To hire property lawyers in Lahore from Law Firm in Lahore Pakistan for variety of cases you may contact Jamila Law Associates. Even documents alleged created no right in favor of the petitioner. Under the law, immovable property having value more than Rs.100/- cannot be transferred without duly registration of an instrument. In family settlement through property lawyers in Lahore from Law Firm in Lahore Pakistan, it can settle the immovable property between the parties, but no one can permanently transfer his share of property in favor of another shareholder. Our law firm in Lahore & Law firms in Lahore is best for services of all kind of case. Our law firms in Lahore Pakistan will provide you the every kind of lawyer for legal services.
Further held, possession of each co-share is deemed to be the possession of each co-share is deemed to be the possession of every co-share. In the instant matter when parties to suit were legal heirs to the deceased owner. Therefore, there was no question of limitation in filing suit. Petitioner had failed to point out any misreading or non-reading and jurisdictional defect in impugned judgment/decree passed by both the Courts below.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed settlement through property lawyers in Lahore from Law Firm in Lahore Pakistan. Incorporation in the company petitioners' Revenue Record changed it declined the name because unless they are executed a formed sale deed, no mutation could be sanctioned. The writ petition in High Court for relief, whether petitioner was governed by provisions of the Companies Ordinance and was there a conflict between the Companies Ordinance and Land Revenue Act, and was petitioner required to get a formal sale deed executed to incorporate change in its name in revenue record or not settlement through property lawyers in Lahore from Law Firm in Lahore Pakistan.
The company had not in any manner prayed settlement through property lawyers in Lahore from Law Firm in Lahore Pakistan for remission qua arrears of land revenue, nor was it a case of respondents that it had defaulted in that context, therefore, said provision of S. 114, Land Revenue Act was inapplicable to the instant dispute.
The petitioner company had not ventured or undertaken any exercise, violating the exceptions in Section 17(2) of the Registration Act. No transfer of immovable property had taken place, the identity of the petitioner was the same. Therefore, it fell within the exception to say S. 17. AS such company was not required to get, any sale-deed registered. Writ petition allowed. Execution of gift. Question of Appreciation of facts/law. A civil appeal in Supreme Court. Execution of said gift deed and agreement to sell was to the proved by the appellant being beneficiary, and to substantiate Lis claim, which was a hand on the alleged gift and sale would be futile exercise to examine as to whether the said gift was or registered or not for the simple reason that it could not prove its execution. However, there was no Cavil with the proportion that gift was compulsory registerable.
Without getting it registered settlement through property lawyers in Lahore from Law Firm in Lahore Pakistan, the titles of the property in question could not have been conferred upon. It could not reverse impugned determination if Appellate Court upheld by High Court without any cogent reasoning on the lawful justification that lasted in the instant case. Our Lawyer in Lahore Pakistan is here for services of all kind of case.