As strong as your selection policy might be, having a reconsideration policy will help when any material currently in your collection is called into question for appropriateness. Procedures should in place to accept, evaluate, and respond to any challenges to library material. These kinds of challenges are for the Teacher Librarian to handle but it helps if everyone is familiar with their school or district's reconsideration policy.
Below are some resources that may help.
The materials provided by your library are selected in accordance with the Library's Collection Development Policy to meet the teaching, research, and service needs of your school. It is the responsibility of the Library to ensure that different points of view are represented in the materials and resources provided in the Library collections.
The Library adheres to the principles of intellectual freedom outlined in the Library Bill of Rights of the American Library Association and further explicated in the Freedom to Read Statement, the Freedom to View Statement, and the Intellectual Freedom Principles for Academic Libraries. Pursuant to these, the Library will not automatically withdraw duly selected materials from the library collections in response to a request from an individual or group.
Formal Reconsideration
https://www.ala.org/tools/challengesupport/selectionpolicytoolkit/formalreconsideration
ALA Sample Reconsiderations Form
https://www.ala.org/tools/challengesupport/selectionpolicytoolkit/sampleforms
Persons who are concerned about the appropriateness of library resources or are unsatisfied with the response from an informal discussion about a title may choose to make a formal request for reconsideration of the work in question. A formal reconsideration request is a written document that is usually reviewed by an assigned library staff member or committee. In order to provide a standard method for receiving patron input, every library should have a written process for handling formal complaints as part of the reconsideration policy. This will serve as a guideline when reviewing, evaluating, and processing formal reconsideration requests. Adding timeline requirements to the reconsideration process ensures that complainants concerns will be addressed in a timely fashion. Timelines should be determined based on the needs of your institution.
Procedures for Handling Formal Complaints
Example: School Library Procedures for Handling Formal Complaints
The following procedures should be followed if, after discussing the questioned resource, no resolution is made.
The complainant should be referred to the principal.
A concerned citizen who is dissatisfied with earlier informal discussions will be offered a packet of materials which includes the library’s mission statement, selection policy, request for reconsideration of instructional resources form, and the Library Bill of Rights.
The complainant is required to complete and submit the reconsideration form to the principal within ten business days.
If a completed reconsideration form is not submitted within ten business days, the matter is considered closed.
Upon receipt of the form, the principal should notify and provide a copy of the reconsideration form with the following individuals:
Superintendent
School Library Advisory Committee/Reconsideration Committee
School librarian
School library department director
The work in question will remain on library shelves and in circulation until a formal decision is made.
The Reconsideration Committee will be appointed by the principal and consist of a teacher, a building level administrator, a school librarian, a reading specialist or language arts teacher, and a member of the community. Makeup of the committee varies depending on the school district.
The school librarian will secure copies of the resource for the committee to review.
The school librarian will provide the reviewing committee with a short formal Intellectual Freedom training that explains a packet of materials, which includes the library’s mission statement, selection policy, the Library Bill of Rights, the completed reconsideration form, reviews of the resource being reconsidered, and a list of awards or honors, if any. This packet should be created with assistance from the state department of public instruction and the American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom.
Through interlibrary loan or other means, the school librarian will obtain copies of the material in question for review by the Reconsideration Committee.
The Reconsideration Committee (which should include the school librarian) should schedule a formal reconsideration meeting within 10 school days after the principal receives the written request for reconsideration. The principal should notify the superintendent and the school library department director as to this schedule.
The school level Reconsideration Committee should follow the procedures listed below:
At the initial meeting, the principal and committee will review reconsideration committee guidelines and procedures. A school administrator should fully participate in the reconsideration process.
A member of the committee should keep minutes.
All committee members should fully review the resource (read or view the entire work) before voting.
The committee reserves the right to use outside expertise if necessary to help in its decision-making process.
The complainant may make an initial verbal presentation about the resource under reconsideration or may choose to share the written form. The complainant is asked to provide sources for quotes used during this presentation.
