Embedded Files
CRG-20
CRG-20
Max Speed: 15 b/s (blocks per second)
Avg Seating: 16
LC+: YES
Supported Fuel: Coal, Charcoal
Airport Support Ratio: 8/10 chance
SVAA Saftey Rating: 9/10
LC3
LC3
Max Speed: unmesured b/s (blocks per second)
Avg Seating: N/A
LC+: NO
Supported Fuel: Charcoal
Airport Support Ratio: 1/10 chance
SVAA Saftey Rating: 3/10
Summery
Summery
CRG-20 has better specs than the LC3.
The LC3 has been observed to have more issues (and isn't protected under LC+ since 2024) compared to ANY other aircraft.
CRG-20 has a higher safety rating than the LC3 from the SVAA. The LC3 has had multiple mechanical issues while flying with QuickStar.
The LC3 also preforms poorly in aerodynamics. Has been seen to have a harder time finding an airport that still takes them, and such.
The CRG-20 is widely accepted at most international and regional airports all over SVMC. While the LC3 is only accepted between FRK and AUS.
In addition, the LC3 no longer has LC+ support since 2024. Meaning no official support for the aircraft. The aircraft is harder to maintain and is a fuel hog.
The CRG-10 was primarily designed to be a better option than the LC3, and the CRG-20 overtook that too.
To sum this completely up: The LC3 is a failure of an aircraft, served its purpose as a short haul at the time, but brings multiple safety issues.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse