Research:
Cell State Transitions:
A "Cell State" can be associated with a variety of characteristics such as shape, size, morphology, the presence of specific RNA and/or protein molecules, and active or inactive promoter sites. Cells transition from one functional or phenotypic state to another during key biological processes such as embryonic development, tissue regeneration, and the adaptability of cancer cells. Decades ago, Waddington proposed that cells transition from one (metastable) state to another, akin to a marble rolling down a hill with many valleys. While Waddington's landscape provides a qualitative view of cell state transitions, understanding these transitions at the molecular level is crucial for advancing basic biological knowledge and developing targeted cancer therapies that effectively manage and potentially reverse undesirable cellular behaviors.
The understanding of how cells switch states in response to various signals and environmental conditions is pivotal to cellular resilience and plasticity. This knowledge is particularly vital in cancer research, where malignant cells often hijack these transition pathways to promote growth and resist treatments. Gaining a deeper understanding of these processes offers the potential to develop more effective therapeutic strategies that can specifically target and disrupt pathological transitions, opening new avenues for treatment in oncology.
MCF10A, a non-tumorigenic cell line, could be a potential candidate to study cell state transitions under different ligand treatments. Comparing "control" versus "treatment" cellular behavior could be crucial in understanding these transitions. It is currently impossible to obtain all information characterizing a cell state using available technology; we cannot measure the state of all the molecules within a cell at once. However, the expression of "key" markers that potentially constitute a "functional cell state" can be measured using single-cell multi-omics technologies. Therefore, it is tempting to measure a few cellular properties (measure the measurable) and develop a model to connect them. We characterize morphodynamic cell states and transitions between them by building the Markov State Model (MSM) from single-cell trajectories based on cellular features. Using linear algebra, we connect the morphodynamic cell states to RNA levels of genes, which are measured from the bulk RNA-seq experiments. We predicted RNA levels of each gene in morphodynamic cell states of the "test set" using machine learning, thus connecting cellular motion to molecules.
Publications from Zuckerman Lab in collaboration with Prof. Laura Heiser:
Jeremy Copperman, Sean M. Gross, Young Hwan Chang, Laura M. Heiser, and Daniel M. Zuckerman, Communications Biology (2023) 6:484.
Jeremy Copperman, Ian C. Mclean, Sean M. Gross, Young Hwan Chang, Daniel M. Zuckerman, and Laura M. Heiser, "Single-cell morphodynamical trajectories enable prediction of gene expression accompanying cell state change", bioRxiv: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.18.576248
Droplets within living cells:
Membraneless organelles within cells are often termed cellular "condensates" or "droplets", e.g., stress granules, germ granules, nucleolus, nuclear speckles, etc., which form via a process known as liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), associated with weak multivalent interactions comprising proteins, RNAs, and DNA. These condensates form and dissolve within cytoplasm and nucleoplasm, dynamically, to perform various cellular functions, e.g., gene transcription, DNA replication and repair, protein synthesis, etc. Several diseases are believed to have originated due to irreversibility and misregulation of the droplets including cancer, Huntingtin disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; regulation of the droplets is performed by post-translation modifications, e.g., phosphorylation of protein residues, and RNA-mediated feedback control during gene transcription, etc. I am interested in the following questions:
Why are condensates necessary to perform several biological functions? What is the composition of proteins, RNAs, and DNA which gives rise to specific cellular functions? How do chemical reactions inside and outside the droplets affect their size, location, and growth? What is the role of chromatin in cellular condensates' formation, regulations, and diseases? I perform coarse-grained and all-atom MD simulations to unravel those questions.
References:
Y. Shin and C. P. Brangwynne, Science 357, eaaf4382 (2017).
G. L. Dignon, R. B. Best, and J. Mittal, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem 71 53–75 (2020).
S. F. Banani et al., Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 285 (2017).
A. Boija, I. A. Klein, and R. A. Young, Cancer Cell 39, 174–192 (2021).
J. E. Henninger et al., Cell 184, 207–225 (2021).
T. Quail et al., Nature Physics 17, 1007–1012, (2021).
Y. Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 258102 (2021).
P. Bhat, D. Honson, and M. Guttman, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 1–18 (2021).
Schematic phase diagram of droplets within cells
Binary colloids subjected to an external asymmetric potential:
In this work, we simulated a binary mixture of colloidal particles subjected to an asymmetric external potential along the Z-direction, published in J. Phys: Condens. Matter 33, 125101 (2021), arXiv link. This may be used to understand transport across biological cell membranes.
Quorum sensing bacteria:
We have devised a model system for active dense systems, where activity of the smaller particles is manipulated by (local-density-dependent) quorum sensing scheme. PRE 101, 022606 (2020) arXiv link
Glass transition under phase separation:
In my graduation, I have worked on the coarse-grained simulations of polymer melts (linear and branched) in the glassy state and analyze results using Statistical Mechanics. We have investigated violation of Stokes-Einstein and Stokes-Einstein-Debye relations in supercooled linear polymers, at the (dilute) gas and supercooled domains coexistence. Our results show that violation of these relations is due to a disparity in the motion of fast and slow particles (monomers). This could be relevant to the aggregation within cellular environments due to misregulation of droplets as described above. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 33, 055401 (2021) arXiv link
We have coined a new relation between the structural relaxation time and local density (nearest neighbor peak of radial distribution function) in the supercooled linear polymer melt and Kob-Anderson binary mixture, which can be an alternative to the existing relation between the Debye-Waller factor and the relaxation time. AIP Conference Proceedings 2265, 030220 (2020); D. C. Thakur, Jalim Singh, Anna Varughese, Prasanth P. Jose, "Relation between local density and density relaxation near glass transition in a glass forming binary mixture", under review, arxiv Link .
