Hi, I'm a Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Global Development, working mostly on education policy. I've previously worked as an economist and advisor with the Governments of Rwanda, South Sudan, and the UK, and as a consultant for various international organisations and NGOs including the World Bank, AfDB, and ADB. I have a PhD in economics from the University of Sussex and also studied at the University of Oxford and the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London.
You can email me at lee.crawfurd at gmail.com or find me on twitter: @leecrawfurd or bluesky: @leecrawfurd.bsky.social
Journal Articles
Understanding Education Policy Preferences: Survey Experiments with Policymakers in 35 Developing Countries (2025), with Susannah Hares, Justin Sandefur, and Ana Minardi, World Development (Open Access), CGD Working Paper Version, CGD Blog Summary
Despite rapid increases in global access to primary school, average learning outcomes in many low and middle income countries remain low. International actors are increasingly focused on a policy agenda prioritizing foundational learning, measured by test scores in primary school. However, international actors have limited capacity to impose this agenda, which ultimately depends on national decision-makers. In this paper we present new evidence on the priorities and views of these national decision-makers. We report on a new survey of 931 senior government officials working on education in 35 low- and middle-income countries. We show with survey experiments that national policymakers place relatively low value on action to address foundational skills. We explain variation in preferences among policymakers as a function of three possible factors: different objectives for education (e.g., learning versus socialization), different beliefs about the state of the world (e.g., enrollment and learning levels), and different beliefs about the effectiveness of specific interventions. Misalignment with donor agendas is evident in all three dimensions. We also show experimentally that beliefs do respond to new evidence on the effectiveness of interventions.
Improving School Leadership in Rwanda (2025), with Simeon Lauterbach, Jocelyne C. Kirezi, Aimable Nsabimana, and Jef Peeraer, Journal of Development Economics, CGD Working Paper Version, CGD Blog Summary
Can effective school leadership enhance high-stakes test scores in low-income countries? To address this question, we examine the short-term impact of a school leadership professional development program that was implemented by VVOB across 525 primary schools in the six lowest-performing districts of Rwanda between 2018 and 2019. The program aimed to strengthen the leadership, management, and teacher support skills of school headteachers. We find that the program had small but statistically insignificant effects on Primary Leaving Examination scores within one to two years after the intervention. However, the program led to a five to six percentage point increase in teacher retention rates, with qualitative evidence suggesting that headteachers provided greater support to teachers, in particular during the onboarding process. Future research should focus on refining such programs and understanding which mechanisms are necessary to also improve learning outcomes of students.
Sexist textbooks: Automated analysis of gender bias in 1,255 books from 34 countries (2024), with Christelle Saintis-Miller and Rory Todd, PLOS One, CGD Working Paper Version, CGD Blog Summary, Coverage in the Daily Mail, Times of India, The Telegraph India, The Wire, Ideas for India
Textbooks play a critical role in schooling around the world. Small sample studies show that many books continue to under-represent women and girls, and to portray men and women in stereotypical gendered roles. In this paper, we use quantitative text analysis to assess the degree of gender bias in a newly assembled corpus of 1,255 English language school textbooks from 34 countries that are publicly available online. We find consistent patterns of under-representation of female characters and portrayal of stereotypical gendered roles. Women and girls appear less frequently, are portrayed as more passive, are less likely to be associated with work or achievement, and are more likely to be associated with the home and traditionally female occupations. Comparing across countries, female representation in books is correlated with higher GDP and more legal rights for women. Under-representation and stereotypes are a particular problem in South Asia.
The Effect of Lead Exposure on Children’s Learning in the Developing World: A Meta-Analysis (2024), with Rory Todd, Susannah Hares, Justin Sandefur, and Rachel Silverman, World Bank Research Observer (Open Access), CGD Working Paper Version, CGD Blog Summary, Coverage in the FT, Economist, and Guardian
Around half of children in low-income countries have elevated blood-lead levels. What role does lead play in explaining low educational outcomes in these settings? We conduct a new systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies on the relationship between lead exposure and learning outcomes. Adjusting for observable confounds and publication bias yields a benchmark estimate of a -0.12 standard-deviation reduction in learning per natural log unit of blood lead. As all estimates are non-experimental, we present evidence on the likely magnitude of unobserved confounding, and summarize results from a smaller set of natural experiments. Our benchmark estimate accounts for over a fifth of the gap in learning outcomes between rich and poor countries, and implies moderate learning gains from targeted interventions for highly exposed groups (~ 0.1 standard deviations) and modest learning gains (<0.05 standard deviations) from broader public health campaigns.
