Keno Results

In addition to verification, all other legal requirements must be met before you can be declared a winner. In the event of a discrepancy between our online results and the computerized keno system, the latter shall prevail.

The Winning Combinations reports show you which 20 numbers were drawn in every keno game at each of our four live ball draw locations. The Ball Draw Frequency reports analyze that information for you, making it easy to see which numbers were drawn most often last week at each location.

Keno Results

Download 🔥 https://urluss.com/2y5Jbs 🔥

If a player chooses "Try Now", the player acknowledges that he or she is playing the trial version of this Game; he or she is not purchasing a play; and the player will not be awarded a cash prize even though the Game results may reveal a prize.

In the event of any discrepancy or inconsistency among the display of the game results, the Game Rules, the iLottery Terms of Use, and any other information issued by the Kentucky Lottery with respect to this Game, the Game Rules will prevail.

Winning numbers of the Kentucky Lottery stand as drawn. The Kentucky Lottery is not responsible for misprinted numbers on this page or any other medium. The Kentucky Lottery makes no expressed or implied warranties or representation of any kind as to the content, accuracy, completeness, reliability, or timeliness of the information contained on this web site or any link provided herein. Note: Earliest date for available search results is 180 days prior.

You can look up Keno past results in a list view on the Past Results page. Just select a date from the calendar menu to see a list of results for the day, including today's results which are updated every few minutes.

Neither OLG nor any of its employees, agents or service providers shall be liable for any loss incurred by a Player that results from any Error, including any loss of winnings that results from a forfeiture thereof by the Player as a result of the Error. OLG shall use reasonable efforts to notify a Player if any Error has adversely impacted the Player, or if the correction of any Error adversely impacts the Player.

OLG's records, as maintained in the iGaming System (and/or OLG's central computer-controlled online system, in the case of a Draw-Based Lottery Game Played Online), will be the final authority in determining the circumstances of a Player's participation in the relevant Game and the results of such participation. In the event of a disagreement between the result that appears on a Player's screen and the relevant Game servers (and/or OLG's central computer-controlled online system, in the case of a Draw-Based Lottery Game Played Online), the result that appears in the Game servers (and/or OLG's central computer-controlled online system, in the case of a Draw-Based Lottery Game Played Online) will prevail.

The Sunset Station results posted here are for INFORMATIONAL purposes ONLY! Every Keno ticket MUST be PLAYED and winnings COLLECTED at the Sunset Station Casino, Las Vegas Nevada.The numbers posted are not OFFICIAL until all 20 numbers are drawn and VERIFIED as correct. Any dispute will be decided by the numbers shown on the ACTUAL Keno balls drawn.Note: Multi-Race games of 10-1000 have ONE YEAR to collect and you need NOT be present during the calling of the games.

Learn about 190 ways of 8, it's the easiest and most exciting way to play keno - it's exciting because it's so hard not to win. Simply choose the amount of money per way. You can play for as little as 10 cents a way that's only 19 dollars and you cover all 80 numbers on the ticket with so many different ways to win - 190.

To play this ticket write 190/8 on the top part of the ticket where is says "mark number of spots or ways played" and bring it to a keno writer. Then each group of 4 is combined with every other group of 4 to make 190 possible combinations of 8 spots. That's a whole lot of chances to win! Once you play this ticket look at the brochure under 8 spot and see how much you won or do it the easy way and come back to keno and have a keno writer check your ticket for wins!

The minimum wager on a straight ticket is $0.25 with a four (4) game minimum.

To learn more about cost and payoffs of various tickets, visit the Keno Lounge to speak with one of our friendly team members or to review the information charts in the available keno brochures.

With the XPERTX system, game results are available anywhere your customers may go! Whether they are staying in your hotel, at home, or on the road; your customers can watch game results, live! Combined with the ability to play up to 1000 games at a time, players can buy tickets at your location and watch results from anywhere - then return to collect winnings... and play again!

The Nov. 7 ballot question for Rochester and other cities was whether to allow keno sales in state-licensed bars and restaurants. Money would be raised to help fund full-day kindergarten. Rochester initially approved the measure by one vote.

