My friend and I are working on a Python Game using turtles. Our issue is in the section where it defines the turtles. We are trying to speed each turtle up, but when we do, the default speed runs. Why is this issue occurring?
As far as I can tell, you temporarily speed up the turtles on operations that don't get much out of it, e.g. left() but leave the turtles in slow speed for operations that should benefit from it, e.g. motion()
Joy Overflow Speed Up Mp3 Download
Download File 🔥 https://urluss.com/2y68a5 🔥
I'd suggest you pull out all your speed() calls and rethink them, preferably using the string arguments "slowest", "slow", "normal", "fast" & "fastest" to help document what you're doing and avoid going out of range.
Furthermore, you can radically speed up your MATCH function by using the Binary version of it. Have a read of -much-faster-is-the-double-vlookup-trick/ and also try to minimise the amount of individual transfers you do across the Excel/VBA divide by either performing the lookups entirely within the Excel sheet (by using VBA to write the formula in the sheet and execute it there) or by bringing all the data into VBA in one go using variant arrays, performing your logic, and then by dumping it back in one go. Google "Efficient way to transfer data between Excel and VBA" or something similar. Also check out any articles from Charles Williams on the subject.
And in an instant, it generated an answer in less than a second and the answer was correct. Given that most users post to Stack Overflow and don't even get an answer to their question, this could be a relief to most users who experience this and would discourage anyone plagiarizing code from OpenAI and pasting it here to gain reputation. But technology is advancing and we are becoming more and more independent of human skill to find solutions to programming challenges. Some high reputation contributors ignore questions deliberately but openchat gpt came to save the day. The speed and the accuracy of OpenAI responses are what gives it an edge over Stack Overflow and then users won't get banned or question limit imposed on users based on time intervals. Your thoughts and views on this matter are welcome, could openchat GPT be the end of Stack Overflow?
The speed of the response generation of the service you used is indeed impressive, although I wouldn't say it's necessarily much faster than using a search engine like Google and clicking on the presented link to Stack Overflow, for example.
I just had an argument with a colleague of mine and thought I'd just reach out to the experts on this. Here's the scenario. We were using a website that measures your connection's speed. We tested using a server that is far from us (We are in Malaysia and the server was in US). It was around 2 Mbps. Then we tried with a server in Singapore and it was much faster (around 15 Mbps). My colleague believed it's because of the physical distance while I don't think it matters. My understanding is once you have done the initial handshake and the data flow has started, it doesn't matter where the server is located and the result should be almost the same. Am I missing something here? How does it really work?
FYI, some speed test websites use parallel TCP streams to increase throughput; this may be affecting the results you see, because parallel TCP streams dramatically increase throughput in case you have some packet-loss in the path. I have seen four parallel TCP streams completely saturate a 5Mbps cable modem that suffered from 1% constant packet loss. Normally 1% loss would lower the throughput of a single TCP stream.
Strongly simplified, the longer the distance, the more "hops" are involved on the way through the Internet. The maximum bandwidth is determined by the slowest hop and concurring traffic. With increasing distance and a somewhat random distribution of hop speeds, the probability for getting slower overall speeds is increasing. Additionally, physics gets in the way and increasing latency may also slow down the link.
Of course, this is oversimplified but in reality, this situation is what you very often find. And then again you don't when there's a surprisingly fast connection or a distribution proxy just around the corner - but when everything's instant we rarely think about the speed of the Internet...
City officials say that without outside assistance, rates could triple, and that engineering constraints make it virtually impossible to speed up work beyond the current 2035 completion date, a timeline they point out was heavily negotiated during the General Assembly session two years ago.
In these systems, which were constructed in the 19th century, runoff from storms and sewage flow through the same pipes. When weather conditions are normal, everything in the pipes ends up at the wastewater treatment plant. But when there is heavy rain, the system can become overwhelmed and send both stormwater and untreated sewage into the river at overflow points called outfalls.
The financial needs in Richmond are also far greater. Various commitments by the legislature would funnel $150 million to Richmond for combined sewer overflow work, and the city intends to put up a matching amount.
