Embedded Files
The ability to evaluate information is an important skill to develop and hone. Right now as a student, it is a skill you need to determine if the information you find during your research is credible and useful for your assignment. However, information evaluation is a life skill that you will use beyond your time at Ventura College.
When you encounter information in your everyday life, whether it be a television news report, an ad for a politician you received in the mail, or a social media post, you will need to be critical and assess whether or not the information is truthful, credible, and trustworthy.
There are many handy acronyms and frameworks out there to help guide you in evaluating the credibility of sources. The reason there are so many of these is because sometimes the terminology can be confusing and really there is no one correct path for evaluating information. However, each of the acronyms and frameworks for evaluation cover similar concepts. We'll link you to examples of some of these acronyms and frameworks below so you can add them to your tool belt.
For this workshop, we will use the RADAR Framework for evaluating information because it was originally developed to focus on evaluation of online sources. You can either open the menu by clicking on the arrow on the right side of this dialogue box or download and save a RADAR Framework handout
Rationale
Rationale is important because all information is created to serve a purpose. Remember that no information is completely free from bias because the author's own positions, beliefs, and life experiences will always impact their perceptions.
The rationale may include the intent to educate, entertain, sell a product, or promote a certain point of view. Some sources may even (intentionally or not) provide inaccurate or false information.
Different points of view can be valid as long as they are based on good reasoning and careful use of evidence.
Why did the author or publisher make this information available?
Is there an obvious and/or extreme bias or prejudice?
Are there alternative points of view presented?
Does the author omit any important facts or data that might disprove their claim?
If there is emotion, what is it and what is the purpose?
What tone is being used?
Authority
Authority is important in judging the credibility of the author's assertions. The author should have knowledge and experience with the topic. Look for an "About the Author" section of a book or website or do a Google search for the author's name to learn more.
Additionally, any person or organization that publishes or sponsors the information should be reputable. On websites, look for an "About" page or any page that would give information and history on the sponsoring person or group to learn more.
What is the author's background? Do they have education or experience with the topic presented?
Is the author affiliated with an educational institution or reputable organization?
Does the author write on other topics? If so, are they related or in different fields?
Is the publisher of the information source reputable?
Date
Date is important to note because, as you know from the information lifecycle, information changes over time and can become obsolete or inaccurate. Supporting your research with facts that have been superseded by new research or recent events weakens your argument. Not all assignments require the most current information; older materials can provide valuable information such as a historical overview of your topic. In some disciplines, the date of the source is less important, while in others it is very important.
When was the information published or last updated?
Have newer articles been published on the topic?
Are links or references to other sources up-to-date?
Is the topic in an area that changes rapidly like technology or science?
Is the information obsolete or out-of-date?
Accuracy
Accuracy is important because errors, misinformation, and disinformation distort lines of reasoning. When you present inaccurate information, you undermine your own credibility.
Information presented as fact should be supported by cited sources. For example, if there is a claim that says "studies show" a particular fact, that study should be cited so you can review and verify that it exists and is credible.
Are there statements you know to be false? Verify an unlikely story by finding a reputable outlet reporting on the same thing.
Was the information reviewed by editors or subject-experts (peer-reviewed) before it was published? Was it fact-checked? How do you know?
Are there citations and references to support data and claims presented? If so, follow those references to verify. If there are no references or bad references, this could be a red flag.
What do other people have to say on the topic? Is there general agreement among subject-experts?
If applicable, is there a description of the research method used? Does the method seem appropriate and well-executed?
Was the information published by a peer-reviewed journal, academic press, or other reliable publisher?
If there are pictures, have they been doctored? Use a reverse image search like TinEye to see where an image really comes from.
For trusted websites, what is the domain? Fake sites often add ".co" to trusted brands (e.g. abcnews.com.co)
Relevance
Relevance is important because you are expected to support your ideas with related, pertinent information. For example, a source detailing Einstein's marriage would not be very relevant to a paper about his scientific theories.
Does the information answer your research question?
Does the information meet the requirements for your assignment?
Is the information too technical or too simplified for your use?
Who is the intended audience?
Does the source add something new to your knowledge of the topic?
Is the information focused on the geographical location you are interested in?
Other Helpful Acronyms
Sources
Loyola Marymount University William H. Hannon Library (2021). Evaluating Sources: Using the RADAR Framework. https://libguides.lmu.edu/aboutRADAR
Mandalios, J. (2013). RADAR: An approach for helping students evaluate Internet sources. Journal Of Information Science, 39, 470-478. doi:10.1177/0165551513478889
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse