Above are two photos of a 1917 edition of the Constitution & Bylaws of Tau Beta Pi. It is not certain when this document arrived at K-State, but it was most likely during the earliest efforts to start a Tau Beta Pi chapter at Manhattan. The booklet is archived in the Tau Beta Pi vertical files at K-State Special Collections in Hale library.
Between 1909 and 1921, much correspondence was exchanged regarding the formation of a Tau Beta Pi chapter at Kansas State Agricultural College (KSAC). Multiple factors contributed to unfruitful efforts including non-compliant KSAC entrance requirements, low student awareness of Tau Beta Pi, wavering faculty support for the same, and the chartering of the Epsilon Chapter of Sigma Tau in May 1912. At times, support for a chapter was high, but other factors were prohibitory, and vice versa. Ultimately, the right combination of factors was not present during these early days.
Myron Ralph Bowerman (MI-A 1909), Instructor in the Mechanical Arts Dept., KSAC
Robert Clayton Matthews (IL-A 1902), 1st Secretary-Treasurer of Tau Beta Pi
Herbert John Kuelling (WI-A 1908), Office of the County Highway Commissioner, Milwaukee, WI
Walter Scott Gearhart (MO-A 1907), State Highway Engineer of Kansas, KSAC
Lowell Edwin Conrad, Professor of Civil Engineering, KSAC
Albert C. Bux, Mechanical Arts student, KSAC
Charles Forrest Zeigler, civil engineering student, KSAC
Henry Harold Higbie (NY-A 1904), President of Tau Beta Pi
Walter T. Rolfe, architectural engineering student, KSAC
Though its installation date did not arrive until 1974, the Kansas Gamma origin story begins much earlier. The story begins in 1909, with a handwritten letter sent by a member of the faculty at Kansas State to Robert "Red" Clayton Matthews (IL-A 1902), who was then Secretary of the Tau Beta Pi Association at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville. This is the earliest record of its kind disclosing a local desire to start a Tau Beta Pi chapter in Manhattan.
In 1909, Myron Ralph Bowerman (MI-A 1904) was an Instructor in Machine Design for the Department of Applied Mechanics and Machine Design at Kansas State Agricultural College or "KSAC" (now Kansas State University). Bowerman was a member of the Class of 1904 at Michigan State University in East Lansing, Michigan, which is where his Tau Beta Pi journey began. He surely had no idea, back then, that Kansas Gamma would hold his letters in such historical significance today. Nonetheless, it was Bowerman who started the conversation with this first letter.
Dear Sir: I should like to see a chapter of Tau Beta Pi established at this school and want to know the proper way of going about to apply for one. I think the institution is worthy. I am teaching mechanical engineering there. Very truly yours, M. R. Bowerman, Alpha of Mich. '09
One thing that this letter makes very clear is just how fast the United States Post Office used to deliver mail. If Bowerman actually mailed his second letter on January 28th in Manhattan, then it is most impressive that the national office stamped it as being received not more than one day later in Knoxville.Â
Was that the true timeline? There is no way of knowing without seeing a postmark, but it is certain that Bowerman was not shy about getting down to business. Having received no response from Tau Beta Pi Headquarters after his first letter, he mailed one more at the end of January 1910.
I should like to know what procedure would be followed to establish a chapter of Tau Beta Pi at this college. I think the engineering course is strong enough to warrant a chapter. I am teaching mechanical engineering here and am much interested in some such a project. Hoping to hear from you in this regard, I am, very truly yours, M. R. Bowerman, Alpha of Mich. '09
It is this image of Matthews' first letter to K-State in which one can see how badly time and moisture deteriorated the oldest generation of the Kansas Gamma correspondence files at HQ. In his letter, Matthews provides Bowerman with the main requisites for starting a chapter.
Dear Brother: Your letters of Dec. 27th and Jan. 8th are at hand. I should have answered the first, but was away during the holidays, and have since been unusually busy with college work.
