First Learning Outcome
RDA 1
RDA 1
Week 1
The first module of the course establishes the chronological and theoretical framework for understanding the trajectory of humanity. It challenges the student to move beyond a static view of history as a collection of dates and instead view it as a dynamic process of cause and effect that shapes the present.
Key Question: Why go into the past? Why is history important?
The semester commences with an existential justification for the discipline itself. The fundamental premise is that we must "understand the past to understand the present". History is not a dead subject; it is, in the words of historians like Patrick Allitt, a "living presence" that infuses every aspect of contemporary existence.
Analysis of Patrick Allitt’s Argumentation
In his lecture "Why History Matters," Patrick Allitt dismantles the common student perception that history is merely a "jumble of names and dates." He argues that history is indispensable for three primary reasons, which can be categorized as Healing, Optimizing, and Transforming (H.O.T.).
History provides the context necessary to understand current traumas and conflicts. A society needs to understand the historical roots of its problems (whether it be the legacy of slavery in the United States or the sectarian violence in the Middle East) to address them effectively.
History is a repository of data on human behavior. By analyzing past successes and failures, leaders and citizens can optimize their decision-making. Understanding the economic consequences of protectionist tariffs in the 1930s, for example, is crucial for evaluating modern trade wars.
History transforms our understanding of ourselves. It liberates us from the "provincialism of the present" the mistaken belief that our current way of life is the only way or the "natural" way. This realization empowers individuals to envision different futures.
Why history matters ?
History matters because it is the only instrument we have for navigating the complexity of the present. As Allitt argues, we are "never far from where we were". The political institutions we inhabit, the languages we speak, and the technologies we use are not spontaneous creations but legacies. Ignorance of history leaves one vulnerable to manipulation by political actors who use distorted versions of the past to justify current agendas. Therefore, historical literacy is a prerequisite for active and informed citizenship.
Week 2
"Once Upon a Time" by E.H. Gombrich The assigned reading from A Little History of the World introduces a profound metaphor for historical time. Gombrich asks the reader to imagine standing between two mirrors, seeing their reflection multiplied into an infinite tunnel of "past" selves. This "abyss of time" can be dizzying, but it illustrates the continuity of human experience.
Gombrich compares history to a burning scrap of paper dropped into a deep well. As it falls, it illuminates the walls of the well, revealing the immediate past clearly. However, as it descends further, the light dims, and we can only glimpse the shadows of "prehistory" the time before written records.
The text distinguishes between these two eras. Prehistory is the domain of the archaeologist, reconstructed from fossils (like the Heidelberg jaw) and tools. History begins with the written word, allowing us to hear the voices of the past directly. This transition is crucial because it marks the beginning of "recorded memory".
The course identifies several pivotal moment or Revolutions that fundamentally altered the human condition. The term "revolution" is used not to denote a single violent event, but a radical, irreversible structural change in society.
This was the transition from the Paleolithic hunter-gatherer lifestyle to the Neolithic settled farming existence.
It fundamentally changed the relationship between humans and the environment. Instead of adapting to nature, humans began to shape nature (domestication).
It enabled food surpluses, which supported higher population densities. This surplus was the economic foundation for all subsequent civilization, allowing for the division of labor (specialization) but also introducing social stratification, disease from livestock, and the concept of "work" as a distinct activity from "living".
The coalescence of agricultural communities into cities (Mesopotamia, Egypt, Indus, China).
It created the state. For the first time, people lived in large, anonymous societies governed by centralized laws rather than kinship ties.
It led to the invention of writing (for accounting and law), the rise of bureaucracy, organized religion, and the military. It established the "City" as the center of power and the "countryside" as the periphery, a dynamic that persists today.
A Reassessment The period from the 5th to the 15th centuries is often pejoratively termed the "Dark Ages" in Western historiography. However, the course material prompts a re-evaluation of this Eurocentric view.
Why considered a "Dark Age"?
The collapse of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE led to the fragmentation of political power in Europe, a decline in urban populations, and the loss of centralized infrastructure (roads, aqueducts). Literacy rates in Europe plummeted, and the Church became the sole custodian of knowledge.
The Global Reality
While Europe fragmented, other civilizations flourished.
From Baghdad to Cordoba, Islamic scholars made groundbreaking advances in algebra, medicine (Avicenna), optics, and philosophy, preserving and expanding upon Aristotle and Plato while Europe had largely lost them.
This network was the nervous system of the medieval world. It was not just a trade route for silk; it was a vector for Interconnectedness.
What was the primary purpose? To facilitate the exchange of high-value, low-weight luxury goods (silk, spices, porcelain) across the vast distances of Eurasia.
Why was silk significant? Silk was a monopoly of China, a currency, a status symbol, and a textile that was light, durable, and comfortable, making it the ideal trade good.
What other exchanges occurred? The Silk Road facilitated the transmission of ideas (Buddhism from India to China, Islam to Central Asia), technologies (paper-making, gunpowder, the compass), and pathogens (the Black Death), all of which reshaped world history more profoundly than the trade goods themselves
The narrative shifts back to Europe with the Renaissance and the Scientific Revolution (16th–17th centuries). This period marked a shift from a "religiously dominated worldview" to one based on "empirical observation" (Copernicus, Galileo). This intellectual shift birthed the Enlightenment (18th Century), which applied scientific reason to human society, challenging the "Divine Right of Kings" and proposing radical ideas like natural rights and the social contract.
Created a republic based on liberal democracy, though contradicted by the institution of slavery.
A radical attempt to completely reconstruct society based on "Reason," overthrowing the monarchy and the Church. It gave birth to the modern concept of the "Nation-State" and "Citizenship".
The only successful slave revolt in history, leading to the first independent black republic. It challenged the universality of Enlightenment claims: did "liberty" apply to all men, or only white men?.
This revolution fundamentally altered how humans lived. By shifting production from the home (cottage industry) to the factory, and energy from muscle/wind to steam/coal, it unleashed unprecedented economic growth but also created the modern "working class," massive urbanization, and environmental degradation. It cemented European global dominance (Imperialism) by providing the technological tools (steamboats, machine guns) for conquest.
The "Final Exam" preparation involves connecting these historical threads to modern issues.
The legacy of the Urban/State Revolution (centralization of power) and the Age of Exploration (colonization) raises the question of modern empire. While formal colonies are largely gone, the dominance of Western financial institutions (IMF, World Bank), military alliances (NATO), and cultural exports suggests a form of "informal empire." The U.S. intervention in Venezuela (discussed in RdA 3) serves as a prime example of this imperial prerogative.
The medieval Crusades established a narrative of "Clash of Civilizations" (Christianity vs. Islam) that persists in modern rhetoric. The current conflicts in the Middle East or sectarian violence in India are often framed by participants using historical grievances dating back centuries, proving Allitt's point that history is a "living presence".