Anesthesia Guidelines 

for ICD Implant


K o r i   M a r t o d a m ' s   D o c t o r a t e  P r o j e c t   w i t h   J o h n s   H o p k i n s   U n i v e r s i t y

P l e a s e   p a r t i c i p a t e   i n   a l l   3   s t e p s :
         1. Take the Pretest
   2. Use these resources for an ICD implant/revision

Table of Contents

Project Overview

Purpose

The resources on this website were gathered as an acknowledgement of the nuanced fragility of heart failure patients receiving Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICDs) in the Swedish EP Lab. Drawing on feedback from clinical practice combined with a comprehensive literature review, these resources reflect evidence-based best practice in patient assessment, anesthesia planning, intraoperative management, and patient recovery. They are offered as a reference to all anesthesia providers in EP, but aim specifically to support Care Teams, providers new to Swedish, those infrequently staffed in the EP Lab regarding optimal resource utilization and to inform meaningful conversations regarding patient-centered care. 


Methodology

In 2021, a comprehensive search of the literature utilizing Whittemore and Knafl’s (2005) integrative review methodology, was focused on the question: “What anesthesia techniques are currently being used for adult Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) surgeries in the Electrophysiology (EP) Lab?”. Databases searched included CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus yielding 2,110 articles then filtered for relevance and publication date of 2016 or after. Ten full-text articles met review inclusion criteria including: Study populations comprised of adult patients with advanced heart failure necessitating transvenous ICD implant, research focus on providing anesthesia for the ICD implant procedure, and quantitative or descriptive procedural outcome measures related to successful perioperative patient management. 

Analysis and synthesis of the review results yielded three central themes: 

Secondary themes include an emphasis on individualized care for patients with co-morbidities (Cheruku et al., 2018; Gerstein et al., 2016; Yildiz et al., 2018) and the cardiorespiratory and hemodynamic instability associated with propofol use (Gerstein et al., 2016; Mandel et al., 2017; Ugata et al., 2019). 

Representing contemporary best practice for sedation, the "2018 American Society of Anesthesiologist Practice Guidelines for Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia" (ASA, 2018) was selected as the foundational document for this website, and adapted with permission for use in the Swedish EP Lab. 

The ASA developed this chart as part of the 2018 Practice Guidelines for Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia to help anesthesia providers define depths of sedation and distinguish between states where the pt is responsive (Conscious and Moderate Sedation) and states where the patient is responsive to significant stimuli or unresponsive (Deep Sedation and General Anesthesia). 

Click for Chart

2018 ASA Sedation Guidelines

These practice parameters are a digest of the American Society of Anesthesiologists 2018 Practice Guidelines for Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia. The full Guidelines can be found here. 


ONE: PATIENT EVALUATION

                           a.     Extremes of age

   b.     ASA status III or higher

   c.     Respiratory conditions, OSA, respiratory distress syndrome, allergies

   d.     Obesity, history of gastric bypass surgery

   e.     Psychotropic drug use, long-term benzodiazepine use

    f.     Cardiovascular disorders

 

TWO: PREPROCEDURE PATIENT PREPARATION

    a.     A current Echocardiogram

    b.     ECG in last 12 months

    c.     BMP in last 6 months

    d.     Repeat BMP (minimum K+) DOS if IV contrast will be used for a vascular visualization 

  2.   Consider length of procedure, patient position, and the amount of strain that becoming  

        obstructed or hypercarbic may put on the cardiopulmonary system

  3.   Consult with a medical specialist when appropriate (i.e., EF < 20%). See Specialist Contact List     at bottom of homepage

 

THREE: MONITORING

   1. Level of Consciousness

a.     Assess level of consciousness including responsiveness to commands or other              bidirectional communication q5 min

   2.    Ventilation and Oxygenation

a. Monitoring pt ventilation and oxygenation via quantitative clinical signs, capnography,         and pulse oximetry 

   3.    Hemodynamic Monitoring

a. Including BP q3-5 min, HR, EKG

4.     Be prepared to rescue pt from sedation deeper than level intended

a.     Manage hypoventilation or airway compromise

b.   Support cardiovascular function in patients who become hypo/hypertensive or tachy/bradycardic

 

FOUR: SUPPLEMENTAL OXYGEN

1.     Literature findings show supplemental O2 associated with reduced frequency of hypoxemia.

       These organizations strongly agree with the recommendation to use supplemental O2: 

a.     American Society of Anesthesiologists 

b.     American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 

c.     American Society of Dentist Anesthesiologists 

 

FIVE: EMERGENCY SUPPORT

1.     Pharmacologic antagonists for benzodiazepines & opiates on hand

2.     Individual present who understands pharmacology of sedatives, analgesics, and their   interaction with other meds pt may be taking