I know almost nothing regarding your school and can give no idea whether a petition would be favorably received or not. We have of late rather held to the following prescriptions in the case of new chapters: At least fourteen Carnegie entrance units must be required by the college. The senior and junior classes must have not less than thirty-six members each, in order that a minimum of nine men from each class be assured. If these conditions can be met there, I shall be glad to consider the matter further, and to receive fuller information upon it. With kindest regards, I am, Very fraternally, Secretary.
One may wonder: What happened to Bowerman? Hold your horses; he'll be back. This story follows the timeline of correspondence records at HQ, so expect some jumping around.Â
The next entry in the timeline is a letter from Herbert John Kuelling (WI-A 1908), of the Office of the County Highway Commissioner, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He tells Matthews of a recent visit to KSAC during which he discovered a strong sentiment amongst the students, in favor of founding a Tau Beta Pi chapter. He tells of two Tau Bates on the faculty at KSAC but makes no mention of Bowerman for reasons unknown.
Dear Brother: About a month ago I was in Manhattan Kansas where the Agricultural College of that state is situated. At this school there is a standard Engineering Department of about five hundred students, and they have no Tau Beta Pi chapter but are very anxious to get one started.
I spent considerable time with the Dean talking the matter over and also in inspecting the school and I am convinced that some steps should be taken to have a chapter established. The Dean is perfectly willing to do all he can to aid though he is not a brother himself.
The only Brothers I could locate out there were Brother Gearhart, who is the State Highway Engineer of Kansas and located at Manhattan, and his assistant Mr. Walker. They are both willing to undertake the task of starting the Chapter and think they can get help from some of the Brothers in Kansas City.
I promised them I would get them in touch with the right officials so I would be very much oblidged if you would write to them telling them the necessary steps for them to take. Brother Gearhart will be glad to attend to it. Fraternally yours, H. J. Kuelling, Alpha of Wis. '08
Having heard now from two separate sources, Bowerman and Kuelling, that students and faculty at K-State would like to start a Tau Beta Pi chapter, R. C. Matthews sends an informational sheet to Walter Scott Gearhart (MO-A 1907), State Engineer, with his letter. Matthews talks of how he is somewhat of an expansionist, and he would be glad to see a chapter at Manhattan.
Dear Brother: At the request of Brother Herbert John Kuelling of Milwaukee, I am sending you an information sheet covering the points necessary for consideration in establishing a chapter of Tau Beta Pi. I have had several similar requests lately, and accordingly made a number of carbons of this, and I know you will pardon my sending one of them to you.
Brother Kuelling said you and Brother Walker seemed to be in favor of a chapter at Manhattan; and that the authorities there would like to have something done. I am somewhat of an expansionist myself, feeling that we ought to establish chapters wherever and whenever conditions warrant. If you have any doubts as to the desirability of putting a chapter in at Manhattan, please do not hesitate to say so. We have a great plenty now to get along satisfactorily, and are not seeking new ones very vigorously. If things seem right to you, I shall be glad to do whatever I am able to push matters along.
To actually set the ball rolling, I should determine the men eligible, and call them together someday and explain the aims and objects of Tau Beta Pi in so far as seems advisable. If they seemed to wish to push the thing along, then the information on the enclosed sheet could be made known, and the necessary steps taken. I do not think it wise to try-to establish a chapter unless the students want it. Hoping to hear from you at an early date, I am, very fraternally, Secretary.Â
Please have a college catalog sent to me.
Walter Gearhart writes Matthews back and advises that he and another Tau Bate at KSAC don't do any teaching, but they would like to see a chapter established and they will take on the matter and approach the students and faculty to begin working towards a chapter.
Dear Sir: Your favor of the 26th inst. and the enclosed letter and constitution and bylaws of the Tau Beta Pi received for which kindly accept my thanks.
Neither Mr. Walker or myself do any teaching work but we are interested in having a Chapter established here and will take this matter up with the students and faculty at once and write you later.
In compliance with your request, I am sending you College catalogue under separate cover.
