Special Tanners Tours: Try spotting PRINCE WILLIAM Sat 6 June | THE KING Sat 13 June (Colonel's Review /Trooping the Colour King's Birthday Parade)
The UK is the grandfather or modern democracy and free speech following its Bill of Rights dating back to 1689
Organisations working to protect democratic & free-speech principles:
...has a vision of a world where everyone can enjoy the human rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights mechanisms. Its mission is to undertake research and action focused on preventing and ending grave abuses of these rights. Freedom of Expression (Free Speech) is protected by Article 19 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In the UK, Article 10 of the 1998 Human Rights Act protects our right to freedom of expression:
“Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.”
In the UK, freedom of speech is legally part of freedom of expression.
... campaigns for Internationally recognised human rights that include freedom of expression.
To the surprise of some, it recognises there has to be limits to 'free speech' as does defend UK. By seeking to protect a huge majority of the population (99%+) defend is inevitably limiting a much smaller minority seen to be hijacking and abusing it for self-interest.
Although Amnesty International's core work is targeted differently to that of the defend campaign, its analysis of both Free & Hate Speech as part of its work gives many additional useful insights for those researching 'the free speech dream'.
...has been promoting and defending freedom of information in the UK for 40 years.
"We played a leading role in persuading the government to introduce the Freedom of Information Act in 2000 and have successfully defended it from restrictions proposed by every government since.We seek to improve and defend freedom of information in support of a more vibrant and open democracy".
(credit Logos-World)
"We recognise free speech from multiple viewpoints and believe in questioning authority and supporting others to do so".
Channel 4 was mandated by the UK's elected parliament to champion unheard voices, take risks, challenge the status quo, and represent diverse perspectives across the UK. In other words, to shake broadcasting-up back in 1982, before the digital explosion took hold. It's uniquely a publicly owned, commercially funded UK Public Service Broadcaster (PSB) that operates at no cost to the taxpayer. All profits are reinvested into programmes. In 2012, Channel 4 turned 30 and David Abraham gave a speech offering fascinating insights in to the UK's role in fostering the right to speak out, even pointing to the coffee houses of the 1600s and Speakers Corner in London. His is not the only voice of course to represent established broadcasters and the critical role played alongside ITV, BBC Sky and others in 'speaking out' , but in a regulated way, originally to protect trge people from the powerful nature of broadcasting, identified from the start of radio more than a century ago.
English PEN is one of the world's oldest human rights organisations, championing the freedom to write and the freedom to read around the world. We are the founding centre of PEN International, a worldwide writers’ association with 130 centres in more than 90 countries.
With the support of our members – a community of writers, readers and activists – we protect freedom of expression whenever it is under attack. We campaign for writers facing persecution around the world and offer respite residencies for 3-5 writers per year.
Kaspersky's well witten analysis of Fake News is worth a read - without it being an endorsement of the company
Fake news refers to false or misleading information which masquerades as legitimate news. Generally, fake news falls into two categories:
Deliberately inaccurate stories – that is, the people publishing them know them to be false but publish them anyway. This might be to manipulate public opinion or to drive traffic to a specific website.
Stories that contain elements of truth but are broadly inaccurate. This might be because the writer hasn’t checked all their facts or has exaggerated certain aspects to make a particular point.
Misinformation isn’t a new phenomenon – the term “fake news” was actually used in the 19th century – but the internet and social media have transformed how it’s created and spread. Pre-internet, people tended to receive their news from trusted media sources whose journalists were required to follow strict codes of practice. The internet enabled new ways to publish, share and consume news and information, with relatively little regulation or editorial standards. Many people now consume news from social media and other online sources – but it’s not always easy to determine which stories are credible and which are false.
There are different types of fake news, depending on the motivation of those who create it. For example:
Sensationalism sells, and outrageous or weird stories and distorted images drive clicks and shares online. Clickbait refers to stories deliberately designed to get more website visitors and increase advertising revenue for the website owners – often at the expense of truth and accuracy.
This refers to false or distorted stories written to mislead audiences and promote a political agenda or biased perspective.
Sometimes, journalists don’t have time to check all their facts before publishing, leading to genuine mistakes becoming fake news. However, trusted new sources will correct errors in their stories and be transparent with readers when they’ve got things wrong.
Sometimes a story may be broadly true, but a sensationalist or misleading headline is used to entice readers to click on it. This can lead to fake news – since usually only the headline and small snippets of the article are displayed on social media, where it can quickly spread.
This is when genuine news sources are impersonated with false, made-up stories to deceive or mislead audiences.
