Effect on volume of exports
Effect on Boeing orders by country group
Effect on relative wage of women - primary earners vs. non-primary earners
Median distance between borrower and lender
Impulse response of likelihood of conflict to an increase in military spending
How do financial frictions shape firm investment in intangible capital? We answer this question by exploiting an investment tax subsidy in Portugal that reduced the cost of investing in both intangible and physical capital while keeping their relative price unchanged. Using firm-level data, we find that treated firms reduced their physical-to-intangible capital ratio by 11 percent, with the effect being stronger for small and financially constrained firms. The entire decline can be attributed to a loosening of financial frictions. We develop a model in which firms face borrowing constraints: intangible capital must be financed with internal cash as they cannot be used as collateral, while physical capital can be financed with debt. As a result, constrained firms over-invest in physical capital and under-invest in intangibles. The subsidy alleviates these constraints, enabling firms to reallocate investment toward intangibles. Moreover, we show that the subsidy reduces misallocation, bringing firms closer to their unconstrained capital mix. Our findings highlight the role of financial frictions in slowing the transition to an intangible-intensive production structure and in perpetuating input misallocation.
[Cite]