Due in part to public comment asserting an increase of trash in creeks over time, prevalence of scooters thrown in waterbodies, and concerns with homeless encampments, the City Council passed Resolution No. 20200123- 108 (CIUR 2234) directing the City Manager “to prepare a study with recommendations to improve the ecological health and safety of Austin’s rivers, lakes, and creeks by addressing litter problems, prevention, and abatement in our watershed.” The resolution further specified a list of deliverables to address litter problems and illegal dumping of electric micro-mobility devices (i.e., “scooters”) in waterways. Responsive to one of these deliverables, the Watershed Protection Department (WPD) Environmental RR-22-01 Page 2 of 53 Aug 2022 Monitoring and Compliance (EMC) Division completed a review of available data and comparable studies and subsequently implemented a field study quantifying the extent of trash in creeks as well as correlating predetermined sources to trash accumulation in representative locations around Austin.
Map of the Survey Area
More than a hundred miles of creeks were selected to represent the general spatial extent within the city limits (Left Photo) as well as to ensure representation of creeks within all ten city council districts (Right Photo). Sample areas included a mix of residential, multifamily, commercial, park, urban, suburban and undeveloped space within twenty watersheds. Sixteen creeks were sampled in their entirety from the headwater to their confluence with the receiving waterway, however, four creeks were only partially sampled because of their large size, access problems, and extent beyond the City of Austin jurisdiction. As part of the staff assigned to the project, I took part in field work as a team or solo with limited supervision traversing through miles of often running creeks.
A rubric, or matrix (Top Left), to visually characterize trash intensity for a one-time snapshot of trash in creeks was developed for the purpose of estimating aesthetic intensity, cumulative volume and time necessary to collect. Variability in rubric interpretation, or error, was limited by utilizing a small number of trained and calibrated staff scientist throughout the survey period. As the assistant project manager and one of the main scientist assigned to the project, I led one of these teams into the field, documenting any findings and reporting all field data.
While the study initially was conducted in response to rising motorized scooters and homelessness within the Austin, more sources were found to contribute to the trash being observed. While homelessness turned out to be a major contributor to the issue, many other occurrences played a role in the current litter problems as seen in the pie chart above on the right.
Assuming the non-surveyed creeks (117 miles of mainstem creeks) within the City of Austin full purpose jurisdiction (city limits) are generally similar to the surveyed creeks, then the total volume and clean-up time can be estimated for the city limits the and extra territorial jurisdiction, shown in on the excel chart I created above on the bottom right.
In the end, 19,467 total data points were collected every 30 feet for 110 miles of 20 creeks around the city.
In the End we had 5 Takeaways from this project to present to Austin City Council and the Environmental Commission.
Encampment was the most commonly-observed source, but is similar in intensity and range to most other sources
Trash intensity is not proportional to its drainage area (source input locations are deceiving)
There were no statistically significant correlations between trash intensity and:
Land use
Census
Transportation
Parks, etc.
Virtually anything can be found in creeks, but single use plastics were the most common item
76% of the trash is found in 10% of the area