Embedded Files
Benchmark compilation. Please use the dropdown on Benchmarks to select your benchmark.
Date: Oct 2018
Date: Oct 2018
Benchmark for:
- xgboost speed
- LightGBM speed
To compare:
- Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) and Uniform Memory Access (UMA)
- Model (xgboost exact, approx, hist, LightGBM)
Dataset used:
- Bosch with less than 95% sparse features
Server used:
- Dual Xeon Gold 6154 (36 cores / 72 threads, 3.7/3.7 GHz)
Benchmark for:
- xgboost speed
- LightGBM speed
To compare:
- Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) and Uniform Memory Access (UMA)
Dataset used:
- Feature Interaction Higgs (11M x 406) => 82GB RAM required for benchmarking
Server used:
- Dual Xeon Gold 6130 (32 cores / 64 threads, 3.7/2.8 GHz)
Date: May 2018
Date: May 2018
Benchmark for:
- xgboost speed
- LightGBM speed
To compare:
- gcc 5.4, gcc 8.1, and Intel Compilers 2018.2.199 (from Intel Parallel Studio XE 2018 Update 2)
Dataset used:
- Feature Interaction Higgs (11M x 406) => 82GB RAM required for benchmarking
Server used:
- Dual Xeon Gold 6130 (32 cores / 64 threads, 3.7/2.8 GHz)
Date: May 2018
Date: May 2018
Benchmark for:
- xgboost speed
- LightGBM speed
To compare:
- Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) and Windows
Dataset used:
- Feature Interaction Higgs (11M x 406) => 82GB RAM required for benchmarking
Server used:
- Dual Xeon Gold 6130 (32 cores / 64 threads, 3.7/2.8 GHz)
Date: May 2017
Date: May 2017
Benchmark for:
- xgboost
- LightGBM
To compare:
- Speed and accuracy of models
Datasets used:
- Bosch (1M x 1K)
- Higgs (10M x 29)
- Reputation (2M x 25K)
Servers used:
- Intel Core i7-7700K (4 cores / 8 threads, 4.5/4.4 GHz)
- Dual Xeon E5-2670v2 (20 cores / 40 threads, 3.3/2.7 GHz)
Date: Feb 2017
Date: Feb 2017
Benchmark for:
- xgboost
- LightGBM
To compare:
- Speed and accuracy of models
Datasets used:
- Bosch (1M x 1K)
- Higgs (10M x 29)
- Reputation (2M x 25K)
Servers used:
- Intel Core i7-7700K (4 cores / 8 threads, 4.5/4.4 GHz)
- Dual Xeon E5-2670v2 (20 cores / 40 threads, 3.3/2.7 GHz)
Google Sites
Report abuse