Feasibility First: Expanding Access Before Fixing Learning (2024), International Journal of Educational Development (Open Access)
The first SDG4 target is to both expand access to universal secondary school and to ensure that all children achieve minimum learning outcomes in primary school. To the extent that action must be prioritized, this article argues that achieving universal secondary education is both more feasible at scale and has clearer benefits than improving learning outcomes in primary schools in developing countries. Removing barriers to access such as fees and exam requirements has been demonstrated to have consistent impacts at scale, even in contexts of weak state capacity. By contrast, efforts to improve school quality have been much less consistent. Wage gains from secondary schooling have been demonstrated repeatedly, even in contexts of low quality education. Wage gains from improving primary school quality have not. Governments should thus focus on reforms that reliably expand access, rather than complex interventions to improve learning that often fail at scale.
Improving school management in low and middle income countries: A systematic review (2023), with Gautam Anand, Aishwarya Atluri, Todd Pugatch, and Ketki Sheth, Economics of Education Review, CGD Working Paper Version, CGD Blog Post Summary
Improving school quality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is a global priority. One way to improve quality may be to improve the management skills of school leaders. In this systematic review, we analyze the impact of interventions targeting school leaders' management practices on student learning. We begin by describing the characteristics and responsibilities of school leaders using data from large, multi-country surveys. Second, we review the literature and conduct a meta analysis of the causal effect of school management interventions on student learning, using 39 estimates from 20 evaluations. We estimate a statistically significant improvement in student learning of 0.04 standard deviations. We show that effect sizes are not related to program scale or intensity. We complement the meta-analysis by identifying common limitations to program effectiveness through a qualitative assessment of the studies included in our review. We find three main factors which mitigate program effectiveness: (1) low take-up; (2) lack of incentives or structure for implementation of recommendations; and (3) the lengthy causal chain linking management practices to student learning. Finally, to assess external validity of our review, we survey practitioners to compare characteristics between evaluated and commonly implemented programs. Our findings suggest that future work should focus on generating evidence on the marginal effect of common design elements in these interventions, including factors that promote school leader engagement and accountability.
Live Tutoring Calls Did Not Improve Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Sierra Leone (2023), with David K Evans, Susannah Hares, and Justin Sandefur, Journal of Development Economics, CGD Working Paper, CGD Blog post
Education systems regularly face unexpected school closures, whether due to disease outbreaks, natural disasters, or other adverse shocks. In low-income countries where internet access is scarce, distance learning—the most common educational solution—is often passive, via TV or radio, with little opportunity for teacher-student interaction. In this paper we evaluate the effectiveness of live tutoring calls from teachers, designed to supplement radio instruction, using a randomized controlled trial with 4,399 primary school students in Sierra Leone. Tutoring calls increased engagement in educational activity but had no effect on mathematics or language test scores, whether for girls or boys, and whether provided by public or private school teachers.
The Impact of Private Schools, School Chains and PPPs in Developing Countries (2023), with Susannah Hares and Rory Todd, World Bank Research Observer (Open Access)
The private school sector has expanded with almost no public intervention to educate half of primary school children in many urban centres in Africa and Asia. Simple comparisons of test scores would suggest that these private schools may provide better quality than public schools, but how much of this difference is due to selection effects is unclear. Much donor and policy-maker attention has proceeded on the basis that private schools do perform better, and focused on models of public subsidy to expand access, and investment in networks or chains to encourage expansion. In this paper we review the evidence on the effects of private schools on learning, and how that effect translates to public-private partnerships (PPPs). We also study the effects of private school chains. We conduct a systematic review for eligible studies, with transparent search criteria. The search resulted in over 100 studies on low-cost private schools and PPPs, with a large majority being on low-cost private schools. Our meta-analysis shows moderately strong effects from private schooling, although the limited number of experimental studies find much smaller effects than quasi-experimental studies. This advantage, though, is not nearly enough to help most children reach important learning goals. Turning to policy goals, we find that the private school advantage has not translated to public private partnerships, which have shown limited value in improving quality. They can however represent a lower-cost means of increasing access to school. We also find that private school chains perform little better than individual private schools and have little scope for achieving meaningful scale.
Contracting Out Schools at Scale: Evidence from Pakistan, with Abdullah Alam (2022) Education Economics (Open Access)
Can governments contract out school management at scale? In 2016 the Government of Punjab transferred management of over 4,000 failing primary schools to private operators. Schools remained free to students. Private operators received a government subsidy per enrolled student of less than half per-student spending in government schools. This paper evaluates the effects on performance of converted schools. Comparing early converters to later converters, we estimate that enrolment in treated schools increased by over 60 percent, and test scores declined sharply.