Some fake news is published for entertainment value. For example, satirical stories use humor, irony, or exaggeration to joke about the news or famous people. These stories don't attempt to mislead audiences because they aren't meant to be taken seriously. Notable examples of satirical websites include The Onion and The Daily Mash.
High-profile politicians have been known to dismiss stories they disagree with – which may be factual and verified – as “fake news”. Because the term “fake news” is expansive and means different things to different people, it can be contested. In 2018, the British Government banned the term from official papers or documents, claiming it was too poorly defined to be meaningful. Instead, it prefers to use the terms "misinformation" and "disinformation" when describing false stories:
Disinformation– fake or misleading stories created and shared deliberately, often by a writer who might have a financial or political motive to do so.
Misinformation – this also means fake or misleading stories, but in this case, the stories may not have been deliberately created or shared with the intention to mislead.
Fake news is often spread through fake news websites, which, in an attempt to gain credibility, often emulate authentic news sources. According to research, social media enables false claims to spread quickly – more quickly, in fact, than real news. Fake news spreads rapidly because it’s typically designed to grab attention and appeal to emotions – which is why it often features outlandish claims or stories which provoke anger or fear.
Social media feeds often prioritize content based on engagement metrics – that is, how often it’s shared and liked – rather than how accurate or well-researched it is. This approach can allow clickbait, hyperbole, and misinformation to spread widely. Social media companies are seen as platforms rather than publishers, which means they don’t have the same legal liabilities as traditional media outlets – although this may change as the political and legal landscape evolves.
Social media bots can spread fake news since they mass produce and spread articles, regardless of the credibility of their sources. Bots can create fake accounts online, which then gain followers, recognition, and authority – some of which are programmed to spread misinformation.
Trolls – internet users who deliberately try to start arguments or upset people – also play a part in spreading fake news. Sometimes they can be paid to do so for political reasons. The terms “troll farm” or “troll factory” are sometimes used in this context to refer to institutionalized groups of trolls who attempt to interfere in political decision-making.
Fake news sometimes involves the use of Deepfakes. These are fake videos created using digital software, machine learning, and face-swapping. Images are combined to create new footage which shows events or actions that never actually took place. The results can be very convincing and difficult to identify as false.
Coronavirus fake news
The Covid-19 pandemic provided fertile ground for false information online, with numerous examples of fake news throughout the crisis. A persistent example of fake news in social media was the claim that 5G technology was linked to the spread of the virus – supposedly because 5G suppressed the immune system while the virus communicated through radio waves. These claims were not true and were repeatedly debunked by official sources but were still shared extensively.
US presidential election in 2016
Fake news and misinformation became a big issue during the US election in 2016, with false and misleading claims across the political spectrum. One analysis suggested that a large proportion of fake news generated in the election was created by teenagers in Macedonia, who found the more hyper-partisan stories they created, the more people clicked through and shared, and the more money they made as a result.
Boston Marathon bombing
In the wake of the Boston Marathon bombing in 2013, false claims that the bombing was an elaborate ruse plotted by the US government circulated online. In the wake of many terrorist events across the world, conspiracy theories are often rife. The notion that they are "false flag" operations – i.e., carried out by the state or a secret cabal to pin the blame on others or provide cover for other activities – is a common trope.
Kim Jong-un – the sexiest man alive?
In 2012, satirical website The Onion ran an article claiming that North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un had been voted the sexiest man alive, declaring that "the Pyongyang-bred heartthrob is every woman's dream come true." In an example of how satire can sometimes be misunderstood across cultures, publications in China – including the online version of China's Communist Party newspaper – reported the claim as though it were true.
Think before sharing – fake news thrives on misinformation. Stay safe with Kaspersky Premium, blocking threats and malware.
People often make important decisions – for example, how to vote in an election or what medical treatment to follow when they’re ill – based on what they read in the news. That’s why trusted news is so important. The dangers of fake news include:
When people can’t distinguish between real and fake news, it creates confusion and misunderstanding about important social and political issues. When people have a generalized sense of "you can't believe anything you read," it undermines overall trust in legitimate news sources.
Fake and misleading stories relating to medical treatments or major diseases – such as cancer or Covid-19 – could lead to individuals making misinformed decisions about their health.
A lot of fake news is designed to stir up and intensify social conflict. When different sides of an argument have their own ‘facts’, it leads to greater polarization within societies and can affect electoral outcomes.
Universities and colleges expect students to use quality sources of information for assignments. Students who use sources with false or misleading information could receive lower grades.