3.     Equipment for establishing patent airway

4.     Individual capable of establishing a patent airway

5.     Functional defibrillator or AED

6.     Individual or service (e.g., code team) with ACLS skills immediately available

 

SIX: SEDATIVES AND ANALGESICS NOT INTENDED FOR GENERAL ANESTHESIA

                        (Benzodiazepines, Dexmedetomidine, Opiates)

1.     Combinations of sedative and analgesic agents may be administered as appropriate for the 

       procedure and the condition of the patient.

 a.     Administer each component individually to achieve the desired effect (e.g., analgesics

    to relieve pain; sedatives to decrease awareness or anxiety)

2.     Dexmedetomidine can be administered as an alternative to benzodiazepine sedatives on a 

        case-by-case basis   

3.     Administer IV sedative/analgesic drugs in small, incremental doses or by infusion, titrating

        to desired endpoints

 a.     Allow sufficient time between doses so peak effect can be assessed before  

         subsequent drug administration

 b.     Consider maintaining IV access for patients receiving non-IV sedation and/or       

         analgesia 

 

SEVEN: SEDATIVE AND ANALGESIC MEDICATIONS INTENDED FOR GENERAL ANESTHESIA

                        (Propofol, Ketamine, Etomidate)

1.     When moderate procedural sedation is provided with sedative/analgesic medications       intended for general anesthesia, provide care consistent with that required for general   anesthesia  

2.     Assure that practitioners administering sedative/analgesic medications intended for GA can     identify and rescue patients from unintended deep sedation or general anesthesia

 

EIGHT: REVERSAL AGENTS

1.     Assure specific antagonists are immediately available whenever opioid analgesic or    benzodiazepines are administered for procedural sedation/analgesia

2.     If pts develop hypoxemia, significant hypoventilation, or apnea during sedation/analgesia:

 a.     Encourage or physically stimulate patients to breathe deeply

 b.     Administer supplemental oxygen (if not already in place)

 c.     Provide positive pressure ventilation if spontaneous ventilation is inadequate

3.     Use reversal agents in cases where airway control, spontaneous ventilation, or positive pressure ventilation is inadequate:

 a.     Flumazenil

 b.     Naloxone

 

NINE: RECOVERY CARE

1.     Observe and monitor patients until they return to near-baseline level of consciousness and           are no longer at risk for cardiorespiratory depression

2.     Monitor oxygenation continuously (pulse oximetry) and ventilation and circulation at        regular intervals until patients are suitable for discharge

 

TEN: CREATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PATIENT SAFETY PROCESSES

1.     Create a quality improvement process based on established national, regional, or institutional reporting protocols (e.g., adverse events, unsatisfactory sedation)

2.     Strengthen patient safety culture through collaborative practices (e.g., team training, simulation drills, development and implementation of checklists)

3.     Create an emergency response plan

Sourced from Swedish Pharmacy, Swedish Heart Surgery Postop and Sedation & Ventilation order sets, and various chapters & drug guide from Morgan & Mikhail’s Clinical Anesthesiology, 7e (2022). 


PECS Block 

In 2011, Blanco et al. presented the Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS Block) as an effective regional anesthetic for breast surgery. Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of regional techniques for transvascular subclavian chest wall procedures (Ince et al., 2020; Mavarez et al., 2019; Renzini et al., 2020) and a growing body of evidence supports the use of PECS and similar regional techniques for ICD implant (Arasu et al., 2020; Bozyel et al., 2019; Metinyurt, 2021; Wang et al., 2020). Regional anesthesia can be accomplished without the use of systemic sedative agents, thereby limiting impacts on physiologic homeostasis and patient memory (Sprung et al., 2019).


NYSORA PECS Block Website 

Specialist Contact List

Kori Martodam, CRNA

Nurse Anesthetist and Doctor of Nursing Practice Candidate, 2023

Page by name via AMS Connect


Dr. John Mignone

Director of Swedish Heart Failure Management Clinic

Text or call 206-419-4271


Dr. Wendy Pabich

Cardiac Anesthesiologist and Project Advisor

Page by name via AMS Connect


Dr. Juan Pulido

Cardiac Anesthesiologist and CVICU Intensivist

Page by name via AMS Connect


Dr. Oliver Small

Anesthesiologist and CVICU Intensivist

Page by name via AMS Connect

 





Q u e s t i o n s   o r   c o m m e n t s ?   C o n t a c t   K o r i :

 [   k o r i . m a r t o d a m @ g m a i l . c o m   ]