Discrimination by Politicians Against Religious Minorities: Experimental Evidence from the UK, with Ukasha Ramli, (2021), Party Politics (Open Access) - LSE British Politics and Policy Blog
Are Labour party politicians anti-Semitic, and are Conservative party politicians Islamophobic? In this correspondence study we measure the responsiveness of elected local representatives in the United Kingdom to requests from putative constituents from minority religious groups. We send short email requests to 10,268 local government representatives from each of the main political parties, from stereotypically Islamic, Jewish, and Christian names. Response rates are six to seven percentage points lower to stereotypically Muslim or Jewish names. The two major political parties both show equal bias towards the two minority group names. Results suggest that the bias in response may be implicit. Bias is lower in more dense and diverse locations.
Accounting for Repetition and Dropout in Contemporaneous Cross-Section Learning Profiles: Evidence from Rwanda (2021), International Journal of Educational Development (Open Access)
How much do children learn in a year of school? Longitudinal data that tracks children over time is scarce in developing countries, and so recent studies estimate learning profiles by comparing the ability of people with different amounts of schooling, at a single point in time. Such estimates of the effect of schooling on learning may be biased upwards by not controlling for repetition and dropout. In this paper I estimate contemporaneous cross-section learning profiles for Rwanda, using data from a nationally representative survey of 3,053 children aged six to eighteen. I show how adjusting this learning profile for the total number of years enrolled in school (accounting for repetition and dropout), using detailed schooling histories, reduces the average amount learnt per year by over 60 percent. The learning profile for Rwanda is not just too flat, but flatter than previous estimates suggest.
Contact and Commitment to Development: Evidence from quasi-random missionary assignments (2021), Kyklos, Working Paper Version, Survey Questionnaire, Data (Discussion: Religion News Service, Marginal Revolution, Times and Seasons)
Public support for global development in rich countries is critical for sustaining effective government and individual action. But the causes of public support are not well understood. Does spending time living in a developing country play a role in generating individual commitment to development? Addressing this question is fraught with selection bias, as individuals are rarely exogenously assigned to spend time in different countries. In this paper I address this question using a natural experiment – the quasi-random assignment of missionaries from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to two-year missions in different world regions. I provide the first causal estimates of the effect of travel to a developing country on attitudes to global development. Data comes from a new survey gathered through mission alumni Facebook groups. Missionaries assigned to low-income and middle-income world regions (Africa, Asia, Latin America, and Caribbean) have similar prior characteristics to those assigned to high-income Europe. Those assigned to Africa self-report greater interest in global development and greater charitable attitudes and behaviours. However, they also express stronger opposition to immigration from poor countries, and are less likely to be involved in political campaigns to address global development. Spending time in lower income countries may lead to greater support for charity but less support for political change.
Long-run effects of teachers in Developing Countries (2020), with Caine Rolleston, Review of Development Economics (Open Access)
How persistent are teacher effects on student outcomes? In this paper we present estimates of teacher effects on long-run student outcomes from two low- and middle- income countries. We first estimate teacher value-added using the Young Lives School Survey data from Ethiopia and Vietnam. We then track students taught by these teachers 2 and 5 years later and use data from the Young Lives Household Surveys to estimate the effects of teacher quality. We find no persistent effect after 2 years, but better mathematics (0.08σ) and reading (0.06σ) test scores after 5 years, from being taught by a 1σ better Grade 5 teacher. We find no persistent effects of good teachers on measures of more “generalized” cognitive ability, aspirations, well-being, or “grit.”
Testing the feasibility of a Value-Added Model of School Quality in a Low Income Country, with Phil Elks (2019), Development Policy Review (Open Access), Ark Working Paper Version - Data (Discussion: Daily Monitor, Uganda)
Value-added models (VAMs) are commonly used in high-income countries for measuring the quality of teachers and schools, on the grounds that they are a fairer reflection of true quality than simple average test scores, as they account for differences in student intake. Not accounting for student's prior test scores can give a misleading impression of school quality. In this article, we adapt the current VAM of secondary school quality to the Ugandan context, and test its robustness. Using official test score data from Uganda, we test the robustness of the model to a range of different empirical specifications, including sensitivity to the inclusion of controls for student socioeconomic status. We find that the model is robust to a variety of different specifications and control variables. The VAM is low cost and has the potential to provide a clearer signal to parents, teachers, schools, and policy-makers about how much learning is actually happening in different schools. This approach could be carried out at low cost in a wide range of low-income countries that have similar testing regimes.
