I am experimenting with a different type of final exam. This year, you will choose one essay question from a list. The questions are below. Handing in your exam will be just like an any-day take home. You can upload your essay answer at any point, just as long as you submit it anonymously and electronically before 9am on the last day of exams. The essay should be no more than 10 pages doubled spaced, 1-inch margins, 12-point serif font. You must do outside research and you must specifically answer the questions provided. Points will have to be deducted if you answer a different question. You must have a thesis, an argument to prove that thesis, and it must be appropriately supported by referencing cases, scholarly literatures, policies, and so forth. You must also use proper BlueBook citations. Good practice!
Fordham Law allows faculty to "bump" student grades based on class performance. Any bumps will be based on class participation and our several in-class activities.
The privacy torts have been called "insufficient [to protect privacy] in a digital age". With references to specific cases and any other necessary material, make an argument as to why this statement is particularly true for marginalized populations, including women, Black, Latinos/Latinas, members of the LGBTQ community, Indigenous, and other persons of color. In so doing, identify no fewer than three reasons to support your argument, and support each of those reasons with sufficient justification.
In what ways is privacy a right of the privileged? Put another way, how is privacy often denied to women, particularly Black women, as well as members of the LGBTQ community, particularly those who are transgender, and other traditionally marginalized groups, including, but not limited to, Indigenous persons and other minority groups)? Give specific examples to support your argument. Why is this the case? What are some of the legal (i.e., doctrinal), social, and policy or political reasons why privacy is often a privilege of those with or adjacent to power?
From a privacy perspective, should government decisions--from which potholes get fixed to who gets released on parole--be made by machines based on artificial intelligence and trained on vast data sets? In what ways is the institutionalization of automated decision-making contributing to entrenching racism and other forms of discrimination against marginalized populations? What are the doctrinal and policy implications of your answer. Answer with reference to cases, literatures, and give specific examples.