Thanking you for your courtesy in this matter, I am, very truly yours, W.S. Gearhart, State Engineer
Prof. Lowell E. Conrad writes Matthews on February 1st, 1912, reporting that there is considerable interest on the KSAC campus in starting a chapter of Tau Beta Pi and that Dean McCormick has suggested for Conrad to write the Association regarding the best method of determining eligibility. Conrad discusses the grading metrics employed by KSAC at the time, and proposes a method of grade averaging. He requests information about membership dues and asks Matthews if he knows of any condition which cause difficulty in establishing a chapter at Manhattan.
Dear Sir: During the past few months, considerable interest has been aroused in this institution regarding the establishing of a Chapter of Tau Beta Pi. I am writing you at the suggestion of Dean E.B. McCormick for information regarding the best method of determining eligibility in this institution. Our markings consist of five letters, E (Excellent), G (Good), P (Passed), C (Condition), and F ( Failure). As a general thing I believe that the teachers consider a grade of E equivalent to a numerical grade of from 90 to 100, G from 80 to 89, P from 70 to 79, C 60 to 69, and F below 60. In your opinion would it be permissible to average grades in this case by calling all E's 95, G's 85, P's 75, C's 65 and F's 50. Of course the numerical value of an F is indeterminate, but I think we are safe in saying that students eligible to Tau Beta Pi will have very few F's on their record. If you consider that the method of determining eligibility above described would not be permissible, will you please state what, in your opinion, would be the best method of determining it.
Also, will you please state the present amount of dues for both juniors and seniors.
Do you know of any reason likely to make it difficult for this institution to obtain a charter for a Chapter of Tau Beta Pi? We have about 300 engineering students here in Civil, Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering.
Please accept my thanks in advance for your attention to this matter. Respectfully, L.E. Conrad
Conrad's proposed method of grade averaging was deemed acceptable, but unfortunately, the timing was not right to establish a Tau Beta Pi chapter. After reviewing the course catalog sent by Gearhart, Matthews responds to Conrad's letter with some not-so-good news. At that time, only eight Carnegie entrance units were required for admission into KSAC, and Tau Beta Pi would not grant a chapter to an institution where less than 14 units were required.
My dear Sir: Your inquiry of the first reached me, and I wish to say that upon examination of your catalog, a copy of which I received a few days ago, I find that only eight units are required for admission. As we have a very definite feeling that chapters should not be established where less than fourteen units are required, I fear that our chapters would not be inclined to consider favorably a petition from your institution at this time. If there are any points which might put another face upon this matter, I should be glad to have you write me concerning them. Until this is cleared up it would be profitless to discuss other details, but I will say that the method of averaging you mention, if weighted according to the value of the subject in credits, would be satisfactory. Awaiting your further favors, I am, cordially yours, Secretary.
Prof. Conrad acknowledges the shortcoming in entrance units required and reports no reason for which Matthews should reconsider. It is not mentioned in his letters, but months later, in May 1912, Conrad would become one of the charter members of the Epsilon Chapter of Sigma Tau.
My dear Sir: I have your letter of September (February) 5, and wish to thank you for the same.
I can think of no reason which would lead your Executive Council to consider favorably an application for a Chapter of Tau Beta Pi at this place. The fourteen-unit entrance requirement effectively blocks the plan, so far as I can see. Respectfully, L.E. Conrad
Bowerman returned to the storyline on October 27th, 1914, when he wrote to inform Matthews that the KSAC entrance requirements had been increased to match those of other institutions with Tau Beta Pi chapters. He said the time had come to start a chapter at Manhattan, and asked for Matthews opinion.
Dear Sir: A few of the instructors in Engineering here have been wondering if it would be a good thing to have a Chapter of Tau Beta Pi established here. Since two years ago the entrance requirements here have been up to the standard of other schools, which have Chapters, and we think it is time to start a chapter here.
Please give us your opinion concerning this, and the requirements which we would have to fulfill in order to get the Chapter. Very truly yours, M.R. Bowerman, Alpha of Mich. '09
In response to Bowerman, Matthews restates the preferred entrance requirements and provides new information on the informal requirement regarding the average number of engineering graduates. He refers Bowerman to the constitution and offers to expedite the process as much as possible. A discussion of installation expenses follows, after which Matthews wraps up by asking for another catalog, presumably to double-check entrance requirements.