School Management and Public-Private Partnerships in Uganda (2017), Journal of African Economies (Open Access), RISE Working Paper Version, CGD Blog
Can the quality of school management explain differences in student test scores? In this paper, I present the first internationally benchmarked estimates of school management quality in Africa (based on the ‘World Management Survey’). The level and distribution of management quality is similar to that found in other low and middle-income countries (India and Brazil). I combine this data with individual student panel data, and demonstrate that differences in school management quality matter for student value-added—a standard deviation difference in management is associated with a 0.06 standard deviation difference in test scores. Finally, I contribute to understanding the role of the private sector in education in a low-income setting. Contrary to common perception, I find no difference between the quality of school management in government, private or public–private partnership (PPP) schools (despite the higher level of autonomy available to them). An exception is an internationally owned chain of PPP schools, which are as well managed as schools in the UK.
Working Papers
The Economic Returns to Foundational Literacy and Numeracy: Evidence from Indonesia, CGD Working Paper, CGD Blog Post (Discussion: The Independent)
Work in Progress
The Effect of International Travel on Political Support for Foreign Aid, with Theodore Mitchell
Leading school recovery from COVID-19: Experimental evidence on post-pandemic school leadership training, with Todd Pugatch and Ketki Sheth
Where did Free Primary Education Reforms work, and why?, with Justin Sandefur
Low Returns to Low-Cost Private Schools: Experimental Evidence from Delhi, with Justin Sandefur and Dev Patel
Book Chapters
Teacher Labor Markets in Developing Countries, Routledge Handbook of Education Economics (2021), with Todd Pugatch, IZA Discussion Paper Version
"Jobs and the Labor Market" and "Consumption Patterns", in The Emerging Middle Class in Africa, edited by Mthuli Ncube, Charles Leyeka Lufumpa, Routledge, Google Books
Policy Papers
"Toxic Lead Paint Pigment Exports from Rich to Poor Countries", with Rory Todd and Rachel Bonnifield (2025), Center for Global Development Policy Paper 354, Blog
"What Has Worked at Scale? Many cost-effective education programs suffer implementation failures and political resistance when scaled up in government systems. But not all" (2022), with Susannah Hares and Justin Sandefur, in Schooling for All: Feasible Strategies to Achieve Universal Education, edited by Justin Sandefur, Center for Global Development
"The Case for Free Secondary Education: The experience of free primary education shows how free secondary education could work — but it requires more than a stroke of a pen." (2022), with Aisha Ali, in Schooling for All: Feasible Strategies to Achieve Universal Education, edited by Justin Sandefur, Center for Global Development
"How Much Should Governments Spend on Teachers? The effects of both raising teacher pay and reducing class sizes are small; the scope to increase access without reducing quality is big" (2022), with Alexis Le Nestour, in Schooling for All: Feasible Strategies to Achieve Universal Education, edited by Justin Sandefur, Center for Global Development
"What Complementary Policies Are Needed to Improve Outcomes for Girls?" (2022), with Christelle Saintis-Miller, in Girl's Education and Women's Equality, edited by Shelby Carvalho & David K. Evans, Center for Global Development
A review of Uganda’s Universal Secondary Education Public Private Partnership programme (2018), with James O’Donoghue, Jacklyn Makaaru, Polycarp Otieno, and Rita Perakis, Education Partnerships Group
Learning in Lagos: Comparing Student Achievement in Bridge, Public, and Private Schools (2018), with Alina Lipcan and Brian Law, OPM Report (Discussion: The Guardian (Nigeria), BBC World Service, Institute of Economic Affairs)
Beyond Brexit: Four Steps To Make Britain A Global Leader On Trade For Development (2017), with Ian Mitchell and Michael Anderson, CGD Policy Paper
Can education markets work for the poor? (2016), with Masooda Bano, Rebecca Doherty and Shefali Rai, OPM/EDOREN Report
Review of the Literature on Basic Education in Nigeria: Issues of access, quality, equity and impact (2014), with Sara Humphreys, OPM/EDOREN Report
Growth in Indonesia: is it sustainable? (2013) with Mark Henstridge, Gaber Burnik, Mateo Cabello, Federica Chiappe, Sourovi De, Maham Farhat, Maja Jakobsen, OPM Report
Exchange rate options for South Sudan (2012), with Christopher Adam, Unpublished Working Paper (Discussion: Gulf Times)
Smallholder Farm Risk Management in Developing Countries (2012), with Abhijeet Singh, Background Paper for OECD