This study examines preferences for prevention programmes promoting healthy ageing among French adults aged 40–59 using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). A nationally representative sample of 1,526 respondents, all of whom reported lifestyle habits below WHO recommendations, completed ten choice tasks comparing hypothetical prevention programmes varying in duration, delivery mode, follow-up, required effort in physical activity and diet, and monthly cost. Random-effects logit, alternative-specific multinomial logit, and mixed logit models were estimated to assess determinants of programme uptake and preference heterogeneity. Five of the six programme attributes significantly influenced choice across all model specifications. Longer programme duration reduced uptake, while individual delivery modes were clearly preferred over group-based options. Remote follow-up methods (digital or teleconsultation) were generally favoured. Higher levels of required effort—whether in physical activity or dietary modification—decreased participation likelihood, with substantial heterogeneity observed across individuals. Monthly cost exerted the largest and most consistent negative effect on programme choice. Sociodemographic characteristics such as income and occupational status significantly predicted participation, whereas health status and prevention messages had limited influence. Use of digital health devices and positive motivation towards national recommendations substantially increased opt-in behaviour. Mixed logit results showed substantial unobserved preference heterogeneity, particularly regarding programme modality, physical activity requirements, dietary changes, and cost. Overall, respondents expressed strong interest in structured prevention programmes, but only when these are affordable, personalized, and impose manageable effort. The findings provide robust quantitative evidence to guide the design of acceptable and effective prevention interventions aligned with population preferences.
This paper evaluates the impact of the National Breast Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP), implemented in France in 2004 and targeting women aged 50-74, on breast cancer mortality. While previous research has explored the socioeconomic and behavioural determinants influencing participation in the screening program, gaps remain in understanding how population-based screening affects breast cancer mortality.
This study uses CépiDc mortality data (2005-2021) for women aged 25-74 across 13 French regions, alongside regional screening participation rates from Santé Publique and socioeconomic covariates from INSEE, and identifies disparities in mortality and participation trends. A parametric Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD) is employed to assess the screening effect around the age eligibility threshold, addressing imperfect compliance by instrumenting actual participation on eligibility.
Findings indicate that sub-optimal participation reduces the program’s full potential impact on mortality to approximately half of its intent-to-treat. The study also finds that increased availability of treatment facilities and Regional cancer screening coordination centres correlates with lower mortality rates. Robustness checks using non-parametric approaches confirm these findings.
This paper provides important policy implications to encourage screening uptake and improve health outcomes.
This is a personal website. Any view or opinion represented in this website is personal and belongs solely to the website owner and does not represent those of people and institutions that the owner might be associated with.