Now that the trailer is out, there's no escaping it. We're officially in the Joker: Folie Deux era. The movie is still a few months away, but fans of the story have been waiting for this sequel ever since it was first announced all the way back in 2019. The story will chronicle Arthur Fleck's (Joaquin Phoenix) journey after the deadly events he put in motion in the first movie. Now, he'll meet Harley Quinn (Lady Gaga) and they'll have a romantic and mutually destructive relationship.
The new images underscore that the visuals will once again be a standout in the movie. It looks like we'll get a repeat of the staircase dancing scene, but it's possible that the Joker 2 team will also try to outdo it in some way. Musical moments have already been teased, and considering Gaga's background, this might be the most musical version of Harley Quinn that we'll get.
Joker Images
Download Zip 🔥 https://bltlly.com/2yGciq 🔥
It's also great that director Todd Phillips returned to helm the sequel. He once again partnered up with Scott Silver (8 Mile) to write the script, so this suggests the team was committed to coming together to deliver a sequel worthy of the original.
Should Joker: Folie Deux repeat the success of its previous installments, it would be the type of movie that brings cinephiles and casual viewers together. The first one was not only a box office hit, with over a billion dollars raked in at the global box office, but it also received eleven Oscar nominations, and earned Phoenix a statue for his performance.
Director Todd Phillips has revealed new images from Joker: Folie Deux, which provide a closer look at Joaquin Phoenix's Joker and Lady Gaga's Harley Quinn. Despite being developed as a standalone project, the massive success of 2019's Joker made the production of a sequel inevitable. Now categorized as a DC Elseworlds project, taking place adjacent to the rebooted DC Universe, Joker: Folie Deux is scheduled for release on October 4, 2024. After Joker became the highest-grossing R-rated movie of all time, and earned several notable accolades, there are hopes that its highly-anticipated 2024 sequel can match its success.
To celebrate Valentine's Day, Joker and Joker: Folie Deux director Todd Phillips shared new images from the upcoming sequel. Joaquin Phoenix and Lady Gaga are put front-and-center as DC's most twisted romantic partnership, Arthur Fleck's Joker and Harley Quinn, as Phillips delivers the message, "Hoping your day is full of love." Lady Gaga was confirmed to be joining Joker: Folie Deux's cast in 2022, set to deliver a grounded version of the Joker's infamous partner-in-crime. Joker: Folie Deux will explore a very different story to its 2019 predecessor, focusing on the Joker and Harley Quinn's destructive connection.
Following Lady Gaga's casting in Joker: Folie Deux, speculation began to emerge suggesting the project could be inspired by movie musicals, giving Gaga the chance to show her full range of talents. While it's unlikely the upcoming film will be all-singing, all-dancing, Joker: Folie Deux will be adopting a different style to 2019's Joker, and this has been glimpsed in the new images released by Phillips. Among them, Arthur Fleck and Harley Quinn can be seen dancing on a rooftop in classic ballroom attire, though with a sinister twist, as Fleck is in full make-up as the Joker.
Last fall, I spoke at the University of Oregon about the role of popular and participatory culture in the American Presidential campaign. Many of the ideas in that talk had taken shape through this blog. For example, here's a post which looked at the role of photoshop mash-ups in shaping how the public responded to the announcement of Sarah Palen as McCain's VP candidate. I also made passing reference in this talk to a discussion of the Anonymous movement which one of my graduate students posted on this blog.In the audience for the talk was a PhD candidate Whitney Phillips who is doing research on transgressive humor on the internet with particular focus on the group 4Chan. This past week, she shared with me a thought piece she had drafted about some recent images of Obama which are making their rounds online and have been deployed on both the left and the right in response to current debates about health care. In the piece below, Whitney Phillips dissects where these images come from and the different ways they have been deployed as they have circulated across the web. It's a compelling case study of the politics of spreadable media.
A few weeks ago, a photoshopped image of President Obama surfaced online. In it, Obama is presented as Heath Ledger's Joker, complete with ghastly, blood-stained grimace and spooky blackened eyes. The image, which is disturbing enough on its own, is accompanied by the word "socialism," begging the question--who created this, and why?
So far, no one seems to know the answer. Rightwing bloggers insist that the image proves Obama's growing unpopularity. Tammy Bruce, a conservative radio host, tagged the photo with an almost audibly giddy caption proclaiming that "You know B. Hussein is in trouble when... "; on conservative blog Atlas Shrugs, the photo is filed under "The Worm Turns," complete with emoticon smiley-face .
