About our meeting
About our meeting
M2 students can join the oral presentation session to present their master thesis.
Students under M1 (including high school students and below) can give a short talk. Also, M2 students who are will complete the master program this year (e.g., students who will complete in September 2023) are welcome!
Of course, just auditing is welcome!
We plan the invitation lecture.
Oral presentation (hybrid)
Presentation: 15 minutes & Question/Answer: 4 minutes
Onsite / Zoom
Japanese or English
Please submit your slides before the deadline for smooth management of our meeting.
Short talks (onsite only)
One-minute talk about your research by one slide.
Either Japanese or English is O.K.
Short talks will start after the oral presentation session.
An example is below.
Registration of presentation
Students who will graduate from master's programs from April 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023 are welcome to make an oral presentation regardless of field, district, and academic society. Students under M1 are welcome to make a short talk regardless of field, district, and academic society.
Oral presentation: 2022/12/9–2023/1/10
Short talks: 2022/12/9–2023/1/10
Please register oral presentation & short talks in Registration.
Personal information provided through this application will be managed in such a way that it is not leaked, and will only be used by the committee to provide information about the meeting and to contact you after the presentation for feedback and other purposes.
Technical oral presentation awards
The Best Oral Presentation Award or the Outstanding Oral Presentation Award will be given to the presenters making an excellent oral presentation. We hope these awards will encourage all oral presenters. Details are as follows:
- Recipients and awards
All oral presenters will be eligible. The Best Oral Presentation Award (certificate and extra prize) will be given to one presenter, and the Outstanding Oral Presentation Award (certificate and extra prize) will be given to two presenters.
- Judging policy
Achievement or future potential will not be considered. Only presentation techniques will be evaluated.
- Judging criteria
Judging will be conducted by the invited speakers and the committee members.
The evaluation is based on the following four criteria.
Evaluation of presentation
Consistency of logical development, clarity of the points to be conveyed, clarity of the purpose of the research and the problem to be solved, and clarity for non-specialists.Evaluation of slides
Beauty and clarity of slides
(clarity of charts, the appropriate amount of information, color usage, conveying the main points of each slide, etc.)Evaluation of questions and answers
Appropriateness of the responsesEvaluation of the abstract
Whether the significance of the research is conveyed, the content of the research is conveyed, and whether it is consistent with the content of the presentation, etc.
Invitation lecture
Dr. Kagari Aoki
Assistant Professor, Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo
Homepage: http://fishecol.aori.u-tokyo.ac.jp/aoki/