You may be wondering how to identify fake news on Facebook and other social media sites? As a student, how to avoid fake news? Or how to avoid accidentally sharing misinformation online? Here are ten tips to identify misinformation, recognize fake news websites, and think before you share:
1. Check the source:
Check the web address for the page you're looking at. Sometimes, fake news sites may have spelling errors in the URL or use less conventional domain extensions such as ".infonet" or ".offer". If you are unfamiliar with the site, look in the About Us section.
2. Check the author:
Research them to see if they are credible – for example, are they real, do they have a good reputation, are they writing about their specific area of expertise, and do they have a particular agenda? Consider what the writer’s motivation might be.
3. Check other sources:
Are other reputable news or media outlets reporting on the story? Are credible sources cited within the story? Professional global news agencies have editorial guidelines and extensive resources for fact-checking, so if they are also reporting the story, that’s a good sign.
4. Maintain a critical mindset:
A lot of fake news is cleverly written to provoke strong emotional reactions such as fear or anger. Maintain a critical mindset by asking yourself – why has this story been written? Is it promoting a particular cause or agenda? Is it trying to make me click through to another website?
5. Check the facts:
Credible news stories will include plenty of facts – data, statistics, quotes from experts, and so on. If these are missing, question why. Reports with false information often contain incorrect dates or altered timelines, so it’s a good idea to check when the article was published. Is it a current or old news story?
6. Check the comments:
Even if the article or video is legitimate, the comments below may not be. Often links or comments posted in response to content can be autogenerated by bots or people hired to put our misleading or confusing information.
7. Check your own biases:
We all have biases – could these be influencing the way you respond to the article? Social media can create echo chambers by suggesting stories that match your existing browsing habits, interests, and opinions. The more we read from diverse sources and perspectives, the more likely it is that we can draw accurate conclusions.
8. Check whether it’s a joke:
Satirical websites are popular, and sometimes it is not always clear whether a story is just a joke or parody. Check the website to see if it’s known for satire or creating funny stories.
9. Check images are authentic:
Images you see on social media could have been edited or manipulated. Possible signs include warping – where straight lines in the background now appear wavy – as well as strange shadows, jagged edges, or skin tone that looks too perfect. Bear in mind, too, that an image may be accurate but simply used in a misleading context. You can use tools such as Google’s Reverse Image Search to check where an image originates from and whether it has been altered.
10. Use a fact-checking site:
Some of the best known include:
Fake news relies on believers reposting, retweeting, or otherwise sharing false information. If you're not sure whether an article is authentic or not, pause and think before you share.
The Future of Free Speech is an independent, non-partisan think tank located at Vanderbilt University.We will reaffirm freedom of expression as the bedrock of free and thriving societies through actionable research, empowering tools, and principled advocacy.
...scrutinises the structures for Government decision-making on national security, particularly the role of the National Security Council and the National Security Adviser. In February 2025 it launched a 'Defending Democracy Inquiry. Many individuals and organisations gave evidence which can be browsed 'as live' or written on the JCNSS inquiry pages
Individuals
Schools
Politicians
Journalists
Charities
Employers
Employees
Consumers
Volunteers
But first
The defend campaign launched with a manifesto to protect & promote fairer free speech for democracy in spring 2026, but its work was quietly underway before that; the need is urgent.
The campaign's first volunteer, its founder Jason Tanner, needs the help & resource of other citizen volunteers and philanthropists to join him and to strengthen its mission through donation of time, enthusiasm, skills, money or gifts-in-kind.
If you can volunteer time then please Get Involved with the defend Campaign
If you feel you can Support the defend Campaign then it greatly welcomes gifts in-kind or money.
The defend Campaign is promoting free resources & information for others and also actively seeks partners and case studies from individuals and from both private and public sector organisations, enterprises and charities. Case study contributions can be kept anonymous if preferred.
What would help the campaign to flourish further?
The campaign needs its own phone number and internet domain eventually as it currently freely 'borrows' from elsewhere.
It would be great if you can offer occasional space suitable to host events in Westminster or other parts of London and eventually the UK. We also need space for volunteers to meet and ideally some sustainable office space to help progress 'from the kitchen table' in Haringey.
In the ideal world, no volunteer should be out of pocket for their contribution of time, so support towards travel costs or materials such as printing questionnaires or other materials will always be welcomed. Failing that, a tin of biscuits or a box of tea bags will no doubt be well received by volunteers as they work. If you can donate money or resources then please do email Jason at the defend campaign direct: hello@defenduk.uk or at jason@jasontanner.uk or 07941 433598.