Ld-linux-armhf.so.3 Download HOT!

However, my vendor provided the libraries, which reference "/lib/ld-linux.so.3". My yocto image only has "/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3". Because of this, when running bitbake, I get Can't install my-recipe-1.0-r0@cortexa9hf_vfp_neon: no package provides ld-linux.so.3(GLIBC_2.4)

Compile the application on such multi-arch system, patch the interp for it (patchelf --set-interpreter /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 /usr/local/bin/openocd) if You cannot. Or call the dynamically linked binary explicitly through the corresponding dynamic linker (/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 /usr/local/bin/openocd). You could do the last by wrappping the command name in a script or alias and move the acutal binary out of the way.

Ld-linux-armhf.so.3 Download

Download 🔥 https://shoxet.com/2y3CGd 🔥

it's trying to call a libc that does not exist. Or better: it's calling a libc that exists but it's not under the name the splunk executable expects.

this one is actually easy to fix. You need to create a symbolic link so the library ld-linux.so.3 also answer as ld-linux-armhf.so.3:

I'm using the arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf target to allow dynamic linking of the libraries on the RPi, but a simple "hello world" binary fails to run with a No such file or directory error, which appears to be because the interpreter for the binary is set to a file that is not on the RPi (/usr/lib/ld.so.1 rather than all other executables' /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3).

Hello, I am doing a little bit of cross compiling but I have a problem with the linux interpreter. I am using the openstlinux-weston distro with the ld-linux-armhf.so.3 but the binaries after coming out of my cross compilation are using ld-linux.so.3. I need a little bit of hints here how to make it proper.

So I just did a apt install qemu-user-static

I then did a cd to the build root. I then tried to execute hello and got the following error.

/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3: No such file or directory

I then chroot .

Are there any directions for setting up a My Cloud build environment on stretch?

This time when I executed the hello program it worked.

the problem is not in the variable. The problem is in missing library, and I cannot guarantee that ubuntu's libs will work on arm Asus RT-AC56U router.

So you need yo find the native ld-........so and link to that either through symlink (/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3) or, if you prefer it that much, varibale

I am trying to use applications compiled for another arm device on my linksys wrt1200 (also arm) without using openwrt imagebuilder and tools, which works for some apps.

but now I am trying to use lantern proxy on my router but I don't know how to compile it static. so it needs" interpreter /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3" which is not available in openwrt installation because it uses musl.

now my question is: if I set the compiler in openwrt image builder to glibc instead musl and use that image to install openwrt, what is the penalty for that?

does it work? is the musl the default and so glibc may be buggy? it is an space issue? or RAM space issue?

@peterleinchen I tried your suggestion and there are no alarm bells there. Though there is one different line. /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 (0xaaebe000) is different to all the others. Is this the way it should be?

root@helped-oyster:~# cp /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 .

root@helped-oyster:~# objcopy -R .note.stapsdt ld-linux-armhf.so.3 ld-linux-armhf.so.3-nostap

root@helped-oyster:~# gdb --args ./ld-linux-armhf.so.3-nostap /bin/true

After all, I assume that the libs on your router are incompatible with what pihole-FTL is compiled for (/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3) as this file is missing. You may succeed when you create a symlink /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 pointing to /lib/ld-linux.so.3.

After all, I assume that the libs on your router are incompatible with what pihole-FTL is compiled for ( /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 ) as this file is missing. You may succeed when you create a symlink /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 pointing to /lib/ld-linux.so.3 . 2351a5e196