Dear Brother Bowerman: Your letter of the 27th is at hand, and contents noted. An Institution in order to be considered by us, must require fourteen Carnegie entrance units or the equivalent thereof. As I understand it, your college did not meet this requirement some time ago. Also, there should be an average of about 40 engineers or more in the graduating class, with reasonable assurance that this number will not be materially diminished. In addition to these, our unofficial requirements, you will find the official ones in the enclosed copy of the Constitution, Article VI. The Constitution has been amended, and is now in press, but Article VI has not been changed.
If you desire to petition for a chapter I shall be glad to expedite the matter as much as possible. There should be not more than twenty petitioners, all of whose full names should be signed to the petition
The net expense for an installation would be about $10.00 per man, plus the expenses of the installing officer, probably myself. I understand that the University of Kansas is arranging to petition for a chapter, and in case these two matters came up together, the installing officer might attend both of them on one trip, thus reducing expenses. It is customary to charge an initiation fee to all the members of about $15.00 or more, depending upon local conditions.Â
If I can give you any further information, I shall be pleased to do so. Very fraternally yours, Secretary-Treasurer.
P. S. Please send me a copy of the latest edition of the college catalog.
Bowerman reports 42 engineering graduates in total over the past year, which satisfies the new requirement provided in Matthews' last letter. He continues, that the KSAC entrance requirement is now 15 Carnegie units, which also complies with the Association's standards. He questions whether KSAC will have to wait until a few years have passed under the new requirements before a chapter can be pursued, and he finishes by asking for Matthews' opinion on having two honorary engineering fraternities on the same campus, since Sigma Tau had been present on campus since 1912.
Dear Sir: Your letter enclosing copy of constitution of Tau Beta Pi, received. I am sending you under separate cover, a copy of our College catalogue. You will see that our graduates for last year in Engineering, numbered 42.
In regard to the entrance requirements, the requirements were raised one year ago, to the 15 Carnegie unit basis, our Freshman and Sophomore classes are now on that basis, and we would probably have to wait at least another year before asking for a Chapter. In the meantime, will you please give me a list of the Colleges and Universities which have Chapters at present? Is the Directory published yet, and what is the price per copy?
We now have a chapter of Sigma Tau here, which was established two years ago. What is your opinion as to the advisability of our trying for another honorary fraternity? Very truly yours, M.R. Bowerman
Matthews acknowledges Bowerman's concerns and informs that KSAC need not wait to petition for a chapter. He explains that the 15-unit requirement applies to the institution, not the students themselves. He encourages Bowerman to petition immediately, so that Matthews may install Kansas Beta at Manhattan during the same trip in which he will install Kansas Alpha at Lawrence and Arkansas Alpha at Fayetteville. He questions Sigma Tau's identity as a purely honorary society and assures Bowerman that the two organizations can coexist.
Dear Brother Bowerman: Yours of the 4th is at hand and contents noted. If you feel that the conditions favor an immediate petition for a chapter at your college, there is no necessity of waiting until later. It is not required that the present men should be on the fifteen unit basis. That applies to the college itself. In case you should wish to petition immediately, I may say that since granting the Arkansas chapter I have been trying to arrange to make a trip out there to install it. We shall receive a petition from K.U., shortly, and if you should petition at once, it might be possible to get action upon both Kansas movements, and for me to arrange to cover all three places in one trip, thus materially reducing the expense. I am sending you under separate cover a copy of the July BENT, which gives our chapter list, and also contains interesting matter regarding the last convention. We have rather a limited supply of these, and I should like to have this one returned unless you would care to enter a subscription to THE BENT to begin with that number.
The new Directory is not published and will probably not be before some time in January or February. I cannot now tell what the price will be.
As regards Sigma Tau, I do not believe it to be a purely honorary society. At some places where we have chapters, Sigma Tau men are frequently taken into Tau Beta Pi. I think their organization is more of a professional one, like Phi Delta Phi, or Eta Kappa Nu.Â
Trusting that this covers the matters mentioned in your letter, I remain, Most fraternally yours, Secretary-Treasurer.
