If you want wireless convenience, long battery life, and multipoint pairing for mobile gaming, choose JBL Tune 510; if you need a simple wired, foldable option with a standard 3.5 mm connection, choose JVC HAS160B. For a phone that supports Bluetooth, JBL is the more flexible everyday pick; JVC suits someone who prefers a direct cable connection and adjustable headband.
• JBL Tune 510 strength: Bluetooth listening, up to 40 hours of battery life, and multipoint connections; trade-off: it has no noise control and needs charging.
• JVC HAS160B strength: A 3.5 mm wired connection, flat-folding design, and soft earpads for sound isolation; trade-off: it does not offer the listed wireless features of the JBL.
• JBL Tune 510 is for people who want wireless headphones that can move between two Bluetooth devices.
• JVC HAS160B is for listeners who want a straightforward wired pair with an adjustable steel headband.
• For mobile gaming: JBL’s wireless convenience may suit casual play, while JVC’s cable-based setup may appeal to someone who wants a direct connection. Neither sheet specifies gaming latency or a microphone.
The JBL Tune 510 is an on-ear Bluetooth headphone built around convenience. Its listed sound signature emphasizes JBL Pure Bass, and its 32 mm dynamic drivers are specified across a 20 Hz–20 kHz frequency range. Those details describe a familiar music-oriented setup, not a promise about how every game, song, or voice will sound. If bass-forward listening is part of what you want from a headset, the JBL’s stated sound focus is a relevant point in its favor.
The clearest practical advantage is battery life: JBL lists up to 40 hours, with a two-hour charge time. A five-minute charge is said to provide up to two hours of listening, which could help when you realize the headphones need power shortly before heading out. The foldable, lightweight design is also intended for carrying, and the padded ear cushions are designed for comfort. Bluetooth range is listed as 10 meters, while multipoint connections let you switch between two Bluetooth devices. That could be useful if you want to move between a phone and another compatible device without treating the headphones as a wired accessory.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-19 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
For mobile gaming, those features make the JBL a convenient option when you want to play without a cable getting in the way. Multipoint headphones for mobile gaming can also be appealing if you regularly use more than one Bluetooth device. Still, the product information does not specify gaming latency, microphone performance, or active noise cancellation, so I would not choose it on the assumption that it offers those features. Its listed noise control is none. Who should skip it: skip the JBL if you specifically want a wired 3.5 mm connection or sound isolation stated as a feature.
The JVC HAS160B is the simpler, cable-first choice. It uses a 3.5 mm jack, so it does not depend on battery life for listening. The listed driver size is 30 mm, and its frequency range is 12–24,000 Hz. JVC describes the sound in terms of dynamic bass and crisp highs, but those specifications alone do not establish which headphone will sound better to you. The practical distinction is that this model keeps the setup straightforward: connect the cable to a compatible device and listen.
Portability is part of the design. The headphones fold flat, and JVC describes them as compact enough to slip into a bag. Soft earpads are intended to provide comfort and sound isolation, while the adjustable stainless-steel headband can adapt to the wearer’s head size. That combination may suit someone who wants a light, uncomplicated pair for commuting, travel, or listening at a desk and does not want to keep track of charging. The listed control method is a remote, though the sheet does not give details about its functions.
For mobile gaming, the cable avoids relying on Bluetooth, but compatibility depends on whether the gaming device has a 3.5 mm jack or can connect to one. The JVC’s specifications do not list Bluetooth, a microphone, multipoint pairing, or active noise cancellation. A search for “ANC bone conduction headphones for mobile gaming” points to features this model does not claim: it is neither listed as having ANC nor described as bone-conduction headphones. Who should skip it: skip the JVC if wireless listening or switching between Bluetooth devices is a must.
• Best for wireless listening → JBL Tune 510. Its listed connection is Bluetooth, so it does not require a headphone cable between the headphones and a compatible device.
• Best for a direct 3.5 mm connection → JVC HAS160B. That is its listed connection, making it the natural fit for a device with a compatible jack.
• Best for long stretches between charges → JBL Tune 510. JBL specifies up to 40 hours of battery life and a two-hour charging time. The JVC does not require battery charging for its wired connection.
• Best for switching between devices → JBL Tune 510. Its multipoint feature is designed to move between two Bluetooth devices.
• Best for a flat-folding wired option → JVC HAS160B. JVC specifically describes the design as foldable and compact for carrying.
• Best when sound isolation is a stated feature → JVC HAS160B. Its soft earpads are described as providing sound isolation; JBL lists no noise control.
• Best for a quick battery top-up → JBL Tune 510. Its five-minute charge is specified to provide up to two hours of listening.
• Best headset for mobile gaming? → Choose based on connection needs. JBL offers wireless convenience, while JVC offers a wired connection. Neither sheet provides latency or microphone details, so those needs require careful checking before choosing.
Before choosing either model for gaming, check how your phone or handheld connects to headphones. JBL’s Bluetooth connection avoids a cable, but the data does not state its latency or describe a gaming mode. That means I would not assume it is the right fit for timing-sensitive play just because it is wireless. JVC’s 3.5 mm connection offers a direct wired setup, but only if your device has a compatible jack or supports the connection through an appropriate adapter. Adapter compatibility is not specified here.
Think about how you use headphones outside a game, too. JBL’s multipoint feature and up-to-40-hour battery life are useful if you regularly move between Bluetooth devices or listen for long periods. Its quick-charge detail may matter when you forget to charge before leaving. JVC avoids that charging routine, and its folding design is suited to packing away. In exchange, its wired connection means you have to manage a cable.
Comfort and noise are also personal priorities. JBL lists soft padded ear cushions, while JVC describes soft earpads with sound-isolating intent. Neither sheet gives a fit measurement or a quantified noise-reduction figure, so those descriptions cannot tell you exactly how either pair will feel or how much outside sound you will hear. Consider whether you value wireless flexibility or a cable-first design more, then check the current price on Amazon before making a purchase decision.
I would choose the JBL Tune 510 for mobile gaming if wireless convenience, multipoint pairing, and long listed battery life are my priorities. Its 40-hour specification and quick-charge feature make it the more flexible everyday option on paper. I would choose the JVC HAS160B instead if I wanted a wired 3.5 mm connection and a fold-flat design, especially for a compatible device. Neither is a clear fit for someone who specifically needs confirmed gaming latency or microphone performance.
The JBL offers Bluetooth and multipoint connections, while the JVC uses a 3.5 mm wired connection. Neither product sheet specifies gaming latency or microphone performance, so choose according to your device connection needs rather than assuming either is optimized for gaming.
The JBL’s listed noise control is none, so the supplied specifications do not claim active noise cancellation or sound isolation. JVC describes its soft earpads as providing sound isolation, but it does not list active noise cancellation either.
The JVC connects through a 3.5 mm jack, and its product information does not list a battery. That makes it the more straightforward choice if you want wired listening without a charging routine, provided your device supports the connection.
Value depends on which features matter to you, and no price is stated here. JBL offers Bluetooth, multipoint pairing, and up to 40 hours of battery life; JVC offers a 3.5 mm connection, flat folding, and stated sound isolation. Check the current price on Amazon and compare it with the features you will actually use.
• Turnstile Audio TAPH100 vs Sennheiser HD 480
• eKids Spiderman Headphones vs Amazon Basics Ear
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.