Theory of Opposition

Newton discovered the law of gravity, but he did not explain why there is a gravity. Until two hundred years later, Einstein discovered the theory of relativity that include the reason for gravity to be exist. Fortunately for the the law of inverse, the law and the theory behind the law almost were figured out at the same time. The reader do not have to wait for another two hundred years to appreciate the logic behind the law of inverse.

Readers would expect the theory for law of inverse should be very hard to understand due to the law make dead matter smart: able to fight against gravity purposely. Also the law of inverse was discovered so later: 100 year after the theory of relativity. Actually, the logic behind the novel law was very simple, but it is very clever design by the nature. We Homo sapiens just not very good at figuring out something tricky. Once the mystery is resolved, the learning part is very easy. Anyone with high school level physics should not have any problem to understanding the theory behind the law of inverse.

There are two parts for the theory of the inverse law:

Theory of Opposition l: Liang Force

Theory of opposition ll: The logic for Liang Force.

Fig. 25a shows any shape of spinning top could be formed by stacking different size of spinning disks in certain sequential order, so most simple form of spinning top should be made of only one single disc rather than multiple discs. To make spinning top physics easier to understand, a disc shape spinning top in Fig. 25b is used for analyzing the force involved in spinning top physics.

Fig. 25c is a disc spinning top, and spinning action would create many pairs of centrifugal force. One pairs means two centrifugal force co-axially at an opposite directions from each other, which mean the force cancel each other out. Therefore, the net force left is always equal to zero for each pairs. The surface of spinning disc is orthogonal to the spinning axis, which is also orthogonal to all the centrifugal force. Therefore surface of spinning disc is always co-planing with all the centrifugal forces created by spinning disc. The figure shows one blue pairs is co-planing with one blue pairs. When spinning top is play at upright position in Fig. 25d, spinning axis is vertically to viewers. all the centrifugal forces and surface of spinning disk have to be at horizontally due to orthogonal relationship with vertical spinning axis. If spinning top play at a tilting position in Fig. 25e or Fig. 25f, spinning axis is no longer vertical. The direction of centrifugal force could not be horizontal neither due to orthogonal relationship with spinning axis. The direction of orthogonal centrifugal force has no effect on amount of net centrifugal forces, which is always equal to zero. The direction of spinning axis determine the direction of orthogonal centrifugal force, but it does change the net zero centrifugal force. The relationship between surface of spinning disc and all centrifugal force is always co-planing.

The major force player in spinning top physics is the centrifugal force. To figure out who is responsible for self rising, centrifugal force would be the first suspect to be checked. In Fig. 26a, the spinning top is tilting to the left, the direction of centrifugal force are orthogonal to the spinning axis. Due to each centrifugal force in the pairs is opposite to each other, the net force left is zero. Therefor the zero centrifugal force is unable to help top move to upright position in Fig. 26b. In Fig. 26c, the spinning top is tilting toward right. No net force left to make tilting spinning to move to upright direction In Fig. 26b. Therefore, no expert wants to use centrifugal force to explain self rising phenomenon of a spinning top. Centrifugal force only good for explaining the slow falling of spinning top or delaying the change from upright Fig. 26b to a tilting position Fig. 26c or Fig. 26a.

self rising phenomenon has been a big puzzle for very long time throughout our science history; many hypothetical ideas and complicated calculations have been attempted, but none of them works well. The most accepted hypothetical idea is friction force, but nobody could explain logically how friction does the job and there is not any experimental report to support the friction explanation. Some experts is still trying to find new answer for the question because they do not think we have the correct one yet ，anyhow the question was fail to label as unexplained or science mystery . failing to address the question properly has been resulting a negative effect on our science because it really delay or almost prevent us from finding the correct spinning top physics.