 References

Adrenergic agonists & antagonists. Butterworth IV J.F., & Mackey D.C., & Wasnick J.D.(Eds.), (2022). Morgan & Mikhail’s Clinical Anesthesiology, 7e. McGraw Hill. https://accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=3194&sectionid=266518784

American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters. (2018). Practice guidelines for moderate procedural sedation and analgesia 2018. Anesthesiology, 128(3), 437–479. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002043

Anesthesia for patients with cardiovascular disease. Butterworth IV J.F., & Mackey D.C., & Wasnick J.D.(Eds.), (2022). Morgan & Mikhail’s Clinical Anesthesiology, 7e. McGraw Hill. https://accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=3194&sectionid=266519681

Arasu, T., Ragavendran, S., Nagaraja, P.S., Singh, N.G., Vikram, M.N., & Basappanavar V.S. (2020). Comparison of pectoral nerve (PECS1) block with combined PECS1 and transversus thoracis muscle (TTM) block in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device insertion—A pilot study. Ann Card Anaesth, 23(2), 165–169. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_254_18

Blanco R. (2011). The 'pecs block': a novel technique for providing analgesia after breast surgery. Anaesthesia, 66(9), 847–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06838.x

Blanco, R. & Barrington, M. (2022, August 20). Pectoralis and serratus plane nerve blocks. New York School Of Regional Anesthesia. https://www.nysora.com/topics/regional-anesthesia-for-specific-surgical-procedures/thorax/pectoralis-serratus-plane-blocks/

Bozyel S., Yalnız A., Aksu T., Guler T.E., & Genez S. (2019). Ultrasound-guided combined pectoral nerve block and axillary venipuncture for the implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 42(7), 1026–1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.13725

Ince, M. E., Sir, E., Eksert, S., Ors, N., & Ozkan, G. (2020). Analgesic effectiveness of ultrasound-guided pecs II block in central venous port catheter implantation. JPR, Volume 13, 1185–1191. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S258692

Intravenous anesthetics. Butterworth IV J.F., & Mackey D.C., & Wasnick J.D.(Eds.), (2022). Morgan & Mikhail’s Clinical Anesthesiology, 7e. McGraw Hill. https://accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=3194&sectionid=266518173

Kaya, E., Südkamp, H., Lortz, J., Rassaf, T., & Jánosi, R.A. (2018). Feasibility and safety of using local anaesthesia with conscious sedation during complex cardiac implantable electronic device procedures. Sci Rep, 8(1), 7103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25457-x

Mavarez, A. C., Ripat, C. I., & Suarez, M. R. (2019). Pectoralis plane block for pacemaker insertion: A successful primary anesthetic. Front. Surg., 6, 64. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2019.00064

Metinyurt, H.F., Sugur ,T., Kavakli, A.S., & Cagirci, G. (2021). Clavipectoral fascial plane block for implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. J Clin Anesth, 71, 110197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110197

Pai, B.H.P., Shariat, A.N., & Bhatt, H.V. (2019). PECS block for an ICD implantation in the super obese patient. J Clin Anesth, 57, 110–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.04.003

Renzini, M., Ripani, U., Golia, L., Nisi, F., & Gori, F. (2020). Pectoralis (PecS) nerve block 1 for port-a-cath removal and central venous catheter (CVC) replacement. Medicinski Glasnik Ljekarske Komore Zenicko-Dobojskog Kantona, 2. https://doi.org/10.17392/1158-20

Sprung, J., Schulte, P. J., Knopman, D. S., Mielke, M. M., Petersen, R. C., Weingarten, T. N., Martin, D. P., Hanson, A. C., Schroeder, D. R., & Warner, D. O. (2019). Cognitive function after surgery with regional or general anesthesia: A population-based study. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 15(10), 1243–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2019.06.4949

Swedish Anesthesia Group. (2022). Heart Surgery Ventilation & Sedation Order Set [Order set]. Swedish Medical Center EPIC Resources.

Swedish Anesthesia Group. (2022). Heart Surgery Postop Order Set [Order set]. Swedish Medical Center EPIC Resources.

Ugata Y, Michihata N, Matsui H, Fushimi K, & Yasunaga H. (2020). Periprocedural hypotension after conscious sedation versus local anesthesia during defibrillator implantation for left ventricular dysfunction: Analysis of a national inpatient database in Japan. Heart Vessels, 35(1), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-019-01462-6

Wang, Y., Chandran, R., Woon, K., Chang, S., Quek, H., Singh, P., Tan, P., Yeo, C., Wong, K., Tong, K., & et al. (2020). A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial on patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation with local anaesthesia and sedation with and without pectoral nerve block (CN-02244918). 41(SUPPL 2), 776‐. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0776

Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of

advanced nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x