Bowerman informs that KSAC would submit a petition in a matter of days, and asks for more exact information about installation expenses. He also inquires about the eligibility of alumni who graduated under the old entrance requirements.
Dear Brother Matthews: It appears now as though we would make petition for a Chapter of Tau Beta Pi, within a few days. In the meantime, could you give me a better idea as to the cost of installation of the Chapter? About what will be our share of your expenses, and what initiation fees should be charged? Also what share of the expenses should be borne by present members, who are expecting to be active members of our Chapter?
In regard to the eligibility of Alumni, would a man be eligible when graduated several years ago under the old entrance requirements, if his scholarship is of proper grade? Thanking you, I remain, very truly yours, M.R. Bowerman
Matthews writes the EC on December 1st, 1914, letting them know that he has been communicating with KSAC for multiple years about starting a chapter, and that the entrance unit impediment has been recently rectified. He asks the Council to consider granting advance approval of the petition, based on KSAC's high rating, so that he could forward a petition to the chapters for immediate action. Matthews would be installing the Arkansas and Kansas Alpha chapters on the week of December 13-19, and he would like to install the Manhattan chapter then as well.
To the Members of the Council: I have been receiving communications from the Kansas Agricultural & Mechanical College at Manhattan, Kansas, looking toward formulating a petition for a chapter at that institution. This matter has been up once or twice before, and nothing was done because the college was not up to standard entrance requirements. Now, however, that difficulty has been removed, and 15 Carnegie units acquired. For the year 1913-14 the attendance in Engineering was as follows:Â
42 seniors
61 juniors
91 sophomores
93 freshmen
I do not know whether the present year shows an increase or not. I judge from a perusal of the Catalog that the college is on par with such institutions as Iowa State, at Ames, Ia., M.A.C, etc. It is rated in Class A by U.S. Dept. of Agriculture - the highest grading.
Would the members of the Council wish to make advance approval of the petition which may or may not be received, so that immediately upon receipt the matter might be submitted to the chapters? I am now planning to make the trip to install the Arkansas and Kansas chapters the week of December 13-19, and should of course wish to include the Manhattan proposition if it materializes in time. If it does not, it can be installed later by the Kansas chapter. Most fraternally yours, Secretary-Treasurer.
Matthews writes Bowerman to say that the KSAC petition, if there will be one, has unfortunately not arrived in time so that he could be the installing officer. His plans are to install the Arkansas Alpha Chapter on December 14th, and the Kansas Alpha Chapter on the 17th. Bowerman's presence would be expected at the Kansas Alpha installation, since their chapter would likely be installing a chapter at KSAC in the future.
My dear Bowerman: If the movement for a chapter at your institution is going to come to a head, I regret that it has not done so in time for the installation to be made by myself on the trip I am to take next week. I install the Arkansas chapter on the 14th inst., and the Kansas chapter on the 17th. In anticipation of an installation at your institution some time later, will you try to be present at the Kansas ceremony? If you do get a chapter the installation can be made by yourself or some other deputized for that purpose, with the aid of the Kansas chapter. I trust therefore you will not fail to be in Lawrence on the 17th. Kindly advise Brother C.C. Williams, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, regarding your attendance and say that I asked you to come over. Most fraternally yours, Secretary-Treasurer
A lapse in communication must've led to this letter, since Alfred C. Bux was a student in the Mechanical Arts Department where Myron Bowerman was an instructor. Maybe Bowerman became discouraged and dropped the matter. Anyway, Bux's letter shows that there was still a desire amongst a group of students to start a Tau Beta Pi chapter at Manhattan, despite the absence of a petition from Bowerman.
Dear Sir: A number of we students here at the Kansas State Agricultural College of the Mechanic Arts Department, would like as much information relative to getting a chapter of Tau Beta Pi as you can give us at this time.
The questions we would like to know at this time are, how long must a association be organized before you will consider a petition, what prequisites must the members attain, as standing in college year etc., and well to make a long story short send us all the information you conveniently can.
