If you want wireless freedom, long battery life, and two-device switching for mobile gaming, choose JBL Tune 510BT; if you need simple wired headphones with a detachable cable, choose JVC HAS180. For most mobile gamers, I’d pick the JBL: it avoids a cable running to your phone and can play wirelessly for up to 40 hours. The JVC is the straightforward alternative if you specifically want a wired connection.
JBL Tune 510BT vs JVC HAS180 at a Glance
• JVC HAS180: A wired 3.5 mm connection and detachable cable; the trade-off is that it does not offer Bluetooth or a stated battery life.
• JBL Tune 510BT is for: mobile gamers who want wireless listening, long stretches between charges, and the option to move between a game device and phone.
• JVC HAS180 is for: listeners who prefer a direct wired connection and want a detachable cable.
• My quick call: I’d choose the JBL for mobile gaming flexibility and the JVC for a no-battery-needed wired setup.
The JBL Tune 510BT is an on-ear Bluetooth headphone built around wireless listening and convenience. Its headline practical advantage is up to 40 hours of battery life. JBL also says a full recharge takes about two hours, while a five-minute charge can add two hours of listening. That makes it easier to plan around a long commute, a trip, or several gaming sessions without needing to recharge after every use.
For mobile gaming, the wireless connection means there is no headphone cable to manage while holding a phone. Another useful detail is its ability to switch between two Bluetooth devices. If you use one device for a game and another for calls or media, that flexibility may suit your routine. The headphones also have a microphone on the ear cup for calls, plus buttons for managing audio and calls. An adjustable headband and soft ear cushions are intended to make the fit more comfortable over longer listening periods.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-17 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
I’d consider the JBL if you want wireless headphones that can also handle calls and you value long battery life. Its foldable design is another practical touch for carrying it between home and work. I’d skip it if you want a wired option, or if you require active noise cancellation: the listed noise control is none. The product information also does not establish a gaming-specific low-latency mode, so I wouldn’t assume it has one.
The JVC HAS180 takes the simpler route: it is a wired, on-ear headphone with a 3.5 mm jack and a detachable cable. You don’t need to manage a headphone battery or pair it over Bluetooth. For someone who prefers a physical connection to a compatible device, that straightforward setup can be the main appeal.
Its listed features are spare compared with the JBL’s. JVC describes the headphones as lightweight and bass-oriented, and the product information lists a dynamic driver and a frequency range of 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz. A detachable cable may make storage and transport easier than dealing with a permanently attached one, though it is still a wired design. The supplied information does not list Bluetooth, a microphone, battery life, or two-device switching.
I’d choose the JVC if you want a basic wired headphone and your gaming device has a compatible 3.5 mm connection. It can also suit someone who would rather not keep another device charged. I’d pass if your priority is moving freely without a cable, switching between a phone and another device, or taking calls through a listed built-in microphone. The JVC’s specifications also don’t support treating it as an ANC headphone; the listed control information is not enough to establish active noise cancellation as a feature.
• Best for wireless mobile gaming → JBL Tune 510BT. Bluetooth means no cable connecting the headphones to your phone while you play.
• Best for long listening between charges → JBL Tune 510BT. It is specified for up to 40 hours of battery life, with a stated two-hour recharge time.
• Best for a wired 3.5 mm connection → JVC HAS180. That is the connection type listed for the JVC; the JBL is wireless.
• Best for avoiding headphone battery management → JVC HAS180. Its wired design does not depend on a headphone battery.
• Best for calls and voice-assistant access → JBL Tune 510BT. It has an ear-cup microphone and can activate Siri or Hey Google through a button.
• Best for a detachable cable → JVC HAS180. That feature suits someone who wants a cable that can be removed for storage.
• Best fit for a request for “multipoint head phones for mobile gaming” → JBL Tune 510BT, with a caveat. It switches between two devices, but the supplied details do not specify a simultaneous multipoint connection or a gaming latency feature.
Searches for “anc bone conduction headphones for mobile gaming” may point to a very different kind of product than either of these. Neither set of listed features establishes bone conduction, and the JBL’s noise control is explicitly listed as none. I would not choose either on the assumption that it provides active noise cancellation. If blocking outside sound or a bone-conduction design is essential, these two options do not answer that need based on the information available.
My Verdict
I’d buy the JBL Tune 510BT for mobile gaming because wireless listening, two-device switching, and up to 40 hours of battery life make it the more flexible everyday option. Its microphone and call controls add useful phone functionality beyond gaming. I’d choose the JVC only if I specifically wanted a wired 3.5 mm headphone with a detachable cable. Neither should be treated as a gaming headset with confirmed ANC or a specified low-latency mode.
I’d pick the JBL Tune 510BT if you want Bluetooth and no cable running to your phone. The JVC HAS180 is the wired choice, provided your device has a compatible 3.5 mm connection.
No. Its listed noise control is none, so I would not buy it expecting active noise cancellation. The supplied JVC details do not establish ANC as a feature either.
It can switch between two Bluetooth devices, according to its listed features. That does not, by itself, confirm simultaneous multipoint playback or describe how switching behaves in every setup.
Check the current price on Amazon before deciding; the right value depends on what each costs when you shop. On features alone, the JBL offers more wireless and battery convenience, while the JVC keeps things simple with a detachable wired cable.
• in ear earbuds for college students
• GEEKRIA Silicone Case Cover vs Vikye B28: Cheap TWS Earbuds
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.