The complainant may not participate in or observe the committee’s deliberations unless invited to do so by the committee. The committee chair may choose to give committee members time to ask questions.
During the initial or subsequent meetings, the committee will make its decision determined by the simple majority to retain, move the resources to a different level, or remove the resource. This will be a secret ballot vote.
The committee's written decision (including a minority report if needed) shall be presented to the complainant, the superintendent of schools, and the school library department director within five school days after the decision is made.
If the complainant is not satisfied with the decision at the school level, a written appeal can be made within 10 school days to a system-level Educational Resource Reconsideration Committee. This request should be delivered to the superintendent of schools.
The District-Level Reconsideration Committee will consider any appeals from the school level. The committee will be appointed by the Superintendent or his/her designee as follows:
Director of school library services
Director of elementary, middle, or secondary education, as appropriate
Curriculum coordinator specializing in reading from the appropriate level
District-level library services staff
School librarian from the appropriate level
Other district-level instructional directors
A student from the level in which the challenged material resides (middle or high school level only)
The organization of the District-Level Reconsideration Committee will be as follows:
Policy, committee guidelines, and procedures should be reviewed at each meeting.
The chairperson will be the school library coordinator (or other appropriate central office supervisor of school libraries). The secretary of the committee will be elected at each meeting.
The chairperson will be the spokesperson for the committee at all meetings and before the Board of Education when decisions are made.
The secretary will record the minutes and decisions of the meetings.
These should be filed with the chairperson, who will communicate decisions in writing to the superintendent. Meetings will be called at the discretion of the chairperson or when an appeal is requested by a complainant.
The procedures for the District-Level Reconsideration Committee will be as follows:
The chairperson will call the meeting within 10 school days after the written appeal is filed with the superintendent.
The committee shall read and/or examine the challenged resource, read the written reconsideration form, and read copies of the professionally prepared reviews and list of awards provided by the school librarian on the committee. The chairperson should forward these materials to the committee members at least three days prior to the meeting. The procedures for these meeting are the same as those for the school-level meeting.
The procedures for an appeal to the Board of Education will be as follows:
An appeal of the decision made by the District-Level Reconsideration Committee must be made in writing to the superintendent within 10 days of the system-level committee decision.
A decision on the complaint will be made at the next regular meeting or special meeting within 30 days of the written request to the superintendent.
The board reserves the right to use outside expertise if necessary to help in its decision making.
The chairperson for the District-Level Reconsideration Committee will present the committee's decision to the board.
The complainant or designee will present the petitioner’s position.
The board decision will be final, and the superintendent will implement the decision.
Decisions on reconsidered materials will stand for five years before new requests for reconsideration of those items will be entertained.
(from the American Library Association's Formal Reconsideration webpage)
(from the American Library Association's Sample Reconsideration Form webpage)
Recommended Guidelines for the Reconsideration Committee (Garnar & Magi, 2021)
Committee members' personal beliefs are to be set aside and challenged works are to be evaluated by the objective standards outlined in your school's Selection Policy.
As the freedom to read is essential to democracy, committee members must base their decisions on these broad principles rather than on defense of individual materials.
Challenged works are to be read in full, as well as available reviews and professional recommendations.
The Library's policies and procedures will be reviewed, including but not necessarily limited to, the Selection Policy.
The committee will check for general acceptance of the work by consulting standard evaluation aids and selection policies.
Challenged materials will not be removed from the collection while under reconsideration.
The work will be evaluated as a whole, and excerpts, passages, or parts should not be pulled out of context. Overall values and faults will be weighed against each other and the opinions based on the material as a whole.
Committee evaluation meeting(s) will be closed, with final report to the Superintendent, and written final decision to the complainant, which is to be the responsibility of the designated agent.
The committee’s recommendation is to be an objective evaluation of the material within the scope of the library’s collection policy.
Note. Adapted from Intellectual Freedom Manual (10th ed.), by Martin Garnar and Trina Magi. Copyright 2021 by ALA Editions.