If you want wireless freedom, long battery life, and Bluetooth convenience for PC, choose JBL Tune 510BT; if you need a wired connection and inline controls, choose JLab Neon on-Ear. For a desk setup where charging and wireless pairing are hassles you would rather avoid, JLab has a practical advantage. For extended listening without a cable, JBL is the stronger fit.
• JBL Tune 510BT strength: Wireless Bluetooth listening, two-device switching, and up to 40 hours of battery life. Trade-off: It needs charging and has no headphone jack.
• JLab Neon on-Ear strength: A wired 3.5 mm connection, inline microphone and controls, and a foldable design. Trade-off: The cable limits movement, and it does not offer Bluetooth.
• JBL Tune 510BT is for: Someone who wants wireless listening, long stretches between charges, and easy movement between a computer and phone.
• JLab Neon on-Ear is for: Someone who prefers a direct wired connection, wants controls on the cable, and does not want battery life to shape listening time.
The JBL Tune 510BT makes the clearest case for a person who wants to leave the headphone cable behind. It connects over Bluetooth and can switch between two devices, which is useful if you want to listen to something on your computer but still be able to pick up a call on your phone. The on-ear buttons handle sound and calls, and a multifunction button can activate Siri or Google Assistant on a connected device.
Its biggest practical advantage is battery life: JBL specifies up to 40 hours of wireless use. If you forget to recharge before a long work session, a five-minute charge is stated to add two hours of listening. A full recharge takes about two hours using the Type-C charging cable. Those details make the JBL a more convenient choice for people who want headphones ready for work, study, and entertainment without connecting a cable to their computer.
The Tune 510BT is still an on-ear model, not an over-ear design. That distinction matters if you are specifically shopping for over ear headphones for PC, since these sit on the ears rather than enclosing them. JBL lists no noise control, so I would not choose them expecting active noise cancellation or a feature intended to block surrounding sounds. They make more sense for someone who values wireless convenience and long battery life than for someone who needs a wired connection or noise-control features.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-19 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
JLab takes the straightforward route: the Neon connects through a 3.5 mm jack, with its microphone and controls built into the cable. That means there is no Bluetooth pairing and no headphone battery to recharge before listening. For a PC with a compatible headphone connection, plugging in is simple. The inline remote is designed for calls, track changes, and volume adjustments without reaching for the connected device.
The Neon has 40 mm drivers and a stated frequency range of 20 Hz to 20 kHz. JLab describes its sound as covering bass, mids, and highs, but those specifications alone do not establish how it will sound to every listener. Its folding construction, rotating ear cups, adjustable headband, and padded cushions are practical design details for someone who wants a wired pair that can be packed away between uses. It is an on-ear model, even though the product information also describes the ear cups as over-ear cups.
The trade-off is the cable. It can be a plus at a fixed desk, where there is no need to manage charging or wireless pairing, but it limits how far you can move from the computer. Unlike the JBL, the JLab is not a Bluetooth option and does not offer switching between two wireless devices. I would consider it for a stationary PC setup and skip it if the main goal is to walk around while listening.
• Best for wireless listening at a PC → JBL Tune 510BT. Bluetooth removes the cable between the headphones and computer.
• Best for avoiding headphone charging → JLab Neon on-Ear. Its wired 3.5 mm connection does not rely on a headphone battery.
• Best for long stretches between charges → JBL Tune 510BT. JBL specifies up to 40 hours of battery life, with a quick-charge feature for a short recharge.
• Best for switching between a computer and phone → JBL Tune 510BT. It can connect to two Bluetooth devices and switch between them.
• Best for cable-mounted call and track controls → JLab Neon on-Ear. Its inline microphone and remote put basic controls on the wire.
• Best for a compact wired pair to pack away → JLab Neon on-Ear. Its folding design and rotating cups make it easier to stow than a pair without those features.
• Best for voice-assistant access from the headphones → JBL Tune 510BT. Its multifunction button can activate Siri or Google Assistant on the connected device.
• Best headset for PC if you want a direct wired setup → JLab Neon on-Ear. Choose it if your computer has a compatible 3.5 mm connection and you prefer not to manage Bluetooth.
• Best headset for PC if you want freedom from a cable → JBL Tune 510BT. Choose it if your PC supports Bluetooth and you want to move around while listening.
Comfort is harder to settle from the listed features alone. Both are on-ear headphones with adjustable headbands, and the product information describes padded or plush cushions. Fit varies from person to person, so I would not assume that one will feel better for every head or every listening session. JBL's information includes guidance for adjusting its fit, while JLab emphasizes its lightweight construction and cushioned ear cups. Those are useful design considerations, not a guarantee of comfort.
Sound claims also need a little restraint. JBL identifies its tuning as Pure Bass, while JLab describes its 40 mm drivers as delivering a broad range of sound. Those descriptions can help you understand each product's intended presentation, but they do not tell the whole story of how music, calls, or video will sound to you. If sound is your deciding factor, consider what kind of listening you do and whether you would rather have wireless convenience or a wired connection alongside those sound descriptions.
If you are searching for Bluetooth headphones for PC, the JBL is the clear match because the JLab Neon is wired. If you are searching for over ear headphones for PC, check the fit description carefully: both are identified as on-ear headphones, so neither should be treated as a conventional over-ear choice simply because the JLab information mentions over-ear cups.
My Verdict
I would choose the JBL Tune 510BT for a PC setup because wireless listening, two-device switching, and up to 40 hours of battery life fit more situations than a fixed cable does. That is my pick if I want to move between the computer and phone without unplugging. If I were building a stationary setup and wanted a simple wired connection with inline controls, I would choose the JLab Neon instead. For PC use overall, I recommend the JBL, provided the computer can connect over Bluetooth.
For a Bluetooth connection, the JBL Tune 510BT is the match. For a wired connection through a compatible 3.5 mm jack, the JLab Neon is the direct choice. The right one depends on which connection you want at your computer.
The JLab Neon connects through a 3.5 mm cable and is not listed as a Bluetooth headphone. Its wired design does not require headphone battery charging for listening. You will need a compatible jack on the device.
The JBL Tune 510BT lists no noise control, so it should not be chosen for active noise cancellation. The JLab information lists active noise cancellation in its product details, but its key features focus on the wired design, inline controls, and comfort. Check the specific connection and noise-control details against your needs before choosing.
The JBL Tune 510BT can switch between two Bluetooth devices and includes a microphone for hands-free calls. The JLab Neon has an inline microphone and remote on its cable. Choose JBL for wireless device switching or JLab if you prefer call controls on a wired connection.
• GUCraftsman USB C Type vs YINKECASE Headphone Case Hard
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.