If you want wireless freedom and long battery life for mobile gaming, choose JBL Tune 510BT; if you need a simple wired pair with a flat-folding design, choose JVC HAS160A. For most players, I’d pick the JBL: its Bluetooth connection avoids a cable across your hands, and its battery is rated for up to 40 hours. The JVC makes more sense if you prefer a wired connection and do not need a built-in microphone.
• JBL Tune 510BT: Bluetooth listening, switching between two devices, a built-in microphone, and up to 40 hours of battery life. Trade-off: it needs charging and has no listed noise control.
• JVC HAS160A: Wired 3.5 mm connection, 30 mm drivers, soft ear pads, and a flat-folding design. Trade-off: it has no microphone and no wireless Bluetooth connection for listening.
• Choose the JBL if you want wireless convenience, call handling, and extended battery life.
• Choose the JVC if a wired setup, foldable portability, and a steel headband matter more.
• Neither model is a purpose-built gaming headset with listed gaming-specific features.
The JBL Tune 510BT is an on-ear Bluetooth headphone for someone who wants to move around without a cable. It can connect to two devices and switch between them, which may be handy if you keep a phone and tablet in rotation. Its built-in microphone and ear-cup buttons also let you handle calls without reaching for your phone.
For mobile gaming, the wireless design is the main appeal. There is no audio cable to snag while holding a phone, and up to 40 hours of stated battery life means charging need not be part of every short session. A five-minute charge is listed as providing two additional hours of music, while a full recharge takes about two hours. The headphones fold, and their headband adjusts.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-17 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
The JVC HAS160A is a straightforward wired on-ear headphone. Its 3.5 mm plug connects to devices with a compatible headphone jack, so it does not rely on a Bluetooth connection or a rechargeable battery. The cable-based setup can appeal to someone who wants to avoid keeping headphones charged.
Its 30 mm drivers and soft ear pads are the central design details. The ear pads are described as helping isolate sound, but the product information does not list active noise cancellation. The flat-folding design is useful when you want headphones that pack down for a bag, while the adjustable steel headband offers a more structured frame.
For mobile gaming, the JVC’s wired connection can be a practical fit if your device has a 3.5 mm headphone jack or you already use a compatible adapter. But it has no listed microphone, which makes it a poor match for players who need voice chat through the headphones. The product information also lists no Bluetooth listening, despite a Bluetooth entry in its wireless-technology field; its stated connection type is wired, so I would not buy it expecting wireless use.
• Best for wireless play on a phone → JBL Tune 510BT. Its Bluetooth connection removes the headphone cable from the gaming setup.
• Best for a wired connection → JVC HAS160A. It uses a 3.5 mm plug, provided your device has a compatible jack or adapter.
• Best for long stretches between charges → JBL Tune 510BT. Its stated battery life is up to 40 hours, though it still needs recharging.
• Best for switching between a phone and tablet → JBL Tune 510BT. It can switch between two Bluetooth devices.
• Best for built-in call handling → JBL Tune 510BT. It has a microphone on the ear cup and buttons for calls and sound controls.
• Best for a flat-folding wired option → JVC HAS160A. Its design folds flat, and it does not need a battery for listening.
• Best for a steel headband and soft ear pads → JVC HAS160A. Those are listed design features, though fit comfort is personal.
• Best for voice chat while gaming → JBL Tune 510BT, with a caveat. It has a microphone, but the listed information does not promise gaming-specific voice-chat performance or low latency.
The phrase “multipoint head phones for mobile gaming” also deserves a careful distinction here. The JBL is described as able to switch between two devices, which is useful if you alternate between a phone and another device. The product information does not establish that it maintains simultaneous audio connections in the way some shoppers mean by multipoint, so I would not assume that behavior.
My Verdict
I’d buy the JBL Tune 510BT for mobile gaming because its Bluetooth connection, two-device switching, built-in microphone, and long stated battery life make it the more flexible everyday pick.
The JVC HAS160A is the sensible alternative if I wanted a cable-based setup, a flat-folding design, and no charging routine.
Neither is a dedicated gaming headset, so I would not treat either as a sure bet for latency-sensitive play or advanced noise control.
For someone asking for the best headset for mobile gaming between these two, my choice is the JBL, with the microphone and connection limits in mind.
For a wireless setup, I’d choose the JBL: it connects by Bluetooth, has a built-in microphone, and is listed for up to 40 hours of battery life. The JVC is a reasonable wired option if your device supports its 3.5 mm plug, but it has no listed microphone.
Neither model lists active noise cancellation. The JVC’s soft ear pads are described as helping isolate sound, while the JBL lists no noise control. That does not make either a substitute for headphones specifically designed with ANC.
The stated connection type for the HAS160A is wired, with a 3.5 mm jack. Although Bluetooth appears in one product-information field, the product’s connection details do not establish Bluetooth listening, so I would treat it as a wired headphone.
Value depends on what you need, and I can’t determine that without current pricing. Check the current price on Amazon: the JBL offers Bluetooth, a microphone, device switching, and a rechargeable battery; the JVC offers a wired connection, flat-folding design, 30 mm drivers, and a steel headband.
• BEARTWO Headset vs Rhyfell Bone Conduction Headphones
• BlueFire 3.5mm vs Kidrox ® Dinosaur Headphones
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.