Thanking you for any information you can conveniently give us, I beg to remain, Sincerely yours, Albert C. Bux
Habing discussed the matter of a chapter at Manhattan for many years with Bowerman, Matthews refers Bux to him for any further questions.
Dear Sir: Yours of February 8 is at hand this morning, and in regard to the questions you ask relative to the establishment of a chapter of Tau Beta Pi, would refer you to Mr. M.R. Bowerman, of your city, with whom this matter has previously been taken up at length.
Trusting that the above will cover the matter, I remain, Most fraternally yours, Secretary-Treasurer
Instead of asking Bowerman about it, Bux sends another letter to Matthews asking when he and Bowerman last took up the matter.Â
Your letter of February 11 received and there is one question that we would like to know, which is, when was that matter taken up with Mr. Bowerman.
Trusting that you will be able to give us this information and thanking your for your favor of the past, I am, Resp. yours, Albert C. Bux
In responding to Bux's letter of February 19th, 1915, Matthews explains a critical piece of the story that does not exist elsewhere on written record. He says that Bowerman and he had talked the matter over and concluded that conditions were not proper for a Manhattan movement. Bowerman's presence had been requested at the December 17th installation in Lawrence, so that's where the discussion must've taken place. He refers Bux to Bowerman once more and offers his assistance if and when conditions become favorable.
Dear Sir: Yours of the 19th is at hand and answering it, I will say that I discussed thoroughly with Mr. M.R. Bowerman, the matter of a chapter of Tau Beta Pi at Manhattan, just before the Holidays. As he is one of our members, and knows my views upon the matter, he may be considered as being representative of our society in this connection. There are three or four other members of Tau Beta Pi at Kansas State and no movement for a chapter could be entertained without their full sanction. I believe the conclusion reached by Mr. Bowerman and myself, after talking the matter over, was that conditions there were such that it would be well not to attempt a movement just at this time. However, conditions always change, and if there is a sentiment there in favor of a chapter of Tau Beta PI, we shall be glad to entertain the matter if the local members will approve. Very truly yours, Secretary-Treasurer
Just over a year later, Charles F. Zeigler, sophomore in civil engineering, reached out to then national president of Tau Beta Pi Henry H. Higbie (NY-A '04), by means of a letter sent to him in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Zeigler expresses a general distaste for the governance of the Epsilon Chapter, saying that it is controlled by a particular literary society. Zeigler asks for information on starting a Tau Beta Pi chapter, wanting to do so by early fall. However, he wishes to keep his request for information secret, for, he says, that it would ruin his chances for joining Sigma Tau if they knew he had been communicating with Tau Beta Pi.Â
President Higbie added the handwritten note at the bottom of this letter and forwarded it to Matthews in Knoxville. He asked Matthews to send Zeigler the desired information and told him that he had written back explaining that a chapter would probably not be granted so fast. Higbie questioned the tone of the letter and proposed for Kansas Alpha to be contacted to see what they thought.
Dear Sir: As you are President of the honorary engineering society, Tau Beta Pi, I concluded that perhaps you would be able to give me some information concerning the probability of the location of a chapter in this school. This college, Kansas State, has an enrollment of over three thousand students, about three hundred and fifty being engineers. A number of honorary societies have chapters here, such as Alpha Psi, Alpha Zeta, Omicron Nu, Gamma Phi Delta, and Phi Kappa Phi, but the only honorary engineering society is Sigma Tau. Sigma Tau is largely controlled by a certain literary society, which causes men who would make good members to be set aside for perhaps an inferior who happened to belong to this literary society. Many students are not satisfied with conditions and would welcome another society, such as the one of which you are president.
Of course upperclassmen only may be taken into Sigma Tau but there are a number of these who are good students that have either not been asked or who would not join them. These along with the pick of this year's sophomore class would form a nucleus for a new organization. I am practically positive that the head of the engineering division would render us great assistance.