In liberal circles, the Obama/Joker image is causing much more consternation. According to Philip Kennicott of the Washington Post, the poster equates Obama with everything that is dangerous and unpredictable within the urban landscape, and by extension, links the President to all those dark bodies that threaten the purity of some Palin-approved "real" America. Forget the ghoulish whiteness of the Joker's makeup; forget the apparent claim that Obama is a socialist; according to Kennicott, the take-away point is that Obama is quite literally a wolf in sheep's clothing.
That said, there is one point of agreement. No one knows who the culprit might be, leaving both sides quite puzzled. In an era of democratized fame, in which infamy is little more than a mouse click away, why wouldn't the artist take credit? Is he/she afraid to be outed as a Secret Republican? Is he/she lying low, as Patrick Courrielche suggests, to shield him/herself from the wrath of an Obama-worshipping art world? Or is it something else, something more sinister?
The answer to this riddle can be found on 4chan, an enormously popular--and much maligned--image board home to gamers and trolls. And, most significantly, to Anonymous, a loosely-organized Internet hive-mind responsible for, among other things, the hacking of Sarah Palin's personal email account and myriad attacks against the Church of Scientology. Intimate knowledge of this group is not necessary to feeling its influence; generally speaking, whenever an internet meme reaches critical mass, it is safe to assume that Anonymous had something to do with it.
Such is the case with the Obama/Joker image. When The Dark Knight was released in 2008, Anonymous immediately embraced the film and generated a veritable fleet of new memes. In one, several stills of Batman and the Joker are superimposed with the phrase "I just accidentally a Coca-Cola bottle is this bad"; in another, a particularly unflattering shot of Christian Bale is offset by the seemingly nonsensical claim that "this is why we can't have nice things."
Most notably, however, Anonymous became obsessed with and delighted by an early viral ad campaign that featured one of the first official images of Heath Ledger's Joker. His head twisted like a psychopathic rag doll, the Joker has just scrawled the phrase "why so serious?" in what appears to be blood. Anonymous collectively revved up its photoshop engines, sparing very few targets. A simple search of the phrase "why so serious" on Encyclopedia Dramatica, Anonymous' unofficial archive, reveals the full extent of this meme, as cats , babies , Miley Cyrus and even Al Gore (modified slightly to read "why so cereal") have all been given the "Joker treatment."
It shouldn't be surprising, then, that images of Obama as the Joker have been in circulation since before the election; it was only a matter of time before some clever Anon incorporated the Wingnut/ Birther/Teabag contingent into the joke.
It is impossible to know how and when "Why so socialist?" was replaced by the simpler "socialism." Perhaps a Rightwing blogger encountered the original image somewhere, assumed the author was playing for his team, and tweaked the message in the name of clarity and/or font size. A more likely possibility, however, is that this image is the handiwork of some Anonymous troll who did it for the "lulz," a term trolls and gamers use to indicate shenanigans. A corruption of "lol," "lulz" is a kind of laughter associated with deliberate trickery. The more confusion one causes, the more "lulz" he/she earns; in the case of the Obama/Joker poster, the lulz have been epic.
Still, the question remains--what are we to make of this controversy? What does the image really mean? What were the author's intentions? So far, all evidence points to Anonymous; Anonymous is less concerned with politics than with controversy; more likely than not, the original artist wasn't trying to do anything, meaning there's a very real chance that the Obama/Joker image is in itself meaningless. This is not to say, however, that the context is meaningless, or that the image is worthless. Quite the contrary, in fact--just because we can't affix objective meaning to a given cultural artifact doesn't mean there is nothing to learn. Indeed, I would argue that what something actually says is less important than what it does.
In this case, the Obama/Joker poster elicits one of two reactions. The Birther crowd, for example, has taken particular interest in--and, amusingly, credit for--the Obama/Joker image. Their argument is simple: Obama is trying to destroy the country with Socialism, just like the Joker destroyed Gotham City. Of course, the Joker failed, but that's beside the point--to a Birther hell-bent on discrediting the Obama administration, the Joker image is just what the doctor ordered. Furthermore, because the image was plastered all over Los Angeles a la Shepard Fairey's "Hope" poster, Rightwing bloggers have tried to package its existence as an organized, grassroots effort to contest Obama's so-called Socialist agenda. Of course, there is no solid evidence to corroborate this assumption--the image may have been posted onto Conservative blogs, but that's the extent of the connection. This, however, is the narrative they have chosen to adopt. 152ee80cbc
daydream regular font free download
purble place ios free download