About 10 years ago, author feel the frictions explanation is not logic enough to interpret the self rising, the strong curiosity keep him to think about a better idea to solve the problem.. Not sure how many weeks later, one fantasy idea pops up. How about make one pair of centrifugal force horizontally rather than orthogonal to spinning axis as shown in Fig. 26d or Fig. 26f. Even Though this idea breaks the orthogonal rule (or maybe law) between spinning axis and centrifugal force, it works perfectly to explain self rising phenomenon.. The obvious advantage for horizontally centrifugal force (Liang Force) is not cancelling each other out to zero. As mentioned earlier, One pair of Orthogonal centrifugal force always cancel each other out to zero because they are at opposite in direction co-axially. No net force left for helping self rising work. If spinning top plays at tilting position, horizontal centrifugal forces (Liang Force) would never co-axially to each other, so there could be some kind of force left responsible the work of self rising. If spinning top tilting toward right, the Liang force is good for turn top toward left in Fig. 26f; when spinning top tilting toward left, Liang force favor toward right Fig. 26d.

Liang force is a pair of horizontal centrifugal force composed of Liang force H and Liang force L. Liang force H is always higher than Liang force L(low) in attitude shown as in Fig. 27a or Fig. 27b; the relationship between Liang force H and Liang force L is always are always parallel with each other at opposite direction, but never coaxial. Due to attitude difference between Liang force H & Liang force L, Liang force is always able to create a torque force or Liang torque good for turning tilting spinning top to less & less tiling position until reach upright direction. Torque circle in Fig. 27a is larger the torque circle in Fig. 27b due top in Fig. 27a is more tilting than top in Fig. 27b. More tilting means more attitude difference in Liang force, and the bigger torque circle would be. Liang force or Liang torque would become zero once spinning top reaching to upright position because Liang force H and Liang force L would be equal in attitude. It means Liang force H & Liang force L cancel each other out unable to create Liang torque or the torque become zero at upright position During self rising, the difference between Liang force H and Liang force L is always reduce until become zero; at the same time, torque circle become a dot.

Liang force or horizontal centrifugal force looks like breaking Orthogonal rule or law between spinning axis and centrifugal force. Actually it did not, the problem is we did not apply the the rule or law correctly. Theory of opposition II would explain how Liang force was created without break the orthogonal rule.

The law of inverse was first found from playing a simple spinning top. The law should work in other science fields also, waiting to be discovered in the near future. The law should be known to our science 200 or 300 years ago, at least Albert Einstein was deserved to play with the law. The reason for the big delay this discovery is because the law of inverse was camouflaged behind the gyroscopic physics. The science experts were trapped within the known laws of physics unable to figure out problem from outside of known science. The best place to find the law is from the fantasy land where has no restriction for any idea. Once the fantasy is logic enough and able to reproduce in reality; it is time for our science accept the fantasy as a science.

The law of inverse is a dolphin right now. It does not qualified as fantasy because it could be duplicated the reaity; our science is not ready to accept the law neither because it is still too fantasy to be in reality. The only place for the law of inverse to go is the Scien-Fan

For now the readers should make their decision it is fantasy or science. The below figures and video links display the natural observation from playing spinning top. Our science has been failed to explain the observation for more than two hundred years. It is time for law of inverse to interpreted the all the observation from spinning with capability of prediction.

****+++

For now, The law of inverse is depending on the readers to make the category decision: fantasy or science. The figures and video links in below provide two kind of observations for illustrating the law of inverse. The figures and video in next page provides solid experimental support for the exists of inverse law.

Could spinning top work with the law of inverse for saving its energy ? It means playing of spinning top would last much longer if it is able to take advantage of the law. The immediate answer for this question is absolutely no from our science point of view because Spinning top is not a living thing and does not have any kind of a balancing system. Spinning top is just a lifeless solid body without balancing system which require gravity sensor, controller, or electricity.

However, there are many different observation suggest spinning top is secretly taking advantage of inverse law. Our universe is full of mystery and suppressed. Please continue to find out spinning top is smarter than us in term of balancing.

Google Sites

Report abuse