According to them, they "are the most comprehensive media bias resource on the internet. There are currently 8700+ media sources, journalists, and politicians listed in our database and growing every day." You can search to check the bias on many sources by searching them by name or URL. HOWVER, use of this site does not substitute for you confirming the specific articles CRAAP worthiness.
This website covers how websites should be made. In doing so, they cover how to find trustworthy sites and avoiding things like plagiarism. There is also a fancy infographic. A small portion of which you can see in the picture.
NewseumED.org offers free resources to cultivate the First Amendment and media literacy skills essential to civic life. Among their many resources, they developed a list of Consumer Questions to evaluate websites that you may consume.
In their own words, "We are a nonpartisan, nonprofit “consumer advocate” for voters that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics. We monitor the factual accuracy of what is said by major U.S. political players in the form of TV ads, debates, speeches, interviews and news releases. Our goal is to apply the best practices of both journalism and scholarship, and to increase public knowledge and understanding."
It is a good website to see if there are false claims or fake news out there on your topic. They used to keep a misinformation directory That listed websites who posted deceptive content. Unfortunately, the proliferation of mis- and dis- information has increased exponentially and the site is no longer able to keep up. It hasn't bee updated since 2018.
This has been the traditional method used at SHS to evaluate websites.
The Houston Community College Libraries have a website that discusses the method as well.
The Berkeley Library System organizes the information a bit differently, but is the bases for the picture to the left.