I'm creating a data-logger system which logs data in SD card at a high speed of about 20000-30000 bytes per second. But the SD library in arduino currently writes data at about 4500-5000 bytes per second which is too slow.
If you just want to have a good hash function, and cannot wait, djb2 is one of the best string hash functions i know. It has excellent distribution and speed on many different sets of keys and table sizes
In fact, their speed can be a problem sometimes. In particular, a common technique for storing a password-derived token is to run a standard fast hash algorithm 10,000 times (storing the hash of the hash of the hash of the hash of the ... password).
As you are buying a new cassette and front chainring, the cost of upgrading the entire kit would be money well spend. Have a look at third party manufacturers such as Microshift (Advent range). These do not offer the XTR level performance, but will easily exceed the performance of an old XT 9speed on a 11-46 cassette.
If you can afford it, I'd suggest a new cassette and rear mech specifically able to cope with the wide range. You could also get an extra gear by switching to 10 speed, but then you definitely need a new shifter too. A new chain will be required, but your existing narrow-wide chainring should be okay.
Two reasons. Firstly, 1x drivetrains generally have the same small sprocket as 3x drivetrains. Thus, to be able to go at any decent speed, the chainring has to be large too. The only way you can climb up hills with a big chainring is that the largest sprocket is very big. This requires a rear derailleur that supports such big sprockets in a cassette. Any 3x rear derailleur has limited big sprocket size. The capacity would be enough (usually 3x drivetrains have around 1:1 as the lowest gear, so for example 28T-38T-48T and 11-28T has 4.36x difference in largest and smallest gear, and to approximate that you'd get something like 11-46T and 46T chainring which requires 35T capacity, very similar to 37T capacity of the 3x system), but the slant parallelogram in the rear derailleur needs to be more slanted to support big rear sprockets.
The above Stumpy has a 2x10 drivetrain, 34-24 front, 11-36t cassette. Shifters are Shimano SLX 10 speed, with the left being able to switch from 3x to 2x. My gearing ranges from a low of 0.66 to a 3.06 high. Your proposed 1x gearing is 0.8 low 2.90 high in comparison. The broader range is one reason I like 2x. Mountain front derailleurs can be sourced for little of nothing these days, and set-up, shifting and shift patterns is easier than ever. I typically ride the big ring exclusively, but either way there is no chain rub and despite the cross chaining, this isn't such an issue these days with 2x systems and narrower, flexible chains made better with wear and friction reducing materials. Also the large-large cross chaining, which is common with a 2x mountain system is the lesser evil anyway.
Arguably, two things are necessary for a 1x system to function with any degree of acceptable performance: a narrow-wide chainring and a clutched rear derailleur. Due, in part, to the chain guide action of the front derailleur's cage being absent in 1x, chain retention is a necessary consideration for these systems. The narrow wide ring prevents side to side movements of the chain that can lead to derailment. The clutched rear derailleur has a setting that prevents movement of the derailleur cage when the bike encounters bumpy terrain, thus preventing the chain from becoming momentarily slack. As has been pointed out, the RD-M750 lacks this capability. In addition, Shimano trickles down the technology developed at the highest, XTR, level of components to the mid-range line up in fairly quick succession. Thus, today's Deore lineup was yesterday's XT/XTR as evidenced by Deore being 12 speed with Shadow+ design derailleur's initially only offered at the XTR level. Point here is the older XT derailleur, while still decent in quality and performance, won't keep pace with the new Deore. I can attest first hand that the M750, which I owned, failed in an experiment when I was feeling out turning a hardtail into a 1x with a chain guide and 11-40t 9 speed cassette from SunRace. It couldn't climb the chain onto the large cog even with the B-adjust bolt turned around (for maximum length to create maximum distance between the cage's jockey wheel and the cassette's large cog). One could use a goat link or like product to extend this gap, but you'd still lack the clutch and have trouble getting the 11 tooth cog to work. 17dc91bb1f
mirage movie hindi dubbed download