits of physician practice acquisition and consolidation: A narrative review of peer-reviewed publications between 2009 and 2022 in the United States. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 17, 2271-2279. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S463618

Trockel, M., Bohman, B., Lesure, E., Hamidi, M. S., Welle, D., Roberts, L., & Shanafelt, T. (2018). A brief instrument to assess both burnout and professional fulfillment in physicians: Reliability and validity, including correlation with self-reported medical errors, in a sample of resident and practicing physicians. Academic Psychiatry, 42(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-017-0849-3

Tutty, M. A., West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., Wang, H., Carlasare, L. E., Sinsky, C. A., Trockel, M., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2026). Moral distress and occupational burnout in U.S. physicians. JAMA Network Open, 9(3), e263161. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.3161

West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., Erwin, P. J., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2016). Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet, 388(10057), 2272-2281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31279-X

West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2018). Physician burnout: Contributors, consequences, and solutions. Journal of Internal Medicine, 283(6), 516-529. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12752

World Health Organization. (2019). Burnout is an occupational phenomenon: International Classification of Diseases, 11th revision. World Health Organization.

You, J. G., Dbouk, R. H., Landman, A., Ting, D. Y., Dutta, S., Wang, J. C., Centi, A. J., Macfarlane, M., Bechor, E., Letourneau, J., Choo-Kang, G., Kim, E. H., Magee, C., Lang, B. J., Angelo, L., Olin, J., Frits, M., Iannaccone, C., Rui, A., ... Mishuris, R. G. (2025). Ambient documentation technology in the clinician experience of documentation burden and burnout. JAMA Network Open, 8(8), e2528056. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.28056

Zimmermann, C., Strohmaier, S., Herkner, H., Thau, K., Niederkrotenthaler, T., & Schernhammer, E. (2024). Suicide rates among physicians compared with the general population in studies from 20 countries: Gender stratified systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 386, e078964. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-078964