Guest users are limited to viewing 20 past results. Please join a membership to view more results. Only Gold members may export results to CSV. Please join the Gold membership.

This first news release of the series focuses on the East Keno target area, which covers the eastern-most 12 km of the 35 km long Keno Hill Silver District and is the least explored part of the prolific district. Results of on-going compilation and synthesis of historic exploration data along with results from 2018 exploration have confirmed:

A total of 2,220 soil samples were collected during the 2018 field season in the East Keno target area from grids and contour sampling at Beauvette, Cobalt West, Cobalt Hill, McMillan, Fox/UKHM, McKim Creek and North Granite. Soil samples were analyzed by XRF and 36-element ICP. XRF results were directly compared to lab results both in 2017 and 2018 to develop comparable correlations. Soil grid sizes and sample spacing varied, depending on whether the samples were offsetting identified mineralization or were reconnaissance in previously unsampled areas. Several grids showed significant anomalies that all remain open to expansion with silver in soil grades up to 4.6 g/t and Ag Eq. grades up to 10 g/t.

This review examined the details of the models, including model algorithms, parameter values, and boundary conditions; the review did not assess the draft Klamath River TMDL or the TMDL allocations. Attention to the details of a model is one of the best ways to identify potential problems, correct them if possible, and begin to assess the magnitude of potential model errors and uncertainty. Model users need to determine the level of acceptable uncertainty associated with their objectives, identify all sources of potential uncertainty (model uncertainty, data uncertainty, etc.), and assess their approach and results accordingly. In the draft Klamath River TMDL, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality identified the upstream boundary conditions as the largest source of uncertainty for both the current and natural conditions scenarios, not the model algorithms or choice of model parameters. We agree that the upstream boundary conditions are one of the largest, if not the largest, source of model uncertainty; therefore, the derivation of upstream boundary conditions may be more important to the TMDL than some other model-related issues identified in this review.

Several important changes were made to the natural conditions scenario. First, the elevation of the Keno reef was corrected; the elevation specified in the original model was 1 foot too high, which affected the volume of the pooled reach and the travel time through it. The most important changes to this scenario were to the upstream boundary inputs of organic matter and algae, which affect incoming fluxes of nitrogen and phosphorus. Algal biomass inputs were increased by approximately 60 percent during summer because of a change in the way those inputs were derived from results of the UKL TMDL model. Non-algal organic matter inputs were decreased, particularly in summer to correct a problem attributed to double-counting of phosphorus in the original inputs. The distribution of non-algal organic matter was changed from 20 percent dissolved in the original model to 90 percent dissolved in the revised model in response to review comments and published data. The overall sum of algal biomass and non-living organic matter was decreased, which resulted in lower inputs of total phosphorus and nitrogen. Total phosphorus inputs were less than 0.03 mg/L, and although the inputs were derived from selected results of the UKL TMDL model, these concentrations seem too low to be representative of a historically eutrophic system surrounded by extensive wetlands, peat soils, and a groundwater system high in phosphorus. The draft TMDL states that the upstream boundary conditions are the greatest source of uncertainty, greater than any uncertainty associated with the models. Efforts to improve existing models of algal growth and nutrient cycling in UKL, therefore, would provide a substantial benefit to downstream modeling efforts on the Klamath River.

In summary, the TMDL models used to simulate Link and Klamath Rivers from Link River Dam to Keno Dam were revised to fix several problems and address various issues. The resulting models are an improvement over those that were reviewed by USGS in 2009, and represent a useful advance in the simulation of a complex system that is difficult to model. However, several issues remain that cause increased uncertainty in the model results. Depending on the objectives of the modeling, now or in the future, these remaining issues could be more or less important. For the Klamath River TMDL, the upstream boundary conditions may be a larger source of uncertainty than the concerns with model algorithms and model parameters identified in this review. Efforts to re-evaluate the available models of algal growth and nutrient cycling in UKL would be highly beneficial to downstream modeling efforts in the Klamath River. 17dc91bb1f