I would be greatly obliged to you if you will send me particulars telling how a chapter might be established and if there is any possibility of one being granted this spring or early fall. I wish you to use the utmost secrecy about this matter for if it were known that I had been corresponding with Tau Beta Pi, it would ruin my chances for Sigma Tau. In the event of being refused a chapter of Tau Beta Pi I would then have to resort to the next best and take Sigma Tau. My grades are among the highest in the sophomore class. Anxiously awaiting your reply, I remain, Yours truly, C.I. Zeigler
(Higbie forwarded Zeigler's letter to Matthews with a handwritten note added)
Matthews: I have written to this man telling him that you would furnish information and have told him I doubt that a new chapter would be established so quickly. Better sound out Kansas Alpha on this? I do not think that TBP need feel entirely confluente by the tone of this letter, do you? Get them to send a catalog of their college to each member of the Council. Higbie
Matthews tells Zeigler to approach Bowerman for more information, since they discussed the matter at length and concluded that conditions were not right for attempting to secure a Manhattan chapter. He would be happy to proceed if Bowerman thinks it is worthwhile, but he says that there's hardly a chance for a Manhattan chapter to be granted within the proposed timeframe. Present this letter to Bowerman, and he should be happy to discuss it, Matthews says.
Dear Sir: Your letter to Prof. Higbie has been referred to me for answer. About a year and a half ago I discussed the question of a chapter of Tau Beta Pi at Manhattan with Prof. M.R. Bowerman, whom you of course know. We concluded then that conditions were not right for attempting to secure a charter. I suggest that you see him, and if he now thinks conditions are improved, I shall be glad to further efforts in this line as rapidly as possible. It is pretty late in the year now, and the chances are action could not be secured from our chapters so as to permit placing a chapter before fall should the action be favorable. Upon presentation of this letter, I am sure Prof. Bowerman will be glad to consider the case with you. Very truly yours, Secretary-Treasurer.
Weeks later, Zeigler responds back to let Matthews know that he discussed the matter with the Tau Beta Pi faculty members at KSAC, and they have advised for the attempt to be dropped. He apologizes for taking so long to respond at says he is a busy member of the varsity baseball squad, which leaves little free time. Note that Zeigler went on to join the Epsilon Chapter on October 3rd, 1916.
Dear Sir: After having consulted several members of the engineering faculty who are members of Tau Beta Pi, it has been decided to drop any attempt of establishing a chapter here in the near future. I ask your pardon for not having answered more promptly, but I am on the varsity baseball squad and have little spare time.
Thanking you very kindly for any trouble or inconvenience which I may have caused you. I am, yours truly, C. Forrest Zeigler
Over five years passed before HQ heard, again, of a desire for a chapter at Manhattan. Walter T. Rolfe, a member of the Epsilon Chapter, sent this letter to Matthews reopening the decade-long inquiry. Rolfe expressed that a group of men was considering petitioning for a chapter and asked for more of the same information which Matthews had provided to others in the past.
Dear Mr. Matthews: There is a group of men here at the Kansas State Agricultural College that is considering the petitioning of Tau Beta Pi Association and they have been advised to write you for information. They are desirous of having the information as to the procedure of such an action.
These are a few of the questions that have come up and which we would like to have you answer if you feel free to do so:
To whom should such a petition be addressed?
What should such a petition contain?
When and where will the next Convention of Tau Beta PI Association be held?
Would it be advisable for this body of men to send a representative to this Convention?
We would also like very much to have you send us any other information of such nature that would help us if you are in a position to do so. Yours very respectfully, Walter T. Rolfe
It is assumed that Rolfe spoke with Bowerman about the issue, and he advised for the matter to be dropped, and that's why the earliest period of correspondence records ends with Matthews' letter of November 25th, 1921. He refers Rolfe to Bowerman and offers to provide more information in the case that Rolfe is unable to locate Bowerman or any other member of Tau Beta Pi to consult with.
Dear Mr. Rolfe: Answering yours of November 21, I should ask you to consult with Mr. M.R. Bowerman in connection of the proposed petition for a chapter of Tau Beta Pi. About six or seven years ago he approached me in this matter, and we met and talked it over, but he felt that the time was not right to undertake at the movement. If he is not there, and you cannot find any member of Tau Beta Pi to consult with let me know and I shall give you further information. Very truly yours, Secretary